400k vpp to SNE in 73 days - Page 8

according to his blog he is -20k now

http://pokerpoopy.blogspot.com/

-90 buy ins but he sais that even if he loses 400 buy ins he'll be breakeven and supernova elite

at the rate he is losing maybe it is profitable to sit at his tables

pretty ridiculous how he think he's just on a downswing ; like 90 buy-ins downswings are standard at theses limits rofl reminds me of FGators

reading his blog, he sounds pretty delusional about this whole affair

he's claiming he's learned more about poker than he ever thought possible during this prop bet: how the fuck do you learn when you're mass tabling a stake lower than you normally play? i've heard numerous reports from people playing against him that he's a lot easier to play against than usual, and this is no surprise. sure, you can learn how to take beats and learn how to persevere but you won't learn anything specific to the game itself: doing this requires LESS tables and indepth hand analysis

he also claims you should have a 100bi bankroll as a MINIMUM for a stake you wish to play...what the fuck? sure it might help you psychologically, but realistically the odds of going on a +50bi downswing are so unlikely for a true winner that this golden nugget of advice is laughable

yes he is a delutional idiot if he thinks a 100bi downswing is normal, i dont know if he has an edge but i dont think its over 0.5bb/100

He seems pretty arrogant. I like when arrogant people fail.

-94 BI.....wow

just remember of the 94 bi down how much of that is probably in rake

will be interesting if he gets SNE w/ time to spare and has to try to play less tables and actually focus on profiting to be able to win the bet (since profit must be > 0)

lol @ all challenges really...

wow

Wonder how Sobraoboy does it. Myself I cant do shit right if I play more than 8 tables fullring. 24 tables 6max is just sick...

On November 09 2008 23:00 MezmerizePLZ wrote: will be interesting if he gets SNE w/ time to spare and has to try to play less tables and actually focus on profiting to be able to win the bet (since profit must be > 0)

wanna bet? i give u 10 to 1

wait, so why didn't he just skip all this BS and play at his normal stakes and get SNE? He'd of made a crapton more money..??? Or was it not possible for him to get it at his normal stake so he has to do this balls out crazy shit

On November 12 2008 22:01 Night2o1 wrote: wait, so why didn't he just skip all this BS and play at his normal stakes and get SNE? He'd of made a crapton more money..??? Or was it not possible for him to get it at his normal stake so he has to do this balls out crazy shit

1/2 is his normal stakes.

Ah, I thought I heard someone mention he usually played higher

either way ur advice is bad cuz if he played higher he would of lost more money since its apparent he can't even breakeven at 1/2 and is down 100buyins

I thought it made sense assuming he was a winner at the higher stake but obviously can't handle so many tables even if its at a lower stake. IF he did play higher stakes maybe he could of just added 2 tables or something and played a ridiculous # of hours.

But you probably knew what I meant.

he plays a bit weak right now if you ask me.

You won't believe how many of these regulars are actually breakeven players but put in so many hands that they profit huge from rakeback/bonusses.

There's this guy on 3/6 on iPoker and he breaks even but makes 30k in rakeback + rakeraces a month :|