400k vpp to SNE in 73 days - Page 5

How much action he got?

tough start...

anyways, so apparently the internet for time warner cable is down for all of brooklyn queens and manhattan. yay....and apparently, the modem is broken, yay x2.... here i am on day 2 and only 8 hours of poker completed....i have ordered verizon and told them to come and give me their best **** immediately- it is coming tmw. or something like that... time warner is back up for the time being, so i hope until verizon comes that his works- i'm gonna keep both just as backup AMAZING START!!! uhhhhhhh so that's my morning, up at 6am and only 2 hours played by 1pm- i am about to play 48 hours straight i think cuz i'm pissed, talk to you all later pz KP

later:

down 12 BI's total, vpp's only at 412,291 = helpppppp!!!!!!! i'm gonna go to bed for 3 or 4 hours and get up at 7, hopefully playing by 7:30 and gonna have a big day tmw- night all

a 1/2 regular posted:

I have played with a him a bit in the past two days and he isn't the same player. VERY easy to play against (think straightfoward); used to be a little tricky. It sure doesn't hurt that I have coolered him a few times. I just don't see him being a winning player with his new approach especially since most regs will know that he is 24 tabling for this bet and pound on him

so yeah it wont be easy...

On October 21 2008 18:22 capaneo wrote: How much action he got?

about 60K i think

lol at least he can afford to lose around 300 buyins then in his aim for all those vpp

in the thread he states he gets around 0,45 vpp per hand. so basically he needs to play around 900k hands in 73 days.

or wait.. is it 600k vpp he needs?

doh.. he needs to be at least breakeven too.

that makes it a lot tougher

yes he needs 600 000 vpps

whats his name on stars?

and is he playing nl200 fr?

pretty sure he's fucked

So how is he doing?

On October 22 2008 09:44 lachlan wrote: whats his name on stars? and is he playing nl200 fr?

pokerpoopy i think

this guy is so fucked

talk about saving everything for the last minute

i see him mostly at 200nl 6max tables, somtimes 100nl even

They should really make a professional escrow/propbetting site where you pay 1% for some institution
to intermediate... Its much easier trusting an institution than a person, and I think there will be much
demand among rich gamblers, and if Doyle and Ivey guys starts using the service... well, 1% of 10M is 100K..

Yeah nobody is going to pay that kind of a sick fee for a basic escrow service unless they are a moron. Especially because Pokerstars may eventually provide that for free considering all the rake they charge us .

On October 25 2008 22:01 r3v wrote: They should really make a professional escrow/propbetting site where you pay 1% for some institution to intermediate... Its much easier trusting an institution than a person, and I think there will be much demand among rich gamblers, and if Doyle and Ivey guys starts using the service... well, 1% of 10M is 100K..

There is no reason for people like Doyle and Ivey to use a service that will cost them 100k lol...

A more likely proposition is that you'd just charge flat fees for transactions

On October 18 2008 15:24 RaSZi wrote: Show nested quote + On October 18 2008 03:04 Daut wrote:   On October 17 2008 15:51 RaSZi wrote: he plays 25-50 regularly.. i doubt he will suffer a lot of significant downswings on 1-2 even though u 50 table it.. it's just too easy to beat. Dunno.. i mean.. i had 3 different weeks in which i made 100k+vpp. Hard to say.. i think i could do it.. so that kinda makes me not want to bet.. plus 6:1 is not profitable enough.. we're not all poorusers accepting 300:1 disadvantage.. not in cash games you didnt. its not possible in cash to do it in a week sorry to disappoint you .. 130k hands on 10-20 do a lot for ur vpp rate

so sick, how many tables for how long per day did you play?

I believe RaSZi did a 30+ hr session a little whiles back, not sure how many tables though.