Agastia: bets $32.30 and is all-in
edzwoo: calls $32.30
Showdown Agastia: shows (two pair, Nines and Sevens)
edzwoo: mucks hand
Agastia collected $122.10 from pot
Agastia is sitting out
Summary Total pot $124.10 | Rake $2
Board
Seat 1: kingthe edge (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Agastia showed and won ($122.10) with two pair, Nines and Sevens
Seat 5: edzwoo (button) mucked
Seat 6: evantair (small blind) folded before Flop
kingthe edge: checks
edzwoo: bets $20
kingthe edge: raises $20 to $40
edzwoo: raises $21 to $61
kingthe edge: calls $0.90 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($20.10) returned to edzwoo
River (Pot : $103.80)
Showdown kingthe edge: shows (a straight, Six to Ten)
edzwoo: mucks hand
kingthe edge collected $102.80 from pot
Summary Total pot $103.80 | Rake $1
Board
Seat 1: kingthe edge (small blind) showed and won ($102.80) with a straight, Six to Ten
Seat 5: edzwoo (big blind) mucked
Seat 6: evantair (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Might've been able to fold here I dunno.
Then I went 0/5 or so on 3bets.
Then I went 0/2 on 4bets.
Then I constantly got my cbets raised by passive donks and nits in every iso.
Then I timed out 3 river calls I should have made.
PokerStars Game #28959325044: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2009/06/03 17:57:43 CT [2009/06/03 18:57:43 ET]
Table Ganymede IV 9-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: ifoundnemo23 ($140.40 in chips)
Seat 2: lessharm ($100 in chips)
Seat 3: Ronfar3 ($100 in chips)
Seat 4: millers11 ($96.75 in chips)
Seat 5: edzwoo ($102.80 in chips)
Seat 6: covang80 ($61.45 in chips)
Seat 7: seven9 ($48 in chips)
Seat 8: justDgmt ($100 in chips)
Seat 9: Remwer ($36 in chips)
lessharm: posts small blind $0.50
Ronfar3: posts big blind $1
Holecards Dealt to edzwoo
millers11: folds
edzwoo has timed out
edzwoo: folds
edzwoo is sitting out
edzwoo has returned
covang80: raises $3 to $4
seven9: folds
justDgmt: folds
Remwer: folds
ifoundnemo23: folds
lessharm: folds
Ronfar3: folds
Uncalled bet ($3) returned to covang80
covang80 collected $2.50 from pot
Summary Total pot $2.50 | Rake $0
Seat 1: ifoundnemo23 (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: lessharm (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: Ronfar3 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: millers11 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: edzwoo folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: covang80 collected ($2.50)
Seat 7: seven9 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 8: justDgmt folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 9: Remwer folded before Flop (didnt bet)
PokerStars Game #28959725133: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2009/06/03 18:09:14 CT [2009/06/03 19:09:14 ET]
Table Erriapo II 9-max Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: platoniko ($103 in chips)
Seat 2: L3NGTHY ($107.20 in chips)
Seat 4: oll220 ($100 in chips)
Seat 5: edzwoo ($100 in chips)
Seat 6: Ronfar3 ($118.55 in chips)
Seat 7: gynisc ($127.40 in chips)
Seat 8: AlexB182s ($105.45 in chips)
Seat 9: 19Foxy76 ($94 in chips)
19Foxy76: posts small blind $0.50
platoniko: posts big blind $1
KUIvy: sits out
Holecards Dealt to edzwoo
L3NGTHY: folds
oll220: folds
edzwoo has timed out
edzwoo: folds
edzwoo is sitting out
Ronfar3: folds
gynisc: folds
AlexB182s: folds
19Foxy76: folds
Uncalled bet ($0.50) returned to platoniko
edzwoo has returned
platoniko collected $1 from pot
platoniko: doesnt show hand
Summary Total pot $1 | Rake $0
Seat 1: platoniko (big blind) collected ($1)
Seat 2: L3NGTHY folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: oll220 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: edzwoo folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: Ronfar3 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 7: gynisc folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 8: AlexB182s (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 9: 19Foxy76 (small blind) folded before Flop
PokerStars Game #28959330876: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2009/06/03 17:57:53 CT [2009/06/03 18:57:53 ET]
Table Kale X 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: eYeLovErAgS ($102.15 in chips)
Seat 2: JumboDog2 ($103.25 in chips)
Seat 3: S500 ($114.70 in chips)
Seat 4: KAMASUTRHA ($110.05 in chips)
Seat 5: CitMan05 ($34 in chips)
Seat 8: edzwoo ($116.65 in chips)
Seat 9: TomyZ ($54.25 in chips)
S500: posts small blind $0.50
KAMASUTRHA: posts big blind $1
knn05: sits out
Yea well, after this little session (guess were I started today?) to calm my nerves I guess Lady Luck owns me good questions on the exam. I feel that I might sometimes be sitting in unnecessary hard games when I play 5/10. There's only like maybe 6-7 really bad regs there for my standards so now when I'm supposed to "go pro" or whatever it's called I think I'll try to play exclusively 3/6 for maybe 100k hands or so. Would be fun to actually get make sure that I win every month again rather then having swings of 20k every 2nd month or so.
PokerStars Game #28943508792: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2009/06/03 12:03:00 ET
Table Aquarius 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: mabumsel ($166.90 in chips)
Seat 2: LordAD85 ($175.40 in chips)
mabumsel: posts small blind $0.50
LordAD85: posts big blind $1
Holecards(Odds) Dealt to LordAD85
mabumsel: raises $2 to $3
LordAD85: raises $7 to $10
mabumsel: raises $17 to $27
LordAD85: raises $30 to $57
mabumsel: raises $109.90 to $166.90 and is all-in
LordAD85: calls $109.90
Showdown LordAD85: shows (a full house, Nines full of Aces)
mabumsel: mucks hand
LordAD85 collected $333.30 from pot
Summary Total pot $333.80 | Rake $0.50
Board
Seat 1: mabumsel (button) (small blind) mucked
Seat 2: LordAD85 (big blind) showed and won ($333.30) with a full house, Nines full of Aces
unfortunately before this hand i had lost a bunch to him
failing my bluffs
+ 361 $ 3/3 days into June
wont play much the next few days since i have a shitload of university stuff and will enter a grappling tournament in Coburg
on saturday : ( well i suck at grappling without GnP ... but its still necessary for MMA so i have to roll from time to time)
Usually my Groundgame is all about getting Mount of back mount -> go KingKong on opponent face.
I am not that good at submissions
And i really have problems breaking someones guard in a grappling match. ( In MMA its easier since u can just do some Fedor in guard striking and almost all opponents will open guard to dodge the punches )
P.S. Another Question -How do you size your bluff 4bets and why?
Submitted by : LemOn[5thF]
PokerStars Game #28944963709: Holdem No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2009/06/03 12:50:52 ET
Table Pamina V 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: Minusevvvv ($25.25 in chips)
Seat 3: vvv-venlo-01 ($38.75 in chips)
Seat 4: DoC.LemOn ($25 in chips)
Yannick PONS will be allowed to play after the button
Minusevvvv: posts small blind $0.10
vvv-venlo-01: posts big blind $0.25
Holecards Dealt to DoC.LemOn
DoC.LemOn: raises $0.75 to $1
Minusevvvv: folds
vvv-venlo-01: calls $0.75
vvv-venlo-01: bets $1.25
WTA50100 joins the table at seat #2
takeonmenutz joins the table at seat #6
DoC.LemOn: raises $5.75 to $7
vvv-venlo-01: calls $5.75
Op-Ed column from the NYTimes by Paul Krugman. This one is for you ToTehEastSide:
“This bill is the most important legislation for financial institutions in the last 50 years. It provides a long-term solution for troubled thrift institutions. ... All in all, I think we hit the jackpot.” So declared Ronald Reagan in 1982, as he signed the Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act.
He was, as it happened, wrong about solving the problems of the thrifts. On the contrary, the bill turned the modest-sized troubles of savings-and-loan institutions into an utter catastrophe. But he was right about the legislation’s significance. And as for that jackpot — well, it finally came more than 25 years later, in the form of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.
For the more one looks into the origins of the current disaster, the clearer it becomes that the key wrong turn — the turn that made crisis inevitable — took place in the early 1980s, during the Reagan years.
Attacks on Reaganomics usually focus on rising inequality and fiscal irresponsibility. Indeed, Reagan ushered in an era in which a small minority grew vastly rich, while working families saw only meager gains. He also broke with longstanding rules of fiscal prudence.
On the latter point: traditionally, the U.S. government ran significant budget deficits only in times of war or economic emergency. Federal debt as a percentage of G.D.P. fell steadily from the end of World War II until 1980. But indebtedness began rising under Reagan; it fell again in the Clinton years, but resumed its rise under the Bush administration, leaving us ill prepared for the emergency now upon us.
The increase in public debt was, however, dwarfed by the rise in private debt, made possible by financial deregulation. The change in America’s financial rules was Reagan’s biggest legacy. And it’s the gift that keeps on taking.
The immediate effect of Garn-St. Germain, as I said, was to turn the thrifts from a problem into a catastrophe. The S.& L. crisis has been written out of the Reagan hagiography, but the fact is that deregulation in effect gave the industry — whose deposits were federally insured — a license to gamble with taxpayers’ money, at best, or simply to loot it, at worst. By the time the government closed the books on the affair, taxpayers had lost $130 billion, back when that was a lot of money.
But there was also a longer-term effect. Reagan-era legislative changes essentially ended New Deal restrictions on mortgage lending — restrictions that, in particular, limited the ability of families to buy homes without putting a significant amount of money down.
These restrictions were put in place in the 1930s by political leaders who had just experienced a terrible financial crisis, and were trying to prevent another. But by 1980 the memory of the Depression had faded. Government, declared Reagan, is the problem, not the solution; the magic of the marketplace must be set free. And so the precautionary rules were scrapped.
Together with looser lending standards for other kinds of consumer credit, this led to a radical change in American behavior.
We weren’t always a nation of big debts and low savings: in the 1970s Americans saved almost 10 percent of their income, slightly more than in the 1960s. It was only after the Reagan deregulation that thrift gradually disappeared from the American way of life, culminating in the near-zero savings rate that prevailed on the eve of the great crisis. Household debt was only 60 percent of income when Reagan took office, about the same as it was during the Kennedy administration. By 2007 it was up to 119 percent.
All this, we were assured, was a good thing: sure, Americans were piling up debt, and they weren’t putting aside any of their income, but their finances looked fine once you took into account the rising values of their houses and their stock portfolios. Oops.
Now, the proximate causes of today’s economic crisis lie in events that took place long after Reagan left office — in the global savings glut created by surpluses in China and elsewhere, and in the giant housing bubble that savings glut helped inflate.
But it was the explosion of debt over the previous quarter-century that made the U.S. economy so vulnerable. Overstretched borrowers were bound to start defaulting in large numbers once the housing bubble burst and unemployment began to rise.
These defaults in turn wreaked havoc with a financial system that — also mainly thanks to Reagan-era deregulation — took on too much risk with too little capital.
There’s plenty of blame to go around these days. But the prime villains behind the mess we’re in were Reagan and his circle of advisers — men who forgot the lessons of America’s last great financial crisis, and condemned the rest of us to repeat it.
As I wrote yesterday today I had volleyball tournament so I didn’t have time for poker. Tournament was good. We had nice sunny weather and our team finished on 4th place. Tournament finished in the evening and after that we went to pub to drink some beers with friends, but every body was very tired so we went home early.
Tomorrow I want to play cashgame session and watch some more videos.
Lifetime goal: Run like artanis in flips
Lifetime goal2: Play like djforever on 6max
Lifetime goal3: Play HUs like Fayth
Goal for 2009: NL200 till the end of 2009
Goal2 for 2009: Make 200k vpps and buy 2k milestone
Goal for june: try to be break even and make 50k fpps which I need to buy June 2,4k instant cash bonus (down like 1k already ).
brag: just got 100k "free" fpps cause I reached supernova which I missed by 500 vpps last year .
full story: http://www.liquidpoker.net/blog/viewblog.php?id=640332
Pokerstars keeps me ultra happy, I think I'll stay with PS forever
5/28-6/1 Bellagio/Rio 5/10 NL cash game recapsby I_run_godlike, June 03
The cash game has been quite swingy for me as well. Lost 800 the first day at Rio's 2/5 6max, up about 2900 from 5/10 and then proceed to lose 2200 the night before I came back to LA.
I don't know if I remember all of the big pot or interesting hands but I'll try my best.
5/29 Rio's 2/5 6max.
Players were just incredibly horrible, just as any other live FR players who are loose/passive/weak. They use their "FR standard" to play the 6 max. An old guy sat directly to my left is a total non-believer, literally playing 90/5 style. After my 85o cracked his A4dd on 8s 5d 6h Jd Xs board where he flat my flop cbet and shoved on the turn, he went on tilt against me. So this hand happened just few orbits after the hand. I opened utg to 20 w/ JJ, he flat, btn flat and bb flat. 85 to the flop. Flop came T84r, I cbet 60 and he flats, turn a 6, I led 160 into 200 and he shoved for 200 more, I obv instant called. River T and he flipped KTo. wp sir.
5/30 Rio's 5/10 FR.
Right after I busted out from the 1k donkament and was waiting for my friend, decided to play some live cash to kill time. A new game just started so I picked my seat. on the 3rd hand, I got dealt AA in utg2. UTG1 opened to 30 (w/ 1k eff. stack), I 3bet to 105 and folded to sb (who's a donk/station with 1200 eff stack) cold called. pfr also flat. $325 to the flop. Flop came 66d9d and I have two red Aces. Sb led out 200 and pfr instant jammed for 1k, I snapped and sb folded. turn and river bricked off and pfr turned over 78dd and my AA incredibly dodged trillion outs and held up. pfr started to berate and said something like..you called that?!?! I was like..yea, ez call sir, snap and fist pump. He's like..do you call if I crai? I replied, even faster sir, I never fold there. He then went on tilt and I left the very next hand cuz my friend was here for lunch (First time ever that I hit and ran somebody)
5/31 Bellagio 5/10 FR
down 2k right off the bat (don't really want to talk about the hand that I stacked off 1500 with but I think it was okay) Anyway..I kept grinding and grinding and finally after 7 hours of sitting on the same table, I was up 100. One interesting hand was that a new guy who just sat down couple orbits ago opened to 40 and co and btn both called. (btn had eff. stack of 4k and I covered him) I flat in bb w/ J5cc. flop 67c9c...I decided to play this pot cautiously. It was checked to btn who bet 100 into 160 and i tanked and flat. pfr then announced raise to 350 (leaving him 650 left) and btn folded, ez decision for me then, I then announced all in and pfr called. turn 5 river J...I turned over my two pair and pfr said it's good and I shipped a decent size pot which brought my winning to about 1700 for the night.
2nd interesting hand I played was that utg opened to 45, 2 callers and btn (4k eff stack) called and I flat T8ss in bb. flop AsKs7 and was checked to btn who instant bet 200 into 225. I tanked for 30 secs before calling (didn't want to make it too obv that I was drawing), everyone folded. Turn 6c which gave me 3 extra outs. I checked and btn instant bet 300 into 625 (weird size...but he's a live donk so he probably doesn't know how bet sizing works). I tanked and called, river brought an offsuit T (damn, for 1 sec, I thought I got the miracle offsuit 9!) I checked again and btn instant bet 500, I tanked and folded. Spent 500 on a draw hoping I can ship his 4k over..sigh...
3rd hand I shipped 1200 w/ my AA and bb's AK on K44 board.
the last hand of the night which totally killed my mood was that I opened 45 utg1 w/ two black QQ and got 3 callers.
$180 to the flop and the board was Qh79h, I obv didn't really like the flop that much but still can't complain about the top set. Given how cordinated the board was, I led 150 into 180 and got one caller who just sat down few hands ago. After he called, I asked how many bills he was playing and he replied 6 (makes it 1500 to start with). Turn brought the ugliest card in the deck: 8h. I thought for a little bit and decided to go for a check/raise. So I checked and he jokingly asked me how much i had and i said I had him covered. he threw out his bills and I crai and got snap called and he turned A5hh for the nut flush. Needless to say, I never bink when I need to.
LP is my favorite fucking placeby GirlsRVicious, June 03
Variance has a big brother named doomswitch - edzwoo
Poker....
I fucking hate you
For something so easy
You are so hard
Fuck you variance
Fuck you doomswitch
Fuck me for being a pussy
Quit fucking whining you bitch
Fuck you poker
Neat little poem I wrote
Oh yea fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, you're cool I'm out
No graphs or session stats, since I'm recreating my HEM database, so here's a pretty lame blog post. Dropped roughly 2bi due to bad play (3betting some people too much and not keeping track of it) and a bit of run bad, but it really wasn't a big deal. I also had no HUD, and it made me a bit uncomfortable to play. I think I played about 1200 hands or so.
I don't think they are tough enough for regular forums. If anyone thinks its low stakes worthy than tell me and I might move it.
Hand1: Standard bluff 3bet against a wide range opener who has like 75+% fold to 3bet stats, 0 bluff 4bets expected.
1) Cbet - Should I make it bigger on Non-AK Board to generate more FE?
2)The Turn. I think this should have been a second barell.
I will be Bet/calling most of the time here right?
What should be the sizing of the barrel, can I make it big as I will call a shove anyway? + Show Spoiler +
Submitted by : LemOn[5thF]
PokerStars Game #28912372287: Holdem No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2009/06/02 15:31:18 ET
Table Hippokoon VIII 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: DoC.LemOn ($27.85 in chips)
Seat 3: callit08 ($21 in chips)
Seat 4: stonermacca ($26.85 in chips)
Seat 5: ANNEGEPUNKT ($22.90 in chips)
Seat 6: sb222 ($25.15 in chips)
sb222: posts small blind $0.10
DoC.LemOn: posts big blind $0.25
gunsmoke166: sits out
Holecards(Odds) Dealt to DoC.LemOn
callit08: folds
stonermacca: folds
ANNEGEPUNKT: raises $0.50 to $0.75
sb222: folds
DoC.LemOn: raises $1.70 to $2.45
ANNEGEPUNKT: calls $1.70
DoC.LemOn: bets $8
ANNEGEPUNKT: raises $8 to $16
DoC.LemOn: raises $6.10 to $22.10 and is all-in
ANNEGEPUNKT: calls $1.15 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($4.95) returned to DoC.LemOn
Showdown DoC.LemOn: shows (a flush, Ace high)
ANNEGEPUNKT: shows (a pair of Aces)
DoC.LemOn collected $43.90 from pot
Summary Total pot $45.90 | Rake $2
Board
Seat 1: DoC.LemOn (big blind) showed and won ($43.90) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 3: callit08 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: stonermacca folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: ANNEGEPUNKT (button) showed and lost with a pair of Aces
Seat 6: sb222 (small blind) folded before Flop
]
hand2
1) PF- the original caller was pretty tight UTG so squeeze is out of the question.
Do we have the implied odds to call PF with one gappers?
2) River. I think that the flush here is very believable. Would you make the bluff here and how much do you bet? ( I think that $3.80 is ideal) Would you ever over bet in this situation?
PokerStars Game #28913608355: Holdem No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2009/06/02 16:01:10 ET
Table Cheruskia V 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: rytiifr ($10 in chips)
Seat 2: xTripple_Ax ($9.65 in chips)
Seat 3: DoC.LemOn ($25 in chips)
Seat 4: napmaster1 ($54.95 in chips)
Seat 5: blondi104 ($24.05 in chips)
Seat 6: Eileenchen26 ($15.80 in chips)
xTripple_Ax: posts small blind $0.10
DoC.LemOn: posts big blind $0.25
PokerStars Game #28910582827: Holdem No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2009/06/02 14:48:20 ET
Table Algebar VII 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Asadz ($4.75 in chips)
Seat 2: DoC.LemOn ($25 in chips)
Seat 4: drdeciton ($19.75 in chips)
Seat 5: PopaS777 ($8.65 in chips)
Seat 6: Novgorodka ($25 in chips)
Asadz: posts small blind $0.10
DoC.LemOn: posts big blind $0.25
RemcoB: sits out
Holecards Dealt to DoC.LemOn
drdeciton: raises $0.25 to $0.50
PopaS777: folds
Novgorodka: folds
Asadz: folds
DoC.LemOn: raises $1.20 to $1.70
drdeciton: raises $1.20 to $2.90
DoC.LemOn: calls $1.20
Flop (Pot : $5.90)
DoC.LemOn: checks
drdeciton: bets $16.85 and is all-in
DoC.LemOn:
]
Hand4: A Special Treat for Pwners.
I am not requesting a line check. I want to take the line as a given and say in which specific situations would it be viable, against what opponent, what table dynamics and when would you make the river call and why.
PokerStars Game #28913428925: Holdem No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2009/06/02 15:56:46 ET
Table Paris X 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: grabberch ($31.90 in chips)
Seat 2: xTripple_Ax ($9.75 in chips)
Seat 3: Watt ($25.35 in chips)
Seat 4: DoC.LemOn ($29.25 in chips)
Seat 5: polvos12 ($14.55 in chips)
Seat 6: Alliinwith22 ($38.15 in chips)
xTripple_Ax: posts small blind $0.10
Watt: posts big blind $0.25
Holecards Dealt to DoC.LemOn
DoC.LemOn: raises $0.75 to $1
polvos12: folds
Alliinwith22: folds
grabberch: calls $1
xTripple_Ax: folds
Watt: folds
today way okay pokerwise...
i was tired and didnt play my A game
still + 82$
which puts June + 253$ so far after 2/2 days
I definitely hope to make up for my lazy may ^^
Finally i bought a new computer ( wanted to do this for the last 2-3 months but somehow wasnt too happy with a system)
Finally i found one that is probably pretty good + cheap