1
 |
gawdawaful   Canada. Nov 29 2008 05:50. Posts 9015 | | | |
|
| Im only good at poker when I run good | Last edit: 13/09/2021 15:49 |
|
|
0
 |
dogmeat   Czech Republic. Nov 29 2008 06:05. Posts 6374 | | |
?
it doesnt seem like u were allin |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Babs   Australia. Nov 29 2008 06:23. Posts 1178 | | | |
|
| Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake - Napolean Bonaparte | |
|
|
1
 |
capaneo   Canada. Nov 29 2008 06:28. Posts 8465 | | |
I really tried to care about ur downswing but I couldnts. |
|
| In US everyone is happy as long as all the prices are rising. Unless its crude oil - Marc Faber | |
|
|
1
 |
Patrocle   France. Nov 29 2008 07:11. Posts 623 | | |
You can help getting this soft better using http://holdemmanager.uservoice.com/ (this is not a stupid rick-roll thing), and especially the all-in ev calculatoir (in multi-way pot, it does take shortstack into account as if there were full stack). With a friend from the french liquidpoker, we had this thread:EV in all-in pots.
What you basically would like is not an EV calculator in the sense of HEM, but a Sklansky Buck's calculator, based in the decisions taken on each streets, correct me if I'm wrong. I think that there exists only one soft of this kind, "Divat", managed by Alberta's university, but it works only for Limit Hold'em Head's up poker. |
|
| An apple a day keeps the doctor away | |
|
|
1
 |
Jelle   Belgium. Nov 29 2008 08:06. Posts 3476 | | |
u ran below expectation over 1500 hands? unheard of |
| |
|
|
1
 |
PplusAD   Germany. Nov 29 2008 08:22. Posts 7182 | | |
I think the point is HEM EV is not very accurate ?
Hem says his ev vor the AQ vs A5 hand is - 136$
but thats bullshit ofc since when the most of the money got in on flop he was a favourite. |
|
| U see what i did there with A8 ? He 4 bets and there we go insta jam A8 : ---booooom -- . hahahaha ( Krantz) | |
|
|
1
 |
the cleaner   Germany. Nov 29 2008 10:07. Posts 3014 | | |
clean your desktop dude 
|
|
| there are no facts only interpretations | |
|
|
0
 |
dogmeat   Czech Republic. Nov 29 2008 11:33. Posts 6374 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
 |
gawdawaful   Canada. Nov 29 2008 13:15. Posts 9015 | | |
| | On November 29 2008 07:22 PplusAD wrote:
I think the point is HEM EV is not very accurate ?
Hem says his ev vor the AQ vs A5 hand is - 136$
but thats bullshit ofc since when the most of the money got in on flop he was a favourite. |
ding ding ding
I dont know what Jelle is babbling about, the whine blog is the one below not this one. |
|
| Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
 |
Maynard!   United States. Nov 29 2008 16:45. Posts 4453 | | |
EV is good for what it calculates: all-in equity. Beyond that it is useless. If you put in 999 dollars on the flop, he hits turn, and you pop in 1 more on turn to go AI it'll calculate based on turn percentages which will show you as huge dog even tho he essentially sucked out.
What is 100% useless is the sklansky bucks calculations. |
|
| Now I really am a busto. Thanks FTP. | |
|
|
1
 |
Patrocle   France. Nov 29 2008 20:31. Posts 623 | | |
| | On November 29 2008 15:45 Maynard! wrote:
EV is good for what it calculates: all-in equity. Beyond that it is useless. If you put in 999 dollars on the flop, he hits turn, and you pop in 1 more on turn to go AI it'll calculate based on turn percentages which will show you as huge dog even tho he essentially sucked out.
What is 100% useless is the sklansky bucks calculations. |
Hmm, that's complicated cause with sklansky bucks, you should put your opponent on a range, and not on the exact actual hand that vilain has like PokerEv does. |
|
| An apple a day keeps the doctor away | |
|
|
1
| |
no sklansky bucks are calculated vs the exact hand your opponent happened to have |
|
|
|