Graph related Q...

breakeven on non-sd is fine imo. depending on how you are playing pf and they type of games you are in. looks like you are playing a nice low variance solid winning style
here's mine NL100 FR:

I've been messing around trying to push nits off hands, and playing like 20/15 at full tables.

obv if you look at the extreme case of a play money table where no one ever folds then all of your winnings have to come from showdown. so breakeven on non-sd is pretty good.

that's actually really good.
how do you do so well in non sd pots?

looks good. to compare here is what mine looks like over ~100k sample. (2PTBB/100)



comes down to a matter of style really. do you want to win pots bluffing people off their midstrength hands? or just cooler them with sets/higher overpairs. both work pretty good lol. looks like your graph is like halfway between mine and silvers =D

O_O
How do you guys have break-even and even positive w/o showdown winnings.. My graph looks like lachlan's most of the time...

because you fold too much

On September 11 2008 04:04 lazymej wrote: O_O How do you guys have break-even and even positive w/o showdown winnings.. My graph looks like lachlan's most of the time...

hand sample, sacrificing showdown winnings for non-showdown winnings (or offset losses), and probably also more balls to pull off sweet bluffs lol

very poorly disguised brag IMO

looks fine.

if ure that much - $$$ in non showdown winnings liek lachlan
-> means ure a giant nit and fold way too much

However if he is still winning its okay i guess

On September 11 2008 05:13 PplusAD wrote: looks fine. if ure that much - $$$ in non showdown winnings liek lachlan -> means ure a giant nit and fold way too much However if he is still winning its okay i guess

haha yea, but look at my sweet showdown winnings! i put my heart and soul into getting that

if only i could eliminate my red line i would be 10k richer T_T

On September 11 2008 03:39 Exhilarate wrote: that's actually really good. how do you do so well in non sd pots?

good game theory understanding and decent hand reading.

i don't know exactly what means that you have negative non showdown winnings but i have like 350k hands on 1/2 6 max and i am a good winner there(4.5/100) and like 100k hands on 2/4 6max where i do also fine(2.5/100) and my non showdown winnings are ALWAYS negative

On September 11 2008 06:15 Cro)Deadman wrote: Show nested quote + On September 11 2008 03:39 Exhilarate wrote: that's actually really good. how do you do so well in non sd pots? good game theory understanding and decent hand reading.

lol.

move up to 1-2 nit

On September 11 2008 09:07 Syntax wrote: Show nested quote + On September 11 2008 06:15 Cro)Deadman wrote:   On September 11 2008 03:39 Exhilarate wrote: that's actually really good. how do you do so well in non sd pots? good game theory understanding and decent hand reading. lol.

its a obv level.

For some reason, i have a hard time believing that you don't actually think you're good at poker.

Oh yeah, that's right, because you're full of shit.

lol wut,i am good at poker,im just not as good in poker as I want to be tho...

2 big diffrences.

and that really is a level and its kinda hard to understand why but I think exhil will pick up on it if he gives it any thought.

everyone nitty at fr ez to get non-showdown in the black