https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 458 Active, 2 Logged in - Time: 20:35

best site right now? - Page 4

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > Main Poker
  First 
  < 
  1 
  2 
  3 
 4 
  5 
  > 
  Last 
  All 
doriipoker   Iceland. Dec 03 2011 19:04. Posts 140


  On December 03 2011 10:08 bigredhoss wrote:
Show nested quote +



are you implying nazgul would allow a black man to take advantage of him?


hahah


Target-x17   Canada. Dec 03 2011 21:07. Posts 1027

in before heros poker ceo

f u bw rock 

tutz2   Brasil. Dec 05 2011 09:19. Posts 4

lol this is so ridiculous
now I'm banned for 14 days because of that ? really ?
had no idea LP mods could be like this, might as well ban me for life now

message on my inbox was: "stop being a dick thanks"
yeah right I'm the dick here? pfff

for whoever banned me congrats! you are so freaking powerful omg



User was banned - multiaccount.

 Last edit: 05/12/2011 12:46

TalentedTom    Canada. Dec 05 2011 09:59. Posts 20070

dont let the man hold you down tutz

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same 

RaiNKhAN    United States. Dec 05 2011 10:21. Posts 4080

lmao tutz gettin the gavel

The biggest Rockets, Sixers, and Grizzlies fan you will ever meet! 

Nazgul    Netherlands. Dec 05 2011 11:13. Posts 7080


  On December 05 2011 08:19 tutz2 wrote:
lol this is so ridiculous
now I'm banned for 14 days because of that ? really ?
had no idea LP mods could be like this, might as well ban me for life now

message on my inbox was: "stop being a dick thanks"
yeah right I'm the dick here? pfff

for whoever banned me congrats! you are so freaking powerful omg



Second ban was me, forgot to sign it with my name. If you want feedback just shoot me a PM, but I think it should be rather obvious.

You almost twin-caracked his AK - JonnyCosmoLast edit: 05/12/2011 11:15

jeffv8x_-_16   Belgium. Dec 05 2011 11:33. Posts 2835

Didn't know tutz was black.

how can u shove the river, he cant possibly call with worse -TalentedTom 

tutz2   Brasil. Dec 05 2011 12:02. Posts 4

doublepost

 Last edit: 05/12/2011 12:03

tutz2   Brasil. Dec 05 2011 12:03. Posts 4


  On December 05 2011 10:13 Nazgul wrote:
Show nested quote +



Second ban was me, forgot to sign it with my name. If you want feedback just shoot me a PM, but I think it should be rather obvious.


Nazgul, the reason is obvious but that is the kinda of thing I didnt expect to get a ban for here on LP

In other forums mods are so ridic that they make the forum fucking boring, u have to be careful about everything that u say cause mods are just assholes with the power to ban you and they will do it as much as they can because fuck they can. That is not the image I had on LP, thats why I liked here so much. I still do, just not as much as before.


maryn   Poland. Dec 05 2011 12:56. Posts 1208

lol online poker is becoming a big joke


  Most Sites - Move to contributed rakeback
OnGame - Essence
iPoker - Penalizing sites with net withdrawals which resulted in winning players getting booted, switching to Essence-type system
Microgaming - Some anonymous tables, adding more
Bodog - Hiding tables from lobby, making all tables anonymous
Everleaf - Capping winnings



+ bossmedia making separate tables for 1tabling people now, ps seems to be only reasonable choice nowadays.


EvilSky    Czech Republic. Dec 05 2011 13:27. Posts 8918

yeah its pretty sad, but contributed rakeback is awesome tho :D


el_tilon   Canada. Dec 05 2011 14:32. Posts 296

this thread it's over, 2340234019410 comments about tutz, btw the best sites at the moment are pokerstars and ongame imo

THE TILTMONKEY MASTER 

SpasticInk   Sweden. Dec 05 2011 18:53. Posts 6298


  On December 05 2011 12:27 EvilSky wrote:
yeah its pretty sad, but contributed rakeback is awesome tho :D



really?

people dont understand there is a differnce between paid rake and contributed rake.

i remember when FTP changed their system, it hurt my rakeback a lot even though my own rake paid > MGR.

obviously depends on how good you are running to some level, but still...


asdf2000   United States. Dec 05 2011 19:50. Posts 7708

retarded ban

Grindin so hard, Im smashin pussies left and right. 

EvilSky    Czech Republic. Dec 05 2011 20:02. Posts 8918


  On December 05 2011 17:53 SpasticInk wrote:
Show nested quote +



really?

people dont understand there is a differnce between paid rake and contributed rake.

i remember when FTP changed their system, it hurt my rakeback a lot even though my own rake paid > MGR.

obviously depends on how good you are running to some level, but still...



Im not sure I understand, the way I get it is with contributed the looser players will get more than with dealt and the ones it hurts are the nitty mass tablers (which Im ok with ) . Maybe there is something Im missing tho if you can explain Id appreciate it.


capaneo   Canada. Dec 05 2011 22:31. Posts 8465

You have problem with the moddeing on this site then express it, if things changed then good for you, if not, then dont fucking come to this site. Its called free world. (personally I dont come here as often for a bunch of reasons and thats one of them)

In US everyone is happy as long as all the prices are rising. Unless its crude oil - Marc Faber 

whamm!   Albania. Dec 05 2011 22:54. Posts 11625

contributed has been discussed over and over already. loose players get less rb, nits get slightly less and continue to play that way, recreational fish dont get shit (and prob dont care anyway), site makes more money skimming off the top of everyone's mgr. nothing changes.
in theory it looks like a good thing(for the games), but really its just a sly way of making more money for the site

 Last edit: 05/12/2011 22:54

EvilSky    Czech Republic. Dec 06 2011 06:13. Posts 8918


  On December 05 2011 21:54 whamm! wrote:
contributed has been discussed over and over already. loose players get less rb, nits get slightly less and continue to play that way, recreational fish dont get shit (and prob dont care anyway), site makes more money skimming off the top of everyone's mgr. nothing changes.
in theory it looks like a good thing(for the games), but really its just a sly way of making more money for the site


It has been discussed but apparently people who say its worse off for everyone never elaborate on how or why...


whamm!   Albania. Dec 06 2011 06:37. Posts 11625

thats why its fucked up. on paper its good but on their hem and rb received they approx get like 20% on ftp and cant expalin why lol


SpasticInk   Sweden. Dec 06 2011 11:42. Posts 6298

what whamm! says is correct. we don't need to derail this thread obviously but what he said is true which makes it worse, dont you think (looose palyers get less rakeback, nit's get lesser, and recreational fish who contributes to the most rake gets shit because they don't have a deal)

hence worse for all. winner = the site.

your assumption that you get more if you are loose is incorrect in one sense, sure - you get more than the nit, but less than with a standard deal. of course this differs a bit from limit to limit, because lower limits are infested with more fish (who plays like 50/0+).

but yeah this is taken mainly from my own experience when sites go from dealt to contributed. I am neither loose nor nitty (plays like 25/20) and I always have a higher rake paid (not the same as contributed) than MGR. and when they changed the system I got less rake.


 
  First 
  < 
  1 
  2 
  3 
 4 
  5 
  > 
  Last 
  All 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2025. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap