AdAs by Rocko - Page 2

vs passives at Nl50 this is close imo. a lot of you are underestimating the nittiness and passiveness of NL50 regulars or what not. and Since you have A of diamonds semi bluffs are like non exsistant in his range. So it's more likely made hands.

that said i'd prolly call and fold to further big action on the turn.

even if vilain has a set you have 11 outs. I would shove. if your properly rolled you wouldnt be such a nit for 1 buyin . Dont be so depressed about poker. if it affects you that much, dont play its not worth it. gl.

On November 21 2008 11:06 SakiSaki wrote: thanks for putting me on sick tilt. Atleast call the raise man wtf

You have 34% equity versus KK/99/33 that flopped a set, so shoving can never be bad, given that there is a good amount of money in the pot. Also, I would expect a bigger raise with a set. I lean towards a shove.

If you are REALLY REALLY scared, at least call the raise seeing as you have outs coming out of your ears and have the necessary odds.

Don't fold though please...

i autoshove here all day every day
well, except maybe... once

On November 21 2008 17:04 YoMeR wrote: vs passives at Nl50 this is close imo. a lot of you are underestimating the nittiness and passiveness of NL50 regulars or what not. and Since you have A of diamonds semi bluffs are like non exsistant in his range. So it's more likely made hands. that said i'd prolly call and fold to further big action on the turn.

On November 21 2008 02:12 lostaccount wrote: Show nested quote + On November 21 2008 02:07 traxamillion wrote:   On November 21 2008 02:03 lostaccount wrote: Either shoving and folding is fine, i did the math. then shove is better not really when its 0ev, i rather fold because it reduce the variance since i play worst if im stuck.

shove to get fpps and buy a range rover

On November 21 2008 17:04 YoMeR wrote: vs passives at Nl50 this is close imo. a lot of you are underestimating the nittiness and passiveness of NL50 regulars or what not. and Since you have A of diamonds semi bluffs are like non exsistant in his range. So it's more likely made hands. that said i'd prolly call and fold to further big action on the turn.

this seems like spew to me

I mean, you're never going to want to fold if you miss on the turn anyway. over 1/2 your stack will be sitting in the middle..?

SHOVEEEEEEEEEEEEE WTFFF

i really dont see how you can fold this....and believe me i am nitlife at times.

On November 21 2008 12:04 geometryb wrote: i don't think i've ever folded here. but maybe fullring is different.

Its VERY different.

stop fucking playing fullring

and yeah I feel like you're probably beat here, folding isn't therrible

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

15,840 games 0.005 secs 3,168,000 games/sec

Board: Kd 9d 3d
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 58.636% 56.65% 01.99% 8973 315.00 { AdAs }
Hand 1: 41.364% 39.38% 01.99% 6237 315.00 { QQ+, 99, 33 }


---

i dont see how do u ever ever ever fold here

if i have 5k on the table and it will be my all bankroll i will still shove this hand..doesnt metter if it is fullring or 6 game.

On November 22 2008 16:16 marllboro wrote: if i have 5k on the table and it will be my all bankroll i will still shove this hand..doesnt metter if it is fullring or 6 game.

why would you play with your whole roll at 1 table?

just saying lol

I shove

shove, or at least call and evaluate the turn.

The real question here is, why play FR?