On September 19 2017 23:34 Mortensen8 wrote:
So being a mere neuroscientist makes him incapable of looking at their studies and calling out their bullshit manipulation with their numbers? Also I know sophistry when I see it that shills reputation is on the line please refer to where he prescribes alternative therapies and doesn't just suggest that people eat things high in k2 so the calcium gets absorbed.
On September 19 2017 23:50 Mortensen8 wrote:
Yes I have a lot of respect for people who go against the system. The second you go against the dogma your reputation is ruined you recieve no funding much easier to just be a shill and manipulatet results
Yes, I know. Everything is black and white for you and involves some form of conspiracy, including the peer-review process. You have no respect for science, but when it suits you, you assume the role of the guy who knows who are the good scientists and who isn't. It doesn't matter that these people are obvious hucksters who get caught red-handed lying or misrepresenting the science, you have more respect for any random moron who goes against the scientific consensus because you can relate to them due to your own hero syndrome.
fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount
A butter shill I'm sure he gave up his reputation for the butter industry as opposed to the statins available for only 4 measly dollars that 25% of adults are taking and increasing to 50% in the future. It is high body fat and inactivity it's what I've said all along. Yes enough now can't be bothered.
On September 20 2017 00:05 Mortensen8 wrote:
A butter shill I'm sure he gave up his reputation for the butter industry as opposed to the statins available for only 4 measly dollars that 25% of adults are taking and increasing to 50% in the future. It is high body fat and inactivity it's what I've said all along. Yes enough now can't be bothered.
He's a psychology prof dude, not an MD. He's not taken out for lunch by big pharma, he can't prescribe statins.
fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount
Whatever bro you as usual don't address the actual points made and instead google for something that backs you up then you call me lazy for doing it then you use appeal to authority then you use guilt by association then you link to nutritionfacts as usual. It's probably because you didn't watch the video. I can't be bothered it's not going anywhere so I won't address you. It's actually funny the vegans in that comment section say the same thing about ravnskov where are you getting this? why do you say the same thing? who the fuck is ravnskov maybe I should listen to him.
Rear naked woke
Last edit: 20/09/2017 02:04
1
LikeASet United States. Sep 20 2017 03:57. Posts 2113
On September 19 2017 20:09 Mortensen8 wrote:
Oh fuck off baal you can't pathologize people based on message board posts if that were the case basically everyone is a 'psycopath' on the internet besides I'm writing about things I believe are best for society in the future something sociopaths don't give a shit about. The views may be contrary to humanism but that's because of the nature of the natural world is not a fluffy feel good bullshit and I'm seeing a brutal downfall of this unnatural system soon.
Dude you have some social darwinist ideas that are giving hitler's ghost a boner.
I call you a psychopath because you show a huge lack of empathy, I mean perhaps you dont have a conditions, I've had weird darwinist ideas when I was a teen but I dont think you have youth as an excuse anymore, so you are either a psychopath or you are trying hard not to understand the human condition and not to feel suffering, perhaps its your mechanism to cope with it.
On September 19 2017 20:09 Mortensen8 wrote:
Oh fuck off baal you can't pathologize people based on message board posts if that were the case basically everyone is a 'psycopath' on the internet besides I'm writing about things I believe are best for society in the future something sociopaths don't give a shit about. The views may be contrary to humanism but that's because of the nature of the natural world is not a fluffy feel good bullshit and I'm seeing a brutal downfall of this unnatural system soon.
Dude you some social darwinist ideas that they are giving hitler's ghost a boner.
I call you a psychopath because you show a huge lack of empathy, I mean perhaps you dont have a conditions, I've had weird darwinist ideas when I was a teen but I dont think you have youth as an excuse anymore, so you are either a psychopath or you are trying hard not to understand the human condition and not to feel suffering, perhaps its your mechanism to cope with it.
dude Hitler is his bro if you went to the gym 24/7 to pump those testosterone lvls up you'd understand but you see you've fallen for the slave mentality. Try saying cuck/beta in arguments and posting memes to make points like every other unique thinker
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man...
In other news, someone I know started a debate that deals with the concept of truth based on the Harris/Peterson Podcast. It's structured in a way as to give both of them plenty of time to research and think in between statements. Here are the introduction statements (the rest will follow on the same channel):
fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount
On September 20 2017 00:52 Mortensen8 wrote:
Whatever bro you as usual don't address the actual points made and instead google for something that backs you up then you call me lazy for doing it then you use appeal to authority then you use guilt by association then you link to nutritionfacts as usual. It's probably because you didn't watch the video. I can't be bothered it's not going anywhere so I won't address you. It's actually funny the vegans in that comment section say the same thing about ravnskov where are you getting this? why do you say the same thing? who the fuck is ravnskov maybe I should listen to him.
I explicitly told you that I didn't watch your dumb video... I also gave you the link that exposes Ravnskov. Btw, your boy Salatin lost his only debate with vegans, even though he had one of the most competent anti-vegan co-debaters on his team.
fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount
On September 20 2017 16:39 Loco wrote:
In other news, someone I know started a debate that deals with the concept of truth based on the Harris/Peterson Podcast. It's structured in a way as to give both of them plenty of time to research and think in between statements. Here are the introduction statements (the rest will follow on the same channel):
what's your take on this Loco?
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man...
On September 20 2017 16:39 Loco wrote:
In other news, someone I know started a debate that deals with the concept of truth based on the Harris/Peterson Podcast. It's structured in a way as to give both of them plenty of time to research and think in between statements. Here are the introduction statements (the rest will follow on the same channel):
what's your take on this Loco?
I watched them a few days ago so it's not completely fresh in my mind, but I believe there is truth on both sides. I don't like the insistence on describing which concept of truth is more valid or important, though. It creates a separation that I don't think exists (obviously, I think we should distinguish them, but not value them separately). I think Fred's outlining of a biologically evolved morality has substance to it, I have only just started learning more on the subject. I'm currently studying Edgar Morin, who refers to this idea as self-(geno-pheno)-organisation in his main work, but I haven't reached the part where he goes deeply into it. I'm sure I'll have more to say on this in a month or two once I've finished it (it's a 2600 pages mammoth of a work).
One thing's for sure, Fred's take on the matter was more intelligible to me than anything Petersen said in his talk, to the point where I'm wondering if he's not arguing something completely different than Peterson did. It's not clear to me how he managed to get there from anything Petersen said. Peterson said some things with regards to empirical truths that I find objectionable. Philip did a good job pointing out the obvious on that front, such as the fact that scientists aren't in the business of establishing "incontrovertible truths".
fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount
On September 20 2017 16:39 Loco wrote:
In other news, someone I know started a debate that deals with the concept of truth based on the Harris/Peterson Podcast. It's structured in a way as to give both of them plenty of time to research and think in between statements. Here are the introduction statements (the rest will follow on the same channel):
what's your take on this Loco?
I don't like the insistence on describing which concept of truth is more valid or important, though.
“Starting in college, I began looking for real answers to my everyday problems,” says Schmidt, a chiropractor and nutritionist based in Ann Arbor, Michigan. “After 10 years of going through all of this seeking and searching and various therapies, I was worse. And then I got into Scientology and that’s when I got the real live solutions.”
I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson
How nice of you to google him and cherry pick something you think discredits a man that helped me lose 40 kg's since April. I dont think some innocent religion matters. Should I not have believed im him if he was a jew ?
No discredit (didn't watch, no idea what convo is even about). First thing that came up when I googled him and lol'd
I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson
