On January 13 2015 17:58 Floofy wrote:
So if i'm not mistaken, on DraftKings, We can still bet on Uriah Hall, but we cant bet on his new opponement?
No. Think about what you wrote.
You need two to tango.
David S (DraftKings)
Jan 13 10:37 PM
Good Evening,
You can still pick Uriah Hall and you will receive points for his fight. However, we do not change our player pool once it is established no matter what. Since Stallings replaced Taylor after we published our Player Pool Stallings will not be available to choose from. Further, we have listed Taylor as out but we won't be removing him from the Player Pool. If you do choose Taylor you won't receive any points since he is not fighting.
I don't really follow UFC at all, but I am intrigued by it and scim the threads every week. One thing I wonder though is why doesn't anyone ever have a losing record?
Last edit: 13/01/2015 23:20
3
PuertoRican United States. Jan 13 2015 23:22. Posts 13051
On January 13 2015 17:58 Floofy wrote:
So if i'm not mistaken, on DraftKings, We can still bet on Uriah Hall, but we cant bet on his new opponement?
No. Think about what you wrote.
You need two to tango.
David S (DraftKings)
Jan 13 10:37 PM
Good Evening,
You can still pick Uriah Hall and you will receive points for his fight. However, we do not change our player pool once it is established no matter what. Since Stallings replaced Taylor after we published our Player Pool Stallings will not be available to choose from. Further, we have listed Taylor as out but we won't be removing him from the Player Pool. If you do choose Taylor you won't receive any points since he is not fighting.
Let me know if you have any more questions!
David S
Customer Experience Associate
DraftKings Inc
This is another reason why DraftKings is flawed... They knew about the replacement 5-days in advance, yet they won't change it on their website so Hall's new opponent is able to be picked.
I think its almost close to a flip whether siver can get to second round, i really think once the fight starts hes gonna panick a bit, starts throwing alot of leg kicks since his punches won't really reach connor.........
ok its not going to second round
3
PuertoRican United States. Jan 13 2015 23:29. Posts 13051
On January 13 2015 22:20 Trav94 wrote:
I don't really follow UFC at all, but I am intrigued by it and scim the threads every week. One thing I wonder though is why doesn't anyone ever have a losing record?
Which record are you referring to?
Rekrul is a newb
4
TianYuan Korea (South). Jan 14 2015 02:13. Posts 6817
On January 13 2015 22:20 Trav94 wrote:
I don't really follow UFC at all, but I am intrigued by it and scim the threads every week. One thing I wonder though is why doesn't anyone ever have a losing record?
Because you dont generally get to the UFC with a losing record, the UFC is the biggest league, if you have a sub 50-50 record it probably means you are on the regional circuit.
Hm.. Off-suite socks..
4
JonnyCosMo United States. Jan 14 2015 04:29. Posts 7292
On January 13 2015 22:20 Trav94 wrote:
I don't really follow UFC at all, but I am intrigued by it and scim the threads every week. One thing I wonder though is why doesn't anyone ever have a losing record?
Because you dont generally get to the UFC with a losing record, the UFC is the biggest league, if you have a sub 50-50 record it probably means you are on the regional circuit.
Or it means ur Mark Hunt before he went on his win streak
Everyone needs to see that you are king of the castle - PoorUser
On January 14 2015 12:35 gebbstet wrote:
If any of those two fighters sucks its definitely Boetsch.
Thanks champ that might be why he's an underdog.
Okey my comment was pretty dumb but why would you say thales sucks? Boetsch has looked horrible lately and should be 1-4 in his last 5 fights but got a robbery win against CB. Meanwhile Thales leites has done good in all of the fights I´ve seen and can remeber, 9-2 in UFC with 1 loss to Anderson Silva and a split decision loss to Alessio sakara.
3
PuertoRican United States. Jan 15 2015 05:52. Posts 13051
On January 14 2015 12:35 gebbstet wrote:
If any of those two fighters sucks its definitely Boetsch.
Thanks champ that might be why he's an underdog.
Okey my comment was pretty dumb but why would you say thales sucks? Boetsch has looked horrible lately and should be 1-4 in his last 5 fights but got a robbery win against CB. Meanwhile Thales leites has done good in all of the fights I´ve seen and can remeber, 9-2 in UFC with 1 loss to Anderson Silva and a split decision loss to Alessio sakara.
I think they're both not very good so I'm really trying to figure out whether Boetsch should be as big of an underdog as he is.
On January 14 2015 12:35 gebbstet wrote:
If any of those two fighters sucks its definitely Boetsch.
Thanks champ that might be why he's an underdog.
Okey my comment was pretty dumb but why would you say thales sucks? Boetsch has looked horrible lately and should be 1-4 in his last 5 fights but got a robbery win against CB. Meanwhile Thales leites has done good in all of the fights I´ve seen and can remeber, 9-2 in UFC with 1 loss to Anderson Silva and a split decision loss to Alessio sakara.
I think they're both not very good so I'm really trying to figure out whether Boetsch should be as big of an underdog as he is.
I've seen some improvement in Leites, and I think he's the better fighter;however, I'd take Boetsch at +220. You'll probably be able to get a better price on Leites during/after round 1.
Korea (South). Jan 14 2015 02:13. Posts 6817
