Just a Poker iq test for

Haven't done one of these in a long time, remember someone posted something similar on a blog, or was it in a thread a while back, pretty fun. (At least if it's 03:00am).

http://www.testyourpoker.com/poker/index.php

Bottom left, after you're done, click there to avoid the spam, then the score comes up top. I know it's kinda silly test, but it's for the lulz (+ I always dreamed about beating longple at something!!!)

+ Show Spoiler +

122 never had so many sets in my life , i wasn't paying attention to their names at first, thats becasue only 122.

kept trying to bluff the pros, but apparently being a pro in this thing means u always have the nuts lol

125

123, kept trying to bluff the pros as well. Didnt notice at first the names either.

145

116 T_T

126

i played brilliant ... how could i only get 122? what clown made this game? lol

119

On March 05 2014 20:15 Mariuslol wrote: (+ I always dreamed about beating longple at something!!!) I got 138

116

136...and $1326 to rub on my titties.

155 lol

I folded a lot against amazing Allen.

120ish I wish I run that good with money.

119 does it mean i suck ?

On March 06 2014 04:10 longple wrote: Show nested quote + On March 05 2014 20:15 Mariuslol wrote: (+ I always dreamed about beating longple at something!!!) I got 138 116

*Feints*

115 but I'm a bit of a maniac.

109
proofs that iam a lowstakes newb :D

did shove a lil too easy with AK against tough tiffanny
got owned twice by that AA :D

and at the 2nd round where everyone limps and you have 2 4 s in the btn i was not sure if they really wanna me raise them all big times now. but obviously you get calls and flop is not good for us :D

are there more of those? pretty awesome shizzle :D

123. I'm playing like <100 irl though

Your PokerIQScore™ is 135
Considering I'm broke, this test suck ass ;-]

140.

Made a few mistakes, such as going all in with QQ against Amazing Allen, or checking to a donkey holding an obvious Top pair, but apparently in this game donkeys doesnt bet with top pairs.

121

122

amazing allen more like amazing cardrack

130, shouldve folded to pro peter!

128 meh, could be worse i guess.

played around with it a bit to try and maximize my money. ended with 2177 but only 128 iq but i had 134 iq when i played it normally the first time. so clearly the software wants you to not win the maximum and is programmed for you to do certain things.

116, stupidly called 5-bet with AKo vs tough tiffany after she 3bet Amazing Allen.

Think it ended on $1500 for me

125

def 4bet bluffed Amazing Allen, flopped a pair, then turned it into a bluff on the turn when flush got there....like a BOSS

On March 06 2014 04:10 longple wrote: Show nested quote + On March 05 2014 20:15 Mariuslol wrote: (+ I always dreamed about beating longple at something!!!) I got 138 116

Wow i'm just as good as longpie

126

I got stacked by the pro. Went broke with all pocket pairs 6max player i was. Fucking fullring nits =)

So I decided to rematch as a station just to see what everyone had. Test is a sham, nobody played anything like their names suggest. Calling Cassie was not a station, Maniac Mark ONLY raised good hands (wtf lol?), Loose Larry limped good hands, Tough Tiffany always had a good hand, etc. Everyone always had TP, a good pocket pair, or the nuts. Nothing tricky about any of them. Only saw 1 bluff, in a limped pot HU Unknown Ulf bet $5 on the river with king high. Pro Peter called off 100BB's pre with 88 for some reason. And Weak Wendy checked back every turn+riv with TPTK/OESFD etc. Tricky Tim going for thin value on the river betting 2nd pair several time. And the one time Wendy raised from EP she had A6s. Bold bill made an inexplicable call for all his chips with KJo on a 78Ar flop.

Score calling every single hand = 98

Im gonna rematch and ignore their names and play my game.

Mark 5b shoved JTs in sb vs me in ep fwiw

lol so I pretended I was playing 2/5 open raising to $15, 3betting to $45, iso'ing limpers to $25+. I finished up $1200 and scored 97. I'll repeat with normal bet-sizing, making a very honest attempt to play real despite what I remember about the hands (which isnt much really)

edit: woot! 117, movin up!

117

not sure why tough players are limp folding

i tried open-shoving every time the action was on me and got this error message after i finished:

"In order for us to analyze your game and give you the best advice, we require that players take the test seriously.
Our analyzer was not able to give you a score, because of the unusual strategy you used.
Work on improving your game and come back and try our test again. If you believe you reached this message in error,
please contact us. Error code: 25"

lame, give me my score gd it

Aaaahhhh!!

Squished dishwasher soap on my frying pan instead of the olive oil =[

I think people who design these game's aren't that good in poker, but I only base that on this!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=DKJa-7S8jIA

xD

I put it on, here and there, it just puts me in a good mood. My favorite part:

"This is great, so you know, feeling confident, doing my thing, and lo and behold, full house, fantastic hand!".

I got too $4762 but Your PokerIQScore™ is 91

lol

preety sure if isildur1 took this test he would get under 100

136 but accidentally cold called AQo vs utg, utg+1 3b ... just played tight full ring style should work.

122

w/e

remember this game from a couple years back at least?

So apparently you're supposed play like a limpy little douche. The only hands I ever raised were JJ+/AQ+, and I never 3bet anything. Never semi-bluff, always just call down any draw.

Score 130

I got 145 pretty much just playing nit ring and leading out whenever you got good equity on the flop. I don't know if some of that play really works that well in every situation though.

--- Nuked ---

Your PokerIQScore™ is 49

i minbet/minraised everytime the option was on me (except when they raised allin then i just called)

148 I haven't played poker in years but the plays mostly seemed obvious given their names

this is way better than playing rush poker


125

128 not bad for not playing in forever... wish people had these names IRL though

On March 16 2014 21:05 vasoline73 wrote: 128 not bad for not playing in forever... wish people had these names IRL though

too bad the score doesnt mean anything

idk 49 sounds about right for me

On March 06 2014 03:56 EvilSky wrote: 119

47, yayuh

117

most fun poker test i've ever taken

On March 09 2014 20:47 bigredhoss wrote: Your PokerIQScore™ is 49 i minbet/minraised everytime the option was on me (except when they raised allin then i just called)

haha

ck/called every hand and got 93

119 with 1500

On March 29 2014 16:18 gawdawaful wrote: 47, yayuh

owned

125 lulz, I realized they had names after the test duh.

with the QQ as soon as i got 3 bet I was 100% certain this was a little trick to see if you can dodge them bullets... shoved anyway cuz fuck nits


These tests are useless for anyone with an idea of how to play poker, It only separates total fish from competente people.

124

133

123 and i am a bad nit to begin with.