1
| | 
                            
                            |  | Sanity   United States. Oct 12 2010 21:08. Posts 1076 |  |  |  | | usually  | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | Maynard!   United States. Oct 12 2010 21:47. Posts 4453 |  |  |  |  |  | | Now I really am a busto. Thanks FTP. | Last edit: 12/10/2010 21:47 | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | SemPeR   Canada. Oct 12 2010 23:21. Posts 2288 |  |  |  | | the problem with balancing is a lot of the time villain's isn't gonna know you're balancing, so you might as well just bank only when your percieved range being narrower  benefits you.
 | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | mrpav.com   Canada. Oct 13 2010 00:03. Posts 3069 |  |  |  | | i timebank / make bets / calls because i just play slow, its my standard way of playing 
 -Tom
 | 
 |  |  | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | Artanis[Xp]   Netherlands. Oct 13 2010 03:34. Posts 4697 |  |  |  | | 
 |  | On  October 12 2010 15:34  Stim_Abuser wrote: i have no problem with balancing your timing on plays.
 
 
 one thing that pisses me off is regs timebank folding to 5bet shoves. i might be wrong on this but when you 4bet arnt you always aware of how you are reacting to a 5bet? you either insta fold because everyone knows you were 4bet bluffing or you snap cuz you 4bet with a value hand that you think is ahead of villians 5bet shoving range.
 
 if you are 4betting value hands then folding that is fucking awful.
 | 
 
 fucking this
 
 Also I can't really timebank anything when I'm playing 16+ 6max tables, so I just act fast on everything.
 | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | Reni   United States. Oct 13 2010 05:37. Posts 3 |  |  |  | | i think like 95% of the time you really don't need to think more than 5-6 sec on a hand. Also if you multitable 8+ those 5-6 sec pauses tend to increase and create semi-random intervals.
 basically just don't make habits like snap-calling/raising with monsters or delaying marginal hands and you should do fine.
 | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| |  |  |  | | 
 |  | On  October 12 2010 22:21  SemPeR wrote: the problem with balancing is a lot of the time villain's isn't gonna know you're balancing, so you might as well just bank only when your percieved range being narrower  benefits you.
 
 | 
 
 
 I don't understand, a lot of the time I timebank or nearly timebank due to thinking before I bet for thin value but apparently timebanking makes my perceived range more narrow..? What are people's general assumptions when they see a slow bet
 | 
 |  | |  | Last edit: 13/10/2010 11:18 | 
 | 
 
 | 
0
| | 
                            
                            |  | dogmeat   Czech Republic. Oct 13 2010 11:23. Posts 6374 |  |  |  | | 
 'cut down tables idiot'|  | On  October 13 2010 10:16  Night2o1 wrote: 
 | Show nested quote + 
  On  October 12 2010 22:21  SemPeR wrote:the problem with balancing is a lot of the time villain's isn't gonna know you're balancing, so you might as well just bank only when your percieved range being narrower  benefits you.
 
 | 
 
 What are people's general assumptions when they see a slow bet
 
 | 
 | 
 |  |  | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | cariadon   Estonia. Oct 13 2010 15:35. Posts 4019 |  |  |  | | i timebank when i stretch my legs or drink or whatever, good luck reading peoples souls,fake timebank thinking when you arent folding anyway is odd
 | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| |  |  |  | | how often do u timebank to stretch your legs during a big hand tho | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | BigRed0000    United States. Oct 13 2010 17:50. Posts 3554 |  |  |  | | meh i time bank fold some times just to make people sweat.  It's the little things you gotta enjoy in poker. | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | Svenman87   United States. Oct 13 2010 21:07. Posts 4636 |  |  |  | | I don't have time to timebank playing 24+ tables | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | Surprise   United States. Oct 13 2010 22:20. Posts 275 |  |  |  | | I thought multitabling past 12 tables was bad?  | 
 |  | | the games you own at, end up owning you |  | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | lachlan   Australia. Oct 13 2010 23:35. Posts 6991 |  |  |  | | 
 |  | On  October 13 2010 21:20  Surprise wrote: I thought multitabling past 12 tables was bad?
 | 
 
 that may or may not be true, depending on several variables
 | 
 |  |  | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | YoMeR   United States. Oct 14 2010 00:59. Posts 12438 |  |  |  | | 
 |  | On  October 13 2010 21:20  Surprise wrote: I thought multitabling past 12 tables was bad?
 | 
 
 
 only if yur bad.
 | 
 |  |  | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | lachlan   Australia. Oct 14 2010 04:17. Posts 6991 |  |  |  | | pretty much what yomer said :D | 
 |  |  | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | whamm!   Albania. Oct 14 2010 08:21. Posts 11625 |  |  |  | | 
 |  | On  October 13 2010 16:50  BigRed0000 wrote: meh i time bank fold some times just to make people sweat.  It's the little things you gotta enjoy in poker.
 | 
 
 | 
 | 
 
 | 
1
| | 
                            
                            |  | CheeseStack   United States. Oct 15 2010 17:23. Posts 7 |  |  |  | | 
 |  | On  October 12 2010 12:32  LemOn[5thF] wrote: I need to force myself to timebank not to make retarded spastic decisions all over the place. I still do though -.-
 | 
 
 
 Haha - same here.
 | 
 | 
 
 | 
|  |