1
 |
Muhweli   Finland. May 07 2010 18:27. Posts 10663 | | |
| | On May 07 2010 16:50 anon wrote:
thats what zerg is all about, being a responder. Playing too agressive is always risky, because one wrong attack and your are done. I kind of like the patch it makes mech stronger |
Mech was pretty strong pre-patch too in TvZ, their buffs + infestor nerf together made it seriously harder for zerg to deal with the mech. Also, hellions are easier to micro now and they pwn the living shit out of everything but roaches. On the bright side, mass infestor still seems like a semi-viable strat, altho the nerf makes it considerably harder to execute early game (and less efficient mid and late due to energy running out).
I still hear some protosses bitching about roaches tho - is that because they're the only unit being able to TOUCH the protoss army late game? Without some kind of core mass, zerg would just be a pile of blood and flesh on the ground burning up. Time to get the head of the ass and try playing zerg to see how strong protoss shit is. Good unit compositions, sentry micro and timing is really friggin' hard for zerg to deal with in occasions. Maybe the only thing protoss loses to is roaches, but without that, who'd be imba? Hint: Protoss wouldn't lose unless there was something to do against it. |
|
| Floofy says: my dick is easily bigger than 90% of guys i checked it on the net | Floofy says: i im also doing movements | |
|
|
1
 |
Perisie   . May 07 2010 18:50. Posts 801 | | |
i dont know, i need to see some recent top replays to figure out what to do now. as a gold player i struggle with droning the exact amount before switching to army, and as a starcraft 2 player i feel there could be 1000 openings that are possible that i dont know about yet. zerg just dont seem to have any offensive play other than speed lings and nydus canal. im fine with having to respond to other races (actually i sick of it as a toss player). zerg used to be the race of map control and strategic advantage (which actually counts for something in a strategy game, hello????) but i feel like we turtle more than any other race with our default fast expand (dont know why we fast expand though, its not like we ever benefit from it) |
|
|
1
 |
Perisie   . May 07 2010 18:56. Posts 801 | | |
| | On May 07 2010 15:54 Perisie wrote:
for zerg (and terran sometimes) you can be a saturated base ahead of your opponent but attacking at the wrong time or wrong position will auto-lose you the game. the majority of my games are lost from stupid attacks against collossos when i'm WILDLY ahead. this is 100% my fault and is comparable to tvp in sc1 except you actually insta lose when you attack rather than being able to withdraw with your goons and replenish frantically |
to be honest i think a 50% speed decrease in terran/protos units would help here. maybe forcefield should be moved to zerg (ensnare) just so when you lose a battle as zerg you dont automagically lose the entire game |
|
|
1
 |
Fujikura   United States. May 07 2010 21:45. Posts 1795 | | |
Btw Perisie I play random on sc2, so your point is kind of null  |
|
| aka SouL)Z(Isadie and SouL)P(Fujikura | |
|
|
1
 |
Svenman87   United States. May 07 2010 21:51. Posts 4636 | | |
I'm having such a hard time with PvP
seems like whatever I do I get rolled over.
I try 2 robo imo build and get rolled by mass zlot+stalker
I try 2 robo imo build and get rolled by void ray rush
I try mass zlot+stalker and get rolled by 2 robo build
I've always been awful at mirror matches but fuck this is killing me. I'm like 4-0 vs Zerg and 5-1 vs Terran but for whatever reason I'm like 2-5 vs Protoss
I don't feel like the players I played were all that great either, just that I'm that bad in PvP
What're the standard builds in PvP? I've just been going 2 robo imo in about 80% of Pvp's |
|
|
5
 |
Nazgul   Netherlands. May 07 2010 22:50. Posts 7080 | | |
definitely not 2 robo immortals lol
try to experiment a bit with zealot sentry builds, stalker blink builds (works vs zeal sentry), robo into colossi those are basic builds once you get a better feel for the matchup I'd start using immortals more |
|
| You almost twin-caracked his AK - JonnyCosmo | |
|
|
1
 |
Jas0n   United States. May 07 2010 23:34. Posts 1866 | | |
Anyone looking for a 2v2 platinum level partner, let me know. My current one doesn't seem too interested in sc2 anymore. |
|
|
1
 |
CCMoz   United Kingdom. May 09 2010 16:19. Posts 925 | | |
Hi guys,
Scored a beta key off a mate last weekend so been playing lots this week, just about getting the hang of it!
Does anyone want to play some games; 1v1 or 2v2? If so whats your IDs? I'm using; ccmoz.ccmoz
|
| |
|
|
1
 |
Fujikura   United States. May 10 2010 02:55. Posts 1795 | | |
| | On May 07 2010 20:51 Svenman87 wrote:
I'm having such a hard time with PvP
seems like whatever I do I get rolled over.
I try 2 robo imo build and get rolled by mass zlot+stalker
I try 2 robo imo build and get rolled by void ray rush
I try mass zlot+stalker and get rolled by 2 robo build
I've always been awful at mirror matches but fuck this is killing me. I'm like 4-0 vs Zerg and 5-1 vs Terran but for whatever reason I'm like 2-5 vs Protoss
I don't feel like the players I played were all that great either, just that I'm that bad in PvP
What're the standard builds in PvP? I've just been going 2 robo imo in about 80% of Pvp's |
Most people go something like 4 gate stalker + blink, or 3 gate robotics zeal/sentry/colossus. I like going zeal/sentry/pheonix, but it's really weak vs stalker builds, but SO FUN TO MICRO. |
|
| aka SouL)Z(Isadie and SouL)P(Fujikura | |
|
|
1
 |
Perisie   . May 10 2010 08:17. Posts 801 | | |
im perisie.perisie on usa , ill play 1v1 if you're not zerg (im zerg) or 2v2 just to fuck around
i saw a new pheonix on goatrope show, it passed by 3 overlords in succession, firing off 1 shot at each whilst speeding past them, it was the funniest thing ive ever seen and laughed for a minute |
|
|
1
 |
whamm!   Albania. May 10 2010 09:06. Posts 11625 | | |
i got sc2 and just cant get myself to play anymore. age finally catching up to me. i hope this doesnt happen with d3 as well. |
|
|
1
|
1
 |
Maynard!   United States. May 10 2010 15:53. Posts 4453 | | |
| | On May 07 2010 20:51 Svenman87 wrote:
I'm having such a hard time with PvP
seems like whatever I do I get rolled over.
I try 2 robo imo build and get rolled by mass zlot+stalker
I try 2 robo imo build and get rolled by void ray rush
I try mass zlot+stalker and get rolled by 2 robo build
I've always been awful at mirror matches but fuck this is killing me. I'm like 4-0 vs Zerg and 5-1 vs Terran but for whatever reason I'm like 2-5 vs Protoss
I don't feel like the players I played were all that great either, just that I'm that bad in PvP
What're the standard builds in PvP? I've just been going 2 robo imo in about 80% of Pvp's |
I dont think this is like BW where you can simply skip zealots and get goons. You need zealots and you need a lot of them early.Zealots are very good. Follow up with sentries and stalkers. Later get some collosus but some immortals early to continue the press. Always press action. If you get tech and lose choke you are going to lose most of the time.
I've been playing a lot of P lately. I've lost a single pvp in 2 weeks. Most of my wins come from overwhelming zealot numbers and superior zealot v zealot micro early. Most players don't understand how powerful the zealot is in PvP yet I think. I've lost more than half of my PvZ though :D
My favorite thing in PvP is when they wall their choke to create a 1 zealot entry. I set up a 3 v 1 outside their wall and let 1 zealot detroy wahtever building is used to wall. I've won many games that way. Its also pretty lulzy. |
|
| Now I really am a busto. Thanks FTP. | Last edit: 10/05/2010 15:55 |
|
|
1
 |
Muhweli   Finland. May 10 2010 21:43. Posts 10663 | | |
2 robo build? Sounds awfully bad. Dunno tho, I'm no PvP expert. |
|
| Floofy says: my dick is easily bigger than 90% of guys i checked it on the net | Floofy says: i im also doing movements | |
|
|
1
 |
Naib   Hungary. May 11 2010 14:57. Posts 968 | | |
| | On May 10 2010 20:43 Muhweli wrote:
2 robo build? Sounds awfully bad. Dunno tho, I'm no PvP expert. |
It's awful indeed  |
|
| My favourite line is Bet/Fold. I bet, you fold. | |
|
|
1
 |
uiCk   Canada. May 11 2010 15:14. Posts 3521 | | |
| | On May 10 2010 08:06 whamm! wrote:
i got sc2 and just cant get myself to play anymore. age finally catching up to me. i hope this doesnt happen with d3 as well. |
au contraire, mindless games become easier to get addicted to. |
|
| I wish one of your guys had children if I could kick them in the fucking head or stomp on their testicles so you can feel my pain because thats the pain I have waking up everyday -- Mike Tyson | |
|
|
1
 |
Mariuslol   Norway. May 11 2010 15:31. Posts 4742 | | |
| | On May 06 2010 08:36 Perisie wrote:
well with a greater understanding of the game you might tend to like it more |
maybe, but felt i understood it fine, 1st spot plat, almost 2k, 70% win or something, so was beating the bad good ppl atleast. And I have played 50.000 games of sc1, so the understanding was fine compared to the general population.
Maybe I got too old, and I do feel a lot of similarities in my thought process as Fayth and anon, although I wasn't as good as they were in sc1, but was sick good nonetheless for 3-4 years |
|
|
1
 |
Mariuslol   Norway. May 11 2010 15:36. Posts 4742 | | |
| | On May 06 2010 15:34 CamilaPunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 06 2010 05:09 Mariuslol wrote:
Just feel that sc is a million times better, feel I gave it a shot, played like 100 games in 3-4 days, and read lots of stuff on tl, thought about it, let it sink in, just, nothing, get the feeling u get after u watched porn n had a wank, kinda "meh" zzz, and it's annoying, wanted to love it, but can't force it lol.
Hrmpfh!! |
your not 12 anymore.. thats where that feeling comes from
the game is amazing though.. very fun
|
Nja, im still Child like in a lot of area's, I love training, I love manga, I feel like a kid on x-mas eve when the new manga's release on thursday, I love poker, just feel the game is a bit boring lol |
|
|
1
 |
Mariuslol   Norway. May 11 2010 15:39. Posts 4742 | | |
hmm, now I feel a bit negative, I do see why the game "is amazing" and all the stuff you can do with it, and the engine. And I respect that people love it, obviously a sick game.
Just not for me
<3
There, now I'm not that negative xD |
|
|
1
 |
Muhweli   Finland. May 11 2010 15:43. Posts 10663 | | |
| | On May 07 2010 17:50 Perisie wrote:
i dont know, i need to see some recent top replays to figure out what to do now. as a gold player i struggle with droning the exact amount before switching to army, and as a starcraft 2 player i feel there could be 1000 openings that are possible that i dont know about yet. zerg just dont seem to have any offensive play other than speed lings and nydus canal. im fine with having to respond to other races (actually i sick of it as a toss player). zerg used to be the race of map control and strategic advantage (which actually counts for something in a strategy game, hello????) but i feel like we turtle more than any other race with our default fast expand (dont know why we fast expand though, its not like we ever benefit from it) |
Mutalisks are pretty offensive. Obviously they're not some super early offensive, banepush is also okay as are some early roach pushes out of one base, but it's the nature of the beast i suppose. There's certainly more than one way to be aggressive early on. |
|
| Floofy says: my dick is easily bigger than 90% of guys i checked it on the net | Floofy says: i im also doing movements | |
|
|
|