25nl lifetime

erm, I'm guessing you have no clue what you're doing o_o

how about moving down??

these hands were all done whilst rolled

i blame the rake

NL25 rake is depressing

48 buyins at 25nl? damn, is 6max microstakes that hard?
i know 25nl FR is easy as hell

no im just a bad player obv

might want to fix some leaks before playing more
i suggest dropping down and finding them

impressive! interested in improving or happy with where you are at? positing your stats might get you some good starting advice...

yea post stats wtfz

stats

stats actually look fairly decent.
could try to raise att to steal, but in general you def need to be winning a lot more on the btn.

--- Nuked ---

fenner msn me next time your on

lets hu

harsh. I'm not in that bad of a spot and I'm definitely trying to avoid it. GL to both of us

I'm pretty awful, started playing again at nl2 (lol), but just because you are rolled for something doesnt mean you HAVE to play it..

On September 11 2008 00:37 BalloonFight wrote: I'm pretty awful, started playing again at nl2 (lol), but just because you are rolled for something doesnt mean you HAVE to play it..

you'll never progress if u think this... would u rather fight it out in hopes of beating the highest stakes in a year's time or be content with winning a few bucks and not moving anywhere?

keep fighting fenner and play full ring

wat

fenner u have alot of determination but ure obv doing something very wrong in ur play. so u just need a really good coach or a cardrunners subscription and u will be just fine. cardrunners recently had this "beat the microstakes" 8 part series. i watched it too and found it very helpful. i suggest doing the same.

and ur stats are fine so i think your problem is post flop play.

one of the most depressing graphs ive seen lol

25nl is a good offset to losses at other stakes this is my lifetime at both limits

On September 11 2008 01:21 lachlan wrote: Show nested quote + On September 11 2008 00:37 BalloonFight wrote: I'm pretty awful, started playing again at nl2 (lol), but just because you are rolled for something doesnt mean you HAVE to play it.. you'll never progress if u think this... would u rather fight it out in hopes of beating the highest stakes in a year's time or be content with winning a few bucks and not moving anywhere? keep fighting fenner and play full ring

Yes but I wouldn't want to lose 48 buy ins just "sticking it out" at the same level. Wouldn't it be better to move down for a bit, cool off + get some $ back then move back up again?

On September 11 2008 19:39 BalloonFight wrote: Show nested quote + On September 11 2008 01:21 lachlan wrote:   On September 11 2008 00:37 BalloonFight wrote: I'm pretty awful, started playing again at nl2 (lol), but just because you are rolled for something doesnt mean you HAVE to play it.. you'll never progress if u think this... would u rather fight it out in hopes of beating the highest stakes in a year's time or be content with winning a few bucks and not moving anywhere? keep fighting fenner and play full ring Yes but I wouldn't want to lose 48 buy ins just "sticking it out" at the same level. Wouldn't it be better to move down for a bit, cool off + get some $ back then move back up again?

That's what i've been doing, ive always been rolled

lol@someone with those stats losing @ partypoker 3 years ago.

the problem with your stats is obvious though, you're playing too loose upfront and too tight in late position.

:O keep going man