Looks or Game? - Page 298

i haven't posted in here for a while, but wow!... the entertainment factor never fails to delivery
muhweli is definitely right. there's no way she could go for 1.5 hours on top with you doing NOTHING. i don't think most girls could go for more than a couple of minutes without needing a break.

and LOL at the constant changing of penis size!? what has it grown to today? floofy with the amount of sex you seem to be getting, your penis must be as shiny and waxed as your acura.

i must admit tho you are quite the catch - monster size hands; tri-lingual (french, broken english and binary); you can drive your partners family anywhere as long as you get 'sucked' for 30 minutes and not to mention your evergrowing willy. i'd hit it

and he drivers his dad's car that is mildly luxurious!

On December 19 2008 20:05 tomson wrote: Floofy's penis doesn't move. It waits.

LOL

On December 19 2008 22:01 Yaffie wrote: tri-lingual (french, broken english and binary)

LOLLLLLLLL

On December 18 2008 03:27 Loco wrote: Floofy, I get your point. It can be frustrating how so many girls are often attracted to the "bad guys" instead of the ones with the good intentions, but that doesn't make it ok for you to disrespect all women because of that. There's a difference between not putting them on a pedestal anymore like you used to do and just straight up disrespecting them. Why should it be an extreme or another? I'm sure you can see how that doesn't make any sense and it's just your frustration blinding you. Or maybe you just can't see it, and people have gotten to you to the point where you're just fine with fooling yourself to cover up the pain that you were inflicted in the past. Either way, you're wrong about all of this and I hope you come to realize it soon enough. Calling girls "retarded animals", what the fuck? You're not only embittered, you're also being an asshole. Muhweli is spot on. How can you blame them? You don't have what it takes to attract them. If those girls were to show interest in you in that state, it would be out of pity. And you certainly don't want that, cause it would hurt you. Trust me there are as many women out there seeking serious relationships as guys who are. It's just so stupid to make such a generalization out of frustration from rejection. This whole time you've been working with internet websites to meet young girls, what the fuck do you expect? People are much more picky and superficial on those sites, Especially young girls. It's not the right place for you to find a good girl and you were too oblivious to it and got hurt and now you think it's fine to hurt people for your own experience. If you wanted sexual experience (which is the ONLY thing that you are getting/have gotten so far) you could've gotten it a long time ago and would've saved yourself time, drama, dignity and probably money as well, considering all the favors you've done to her and her family, the $160 would've been more than worth it and you would have certainly gotten that juice out of your penis. But you didn't listen, you never listen. + Show Spoiler + YOU NEVER FUCKING LISTEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Exactly... the fact that women go after bold, affluent, physically and psychologically mature, and dominant males makes them retarded animals? At least theirs some internal qualities related to their selection criteria, if anything men are the "retarded animals", you shove a pair of large tits and a youthful, symmetrical appearance in their face and they go straight for it. Try not to be frustrated by the fact that girls are generally going to go for "bad guys" and player types, it's generally much harder for these types of people, and I think I'm one of them so I'm speaking purely on personal experience, to settle into satisfying meaningful relationships. Girls separate guys out to long-term and short-term material, in that story you told she almost certainly knew it wasn't going to last, but he's an attractive guy so she hooks up with him right away out of physiological desire instead of you even if you predict 100% what will happen, though it's doubtful she'd admit it. How is what she did despite the obvious and predictable outcome any different or worse from what you're doing with your girl? And 140 is not even close to fat, I feel a little misled, unless she's under 5'2 or something, and even then that's definitely only a little chubby.

On December 17 2008 23:57 Narious wrote: Floofy... no more misogyny... most guys are manipulated as easily as most girls... Misanthropy for the win!

Most guys are more easily manipulated, and by much more superficial factors, then most girls.

On December 18 2008 23:23 Floofy wrote: 5'2 and 143 isnt slim either.... too fat for my taste but shes not some huge whale

It really depends on how and where the weight is distributed, but personally I kinda like the short and a little overweight body type, I think you've been exaggerating just how ugly/retarded/fat she is, now we need pics. ASAP.

On December 18 2008 17:58 OneInTheStink wrote: freud said people of the same attractiveness often more than not attract each other, which means ugly fucks ugly. sry floofy, game recognizes game.

I'm beginning to think she's probably not that bad looking and Floofy might even have somebody a little more attractive than himself.

no floofys better looking but his retardation makes him look ugly to u

Statistically, avg actual coitus lasts for something like 5min. Then again, this was probably conducted by scientists so I'd imagine it's biased downwards by a lot. Just a pointer for the Ugly stupid nerd who seems to be randomly tossing out numbers.

five minutes?

lol wtf? seriously?

i dated a girl who bitched if i didnt last 15 minutes i can only hope shes found someone who is a premature ejaculator by now.

On December 20 2008 03:40 CrownRoyal wrote: five minutes? lol wtf? seriously? i dated a girl who bitched if i didnt last 15 minutes i can only hope shes found someone who is a premature ejaculator by now.

yeah we can only hope

On December 20 2008 03:40 CrownRoyal wrote: five minutes? lol wtf? seriously? i dated a girl who bitched if i didnt last 15 minutes i can only hope shes found someone who is a premature ejaculator by now.

I thought it seemed low too. Have no idea how it has been measured anyway - maybe it's how much you can go in a row without slowing down - who knows. I doubt it means total or anything with rhythming and switching positions, because those add like infinite time to how long you can go (those and position overall). Or maybe it was really done by scientists.

The definition of premature ejaculation is 1 minute (guess those same scientists decided something they could all do).

HAHAHAHAH, WTF, I'm a 6, but..... I'M STILL NOT DOING MOVEMENTS WITH A FAT CHICK

On December 20 2008 03:13 Muhweli wrote: Statistically, avg actual coitus lasts for something like 5min. Then again, this was probably conducted by scientists so I'd imagine it's biased downwards by a lot. Just a pointer for the Ugly stupid nerd who seems to be randomly tossing out numbers.

im sure avg is actually 2-3 minutes continuous movement.

i don't think i last much longer than that without changing position

On December 20 2008 04:27 Muhweli wrote: Show nested quote + On December 20 2008 03:40 CrownRoyal wrote: five minutes? lol wtf? seriously? i dated a girl who bitched if i didnt last 15 minutes i can only hope shes found someone who is a premature ejaculator by now. I thought it seemed low too. Have no idea how it has been measured anyway - maybe it's how much you can go in a row without slowing down - who knows. I doubt it means total or anything with rhythming and switching positions, because those add like infinite time to how long you can go (those and position overall). Or maybe it was really done by scientists. The definition of premature ejaculation is 1 minute (guess those same scientists decided something they could all do).

imo it all depends on how long you want to last.. want to last a while? get drunk :3
that or wear a condom
might as well be having sex with a lubed up plastic bag :'(

On December 20 2008 19:44 Yaffie wrote: Show nested quote + On December 20 2008 03:13 Muhweli wrote: Statistically, avg actual coitus lasts for something like 5min. Then again, this was probably conducted by scientists so I'd imagine it's biased downwards by a lot. Just a pointer for the Ugly stupid nerd who seems to be randomly tossing out numbers. im sure avg is actually 2-3 minutes continuous movement. i don't think i last much longer than that without changing position

Yea you're probably right, I read from a few sources actually and I think 2-3 was predominant there.
One source said 5min and it sounded more realistic, lol. Guess it's just some of us balancing the premature ejaculators then, huh 8D

I don't know how these averages are calculated tho, because the speed of thrusting and characteristics of the cunt&cock obviously contribute a great deal to the overall performance.

But whether it was 2 minutes or 5 or even 10, I kinda finda 1.5h hard to believe 8D

On December 20 2008 21:08 Svenman87 wrote: Show nested quote + On December 20 2008 04:27 Muhweli wrote:   On December 20 2008 03:40 CrownRoyal wrote: five minutes? lol wtf? seriously? i dated a girl who bitched if i didnt last 15 minutes i can only hope shes found someone who is a premature ejaculator by now. I thought it seemed low too. Have no idea how it has been measured anyway - maybe it's how much you can go in a row without slowing down - who knows. I doubt it means total or anything with rhythming and switching positions, because those add like infinite time to how long you can go (those and position overall). Or maybe it was really done by scientists. The definition of premature ejaculation is 1 minute (guess those same scientists decided something they could all do). imo it all depends on how long you want to last.. want to last a while? get drunk :3 that or wear a condom might as well be having sex with a lubed up plastic bag :'(

There are thin condoms too you know. At least thinner than a plastic bag! 8D

I just think it's about sheer will power and technique tho.
Pretty sure it's possible to go for like hours until you get tired if you do it right. Then again, just going many times is obviously more rewarding.

True about condoms, no condoms = gg Yo @ 3 mins, with condoms i can last like 15 >_<

On December 20 2008 23:02 Guillaume wrote: True about condoms, no condoms = gg Yo @ 3 mins, with condoms i can last like 15 >_<

yeah i'm with u there bro

i agree, no condoms is very tough to last long at all, you feel it so much ~_~

Actually Muh we learned in the Human Sexual Behavior class that there aren't any guys who can go as hard/fast as they can and not come after a few minutes. As you said most guys make the experience last longer by doing things like going shallower, slowing down, switching positions, etc.

There are some guys who have what is called "Male Orgasmic Disorder" and those people are exceptions to the rule because they find themselves unable to reach orgasm no matter what the situation pretty much.

soooo Floofy might have a problem ? ;p

since he's not used to doing movements, maybe he didn't go as hard/fast as he could