3bet allin profitable?

first hand of the session profitbale. he is playing 14/8.
his range is probably 22+,aj+, qks, sc. he is probably only calling with kk/aa, and since i have a k, it is less likely he has kk. He might even fold KK.

Submitted by : lostaccount

FullTiltPoker Game #3764283730: Table Gemstone - $0.50/$1 - No Limit Hold'em - 14:09:46 ET - 2007/10/05
Seat 1: ksoo87 ($100)
Seat 2: mafoo ($90.60)
Seat 3: arex1337 ($112.75)
Seat 4: Rostock ($30.20)
Seat 5: tachyonweb ($126), is sitting out
Seat 6: rekamniar ($51.35)
Seat 7: CountdeMonet88 ($103.60)
Seat 8: gemmysgemmys ($99.80)
Seat 9: TheGoeku ($182.95)
Rostock posts the small blind of $0.50
rekamniar posts the big blind of $1
5 seconds left to act
ksoo87 posts $1
The button is in seat #3

Holecards
Dealt to ksoo87
CountdeMonet88 calls $1
gemmysgemmys folds
TheGoeku has 15 seconds left to act
TheGoeku calls $1
ksoo87 checks
mafoo folds
arex1337 has 15 seconds left to act
arex1337 raises to $7
Rostock folds
rekamniar folds
CountdeMonet88 has 15 seconds left to act
CountdeMonet88 folds
TheGoeku folds
ksoo87 raises to $100, and is all in

This is stupid lol, why is all I want to know.

On October 05 2007 14:08 lostaccount wrote: first hand of the session profitbale. he is playing 14/8. his range is probably 22+,aj+, qks, sc. he is probably only calling with kk/aa, and since i have a k, it is less likely he has kk. He might even fold KK.

QUOTE OF THE WEEK
HE WILL FOLD KK XDXDXDXDXDXDXDX
yeah its jujst very profitable u invested nothing and u risk all ur buyin for 7$ xD

WICKED SICK

This can't be true

edit your post now so no one else can see this

its for 12.5$.

i hope this is a joke, or its the worst thread of all time

stop playing poker seriously
you are in danger

Don't post OOT, end of discussion. You'll get a lot less respect too, unless this was some stupid joke to begin with.

fairly standard shove

Are you drunk ?!

On October 05 2007 15:01 Muhweli wrote: Don't post OOT, end of discussion. You'll get a lot less respect too, unless this was some stupid joke to begin with.

don't post OOP, imo

he can missclick fold AA too obv

I shove this all day.

No wtf? Why would you even consider this.

Your hand looks like a bluff.

Your hand IS a bluff.

Do you see why this is bad!?

On October 05 2007 15:53 nutshot wrote: Show nested quote + On October 05 2007 15:01 Muhweli wrote: Don't post OOT, end of discussion. You'll get a lot less respect too, unless this was some stupid joke to begin with. don't post OOP, imo

That seems fairly difficult as both the blinds come after the button.

don't listen to the other donks. This shove is clearly +ev as there are less combos of AK/KK. And you have FE against KK/AA addtionally you have massive overlay.

addtionally if the player is a good player he knows you know that he knows that it looks like a bluff. So you can level his ass and go ahead and shove this shit.

ez shippin.

must've misread his hand as krablar

lostaccount style fucking crazy korea style

[WTF]-[WTF]

drop down in limits if you think this is profitable lol

you even posted BB on middle position when sitting at table ? u pro

On October 06 2007 03:04 MysticJoey wrote: you even posted BB on middle position when sitting at table ? u pro

he might've done it on purpose to have a donk image. what he doesn't understand is that it's totally unnecessary and unprofitable

well i make 11.5$ if he folds, and he will have aa/kk/qq less than 9:1( more like 12:1 he ha qq+),
therefore i make 11.5*9 = 103.5, when he calls im like a 90/10 which means i still make 10$, in the end i will have 13.5$ profit.

just a thought but this is the first time i tried it. LOL

Please come play on Stars....

i think this is brilliant
doing something completely retarded your first hand at the table will give you a monkey image for the rest of the session

On October 06 2007 06:03 lostaccount wrote: well i make 11.5$ if he folds, and he will have aa/kk/qq less than 9:1( more like 12:1 he ha qq+), therefore i make 11.5*9 = 103.5, when he calls im like a 90/10 which means i still make 10$, in the end i will have 13.5$ profit. just a thought but this is the first time i tried it. LOL

Let it be your last.

You don't want to have what you represent.

If you limpraised, that'd be a "bit" stronger. This is just flat out retarded.

I won't do the math, I just assume you're right, but that'd only be the case if you got called only by AA and KK, but truth to the matter is that you will get called by a lot more hands..

On October 06 2007 09:57 Muhweli wrote: Show nested quote + On October 06 2007 06:03 lostaccount wrote: well i make 11.5$ if he folds, and he will have aa/kk/qq less than 9:1( more like 12:1 he ha qq+), therefore i make 11.5*9 = 103.5, when he calls im like a 90/10 which means i still make 10$, in the end i will have 13.5$ profit. just a thought but this is the first time i tried it. LOL Let it be your last. You don't want to have what you represent. If you limpraised, that'd be a "bit" stronger. This is just flat out retarded. I won't do the math, I just assume you're right, but that'd only be the case if you got called only by AA and KK, but truth to the matter is that you will get called by a lot more hands..

no way, regular full ring nits will never call with ak here, qq is very marginal.

On October 06 2007 11:20 lostaccount wrote: Show nested quote + On October 06 2007 09:57 Muhweli wrote:   On October 06 2007 06:03 lostaccount wrote: well i make 11.5$ if he folds, and he will have aa/kk/qq less than 9:1( more like 12:1 he ha qq+), therefore i make 11.5*9 = 103.5, when he calls im like a 90/10 which means i still make 10$, in the end i will have 13.5$ profit. just a thought but this is the first time i tried it. LOL Let it be your last. You don't want to have what you represent. If you limpraised, that'd be a "bit" stronger. This is just flat out retarded. I won't do the math, I just assume you're right, but that'd only be the case if you got called only by AA and KK, but truth to the matter is that you will get called by a lot more hands.. no way, regular full ring nits will never call with ak here, qq is very marginal.

FYI, When people do this against me I generally call like 99+ AJ+ and I'm nearly allways ahead.

On October 06 2007 11:26 Narious wrote: Show nested quote + On October 06 2007 11:20 lostaccount wrote:   On October 06 2007 09:57 Muhweli wrote:   On October 06 2007 06:03 lostaccount wrote: well i make 11.5$ if he folds, and he will have aa/kk/qq less than 9:1( more like 12:1 he ha qq+), therefore i make 11.5*9 = 103.5, when he calls im like a 90/10 which means i still make 10$, in the end i will have 13.5$ profit. just a thought but this is the first time i tried it. LOL Let it be your last. You don't want to have what you represent. If you limpraised, that'd be a "bit" stronger. This is just flat out retarded. I won't do the math, I just assume you're right, but that'd only be the case if you got called only by AA and KK, but truth to the matter is that you will get called by a lot more hands.. no way, regular full ring nits will never call with ak here, qq is very marginal. FYI, When people do this against me I generally call like 99+ AJ+ and I'm nearly allways ahead.

6max i never do this retard play but full ring is different....

On October 06 2007 06:03 lostaccount wrote: well i make 11.5$ if he folds, and he will have aa/kk/qq less than 9:1( more like 12:1 he ha qq+), therefore i make 11.5*9 = 103.5, when he calls im like a 90/10 which means i still make 10$, in the end i will have 13.5$ profit. just a thought but this is the first time i tried it. LOL

I've done this (very rarely) at 50 and 100 NL (but always with KK or AA) and have been called roughly 1/4 of those times. However, I have never been called by worse than QQ (AQ, I think, once, and AK the majority of the times I was called). I've seen people shove all in preflop with any pocket pair at 5 and 10 NL, though, even when they are first to act, full ring. I suppose, if you want action in the future at this particular table, you can do what you did and then show your hand when everyone folds.

u r representing that u caught AA, checked it behind 2 limpers in the first hand of ur session, then shoved it allin when someone raised

people's first instinct is to look for a reason to call

u r laying 9 to 1

seems fine

guy will assume you both have AA and fold figuring your going to catch a flush

very good play, specialy vs a nit, no chance he have AA or KK hes a nit

its obviously fine. ur only making this thread cuz he called with AA and u looked stoopid, but even fish win sometimes

I progressively laughed more and more reading this thread.

On October 05 2007 15:28 TwistedEcho wrote: fairly standard shove

/me gigglez

Yomer wrote: don't listen to the other donks.

/me smirks and starts laughing.

and by the time i got to yug's comment i couldn't control myself

Thread of The Year