graph time

wow that guy must hate you

i still think it's just bad fundamentally and there's no argument for playing this way. if his bluff range is too heavy u want to chk, if his value range is too heavy u want to fold pre. theres no in between. u just got lucky here he had 1 of the very few hands u beat that could potentially call down .. but anybody even reasonable is gonna know u cant be bluffing in this spot.

just my opinion tho.

haha

C1awViper: clicklcilcilcik
C1awViper: ops nuts

you are my hero , post dat sexy graph man

On November 15 2012 16:44 Daut wrote: i still think it's just bad fundamentally and there's no argument for playing this way. if his bluff range is too heavy u want to chk, if his value range is too heavy u want to fold pre. theres no in between. u just got lucky here he had 1 of the very few hands u beat that could potentially call down .. but anybody even reasonable is gonna know u cant be bluffing in this spot. just my opinion tho.

completely agreed

holy shit clawviper gettin pwnd

On November 15 2012 16:44 Daut wrote: i still think it's just bad fundamentally and there's no argument for playing this way. if his bluff range is too heavy u want to chk, if his value range is too heavy u want to fold pre. theres no in between. u just got lucky here he had 1 of the very few hands u beat that could potentially call down .. but anybody even reasonable is gonna know u cant be bluffing in this spot. just my opinion tho.

uhh did you account for eduts cold calling the 3-bet?

On November 15 2012 16:44 Daut wrote: i still think it's just bad fundamentally and there's no argument for playing this way. if his bluff range is too heavy u want to chk, if his value range is too heavy u want to fold pre. theres no in between. u just got lucky here he had 1 of the very few hands u beat that could potentially call down .. but anybody even reasonable is gonna know u cant be bluffing in this spot. just my opinion tho.

isn't it likely he checks 100% of his bluffing range on this flop 3 way, leading at least changes the action that he expected and can cause his brain to misfire. not saying I'd expect this to be best move against a disciplined player tho.

On November 15 2012 17:03 2c0ntent wrote: Show nested quote + On November 15 2012 16:44 Daut wrote: i still think it's just bad fundamentally and there's no argument for playing this way. if his bluff range is too heavy u want to chk, if his value range is too heavy u want to fold pre. theres no in between. u just got lucky here he had 1 of the very few hands u beat that could potentially call down .. but anybody even reasonable is gonna know u cant be bluffing in this spot. just my opinion tho. isn't it likely he checks 100% of his bluffing range on this flop 3 way, leading at least changes the action that he expected and can cause his brain to misfire. not saying I'd expect this to be best move against a disciplined player tho.

On November 15 2012 17:01 Zep wrote: Show nested quote + On November 15 2012 16:44 Daut wrote: i still think it's just bad fundamentally and there's no argument for playing this way. if his bluff range is too heavy u want to chk, if his value range is too heavy u want to fold pre. theres no in between. u just got lucky here he had 1 of the very few hands u beat that could potentially call down .. but anybody even reasonable is gonna know u cant be bluffing in this spot. just my opinion tho. uhh did you account for eduts cold calling the 3-bet?

http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/991881

lol

max trolling

lol troll

its 3-buyins deep and other guy cant fold an overpair... why is the preflop call bad ? I dont get

On November 15 2012 17:56 VanDerMeyde wrote: its 3-buyins deep and other guy cant fold an overpair... why is the preflop call bad ? I dont get

hmm location norway this must be an advanced re-level i guess

c1awviper did suck 1.5 years ago when i took like 12 buyins from him on 1 day at 100NL deep tables and apparently he still sucks.
Must be rich or won a big tourney to play that high.
I think you played all posted hands vs him near perfect.Setmining this player is +++++ev all day and when deep this is doable even in 3+ bet pots.

On November 15 2012 18:39 Mardagg wrote: c1awviper did suck 1.5 years ago when i took like 12 buyins from him on 1 day at 100NL deep tables

Was it a hot and dry day in El Paso?

On November 15 2012 16:44 Daut wrote: i still think it's just bad fundamentally and there's no argument for playing this way. if his bluff range is too heavy u want to chk, if his value range is too heavy u want to fold pre. theres no in between. u just got lucky here he had 1 of the very few hands u beat that could potentially call down .. but anybody even reasonable is gonna know u cant be bluffing in this spot. just my opinion tho.

lolllllll


i was like wait didn't i JUST read this same thing somewhere!

On November 15 2012 16:44 Daut wrote: i still think it's just bad fundamentally and there's no argument for playing this way. if his bluff range is too heavy u want to chk, if his value range is too heavy u want to fold pre. theres no in between. u just got lucky here he had 1 of the very few hands u beat that could potentially call down .. but anybody even reasonable is gonna know u cant be bluffing in this spot. just my opinion tho.

villian called 300bbs with QQ there and its a 3 way pot, calling with 88 preflop is fine.


Longple is clicking buttons but Clawviper is clicking buttons back and even worse.

ban baal

On November 15 2012 16:44 Daut wrote: i still think it's just bad fundamentally and there's no argument for playing this way. if his bluff range is too heavy u want to chk, if his value range is too heavy u want to fold pre. theres no in between. u just got lucky here he had 1 of the very few hands u beat that could potentially call down .. but anybody even reasonable is gonna know u cant be bluffing in this spot. just my opinion tho.

??

why

haha this is great

clawviper is def one of the better regs on 5/10 stars, he gives every1 action HU and hes gotten alot better in the last year, he was kind of spewing this session he was down 18k in my hud on 5/10 and said he was down alot more on 10/20. i guess he has some tiltissues but normally i he is really solid/kind of annoying

chat kind gives the sick tilt away.

I dont use the stat for won/lost is useful?

no stat, just click the hud for the popup in HEM and u can see results for session/all hands

On November 15 2012 16:44 Daut wrote: i still think it's just bad fundamentally and there's no argument for playing this way. if his bluff range is too heavy u want to chk, if his value range is too heavy u want to fold pre. theres no in between. u just got lucky here he had 1 of the very few hands u beat that could potentially call down .. but anybody even reasonable is gonna know u cant be bluffing in this spot. just my opinion tho.

this doesnt even apply in this situation at all