Full Tilt Poker Game #1258149913: Table Stanford (6 max) - $0.10/$0.25 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:13:38 ET - 2006/11/16
Seat 1: York Villain ($25.40)
Seat 2: Sharkerfish ($28)
Seat 3: Rocketman89 ($8.35)
Seat 4: nattyfreshhh ($89.35)
Seat 5: AurzaV ($26.20)
Seat 6: chriswinz ($28.15)
AurzaV posts the small blind of $0.10
chriswinz posts the big blind of $0.25
Rocketman89 posts $0.25
The button is in seat #4
Holecards Dealt to AurzaV
York Villain folds
Sharkerfish calls $0.25
Rocketman89 checks
nattyfreshhh folds
AurzaV calls $0.15
chriswinz raises to $1.25
Sharkerfish calls $1
Rocketman89 folds
AurzaV calls $1
AurzaV bets $5
chriswinz has 15 seconds left to act
chriswinz: had jacks
chriswinz folds
Uncalled bet of $5 returned to AurzaV
AurzaV mucks
AurzaV wins the pot ($6.20)
Summary Total pot $6.50 | Rake $0.30
Board:
Seat 1: York Villain didn't bet (folded)
Seat 2: Sharkerfish folded on the Flop
Seat 3: Rocketman89 folded before the Flop
Seat 4: nattyfreshhh (button) didn't bet (folded)
Seat 5: AurzaV (small blind) collected ($6.20), mucked
Seat 6: chriswinz (big blind) folded on the River
Should I be playing this faster? My plan was to check call turn, or bet river if he checks behind. I didn't wanna go crazy cause I figured I'm only getting action from a fullboat or a bigger ace.
He said after the hand he had jacks, and I believe him.
if you add tons of macro options and units and keep the old obligations like sending scvs to mine, pros will just focus less on micro which sucks imo -Floofy
