|
|
 |
spring break 2011. |
 |
1
 |
El_Tanque United States. Mar 12 2011 15:31. Posts 360 | | |
fml as soon as i got home my parents put me to work cleaning acorns from the backyard.
Definitely a plus yesterday as I won $165 on the one armed sluts on the casinos on the way home. I have a blackjack fund that i put $115 towards (now up to $275), and $50 will go to ftp so i can feel more comfortable playing the micros confidently. I like having atleast 20 BI's at the level i'm playing at, so once i'm up to $100 i'll move to 5nl, shouldn't take too long. I've been playing very well, however i am missing out on all the information i could be getting by using HEM, or pokertracker, which brings me to my next question...
Which software works best/most efficiently? I feel i could be making much more informed decisions if i had some background information on certain players... Any info would be appreciated. Thanks!!
|
|
| 1
 |
joLin United States. Mar 12 2011 16:13. Posts 3818 | | |
i love HEM and most players here seem to prefer it over pokertracker. |
| |
|
| 1
 |
TheMusiC United States. Mar 12 2011 16:23. Posts 39 | | |
there are free trials for both (i think pokertracker's trial runs for a bit longer, but you don't get all the features). i used pokertracker for a while and recently switched to HEM, gotta say i love it. the UI on pokertracker is definitely prettier and in some cases is a lot easier on the eyes to read, but as far as features and functionality goes i think HEM is a bit better which i think is far more important than looking pretty when you're analyzing your game ;p |
|
| |
|
|
 Poker Streams | |
|
