so i'm a 'pro' and....

how are you getting 50% RB? SNE?

you don't look like you have an edge in all honesty, you'd prob be busto without rakeback, do you even watch educational vids at all?

On June 18 2010 08:03 luddite wrote: how are you getting 50% RB? SNE?

most EU sites offers 50%+ in RB

On June 18 2010 08:26 Fayth wrote: you don't look like you have an edge in all honesty, you'd prob be busto without rakeback, do you even watch educational vids at all?

havent watch one for some time, i guess ill start watching again
i have 1ptbb for 300k hands

tho typing 1ptbb ( 2bb, 90bb/100 Stdev, 1mln hands, 1000 trials ) here: http://www.evplusplus.com/poker_tools/variance_simulator/ and looking at worst run is depressing

can you pls ship a link w/ 50% rb sites or deals
and how safe this sites / networks are?

my defenition of bad run is something like +20 buy ins over 100k hands I would consider that a super terrible run (i had one last month, havnt had one in 2 years)
you should never be losing money over such a long stretch of hands esp against the level of competition at 1/2, +you have a TON of tables to choose from. 200nL is a giant player pool

as fayth said - you need to take responsibily for your results, thinking you are running bad and that's gonna magically go away is not a formula for success / changing your results in the near future. Furthermore everyone semi-autopilots, there's a good chance you have leaks in your game you are not aware of you need to find them and address them. I beleive the statistic is 80%+ of people who play poker think they run under average. 1 in 1000 actually do, the rest of us are exactly where we deserve to be. The fact that you reply to fayth post with some varience calculator to convince him + yourself that you run bad means you beleive theres nothing wrong with your current game + again you are not taking responsibilty for your results

well you should read again my post then :O

as you can see on the graph, you can be 1ptbb 'winner' and be losing for million hands. that's a fact.

now read my 1st post and see also that i stated that i have to have a 'very small edge', and i take responsibility for that, belive me i take responsibility for that for last 2 years, it's just i know things i dont apply to my game, cause fuck i dont know, cause id like it to be walk in the park? cause id like to just click the buttons, i dont know
i guess i have bad habbits i let control over my decision making process and it's hard to leave them behind


also one more thing:

"you should never be losing money over such a long stretch of hands"

this clearly states you dont know what you're talking about, use the variance calculator plz and you will be enlightend, -20 BI for 100k hands is the worst run with 3ptbb, yeah hard to belive, is it?

now as i said in the first post, i dont belive to be a hudge winner, nor i make excuses ( well obv i make them while playing to call/raise some shit i shouldnt ) but i see those results and i know who is responsible, i always know who to blame i just dont see the way out lol


"my defenition of bad run is something like +20 buy ins over 100k hands"

obv this made my laugh :D change dictionary with those definitions :D

i'm sorry, i know you have a green star and you are a better player than me, but still when it comes to variance your post above means you know less then me ( or refuse to accept what is in the variance calculator ) maybe it's good for you cause it makes you work harder on your game ( not accepting variance as part of an explanation of your results ) , but i srsly have more problem while playing at the table than with how to come to good conclusions, and it's not about what someone tells me before the game, its about when i sit there and im all alone with my decissions