Cake vs FTP quick statistics

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!

Forum Index > Poker Blogs

terrybunny19240 United States. Feb 11 2009 23:07. Posts 13829

I noticed the games didn't look all that great at cake, and since I've moved there I have always said there are a LOt of regs.

I thought I'd make a quick comparison:

FTP nl100 - 18 tables - AVG player/flop: 30% - AVG pot size: $11.65 - AVG Hands/hour: 103

Cake nl100 - 18 tables - AVG player/flop: 15.4% - AVG pot size: $8.55 - AVG Hands/hour: 104

FTP nl50 - 18 tables - AVG player/flop: 31.27% - AVG pot size: $4.8

Cake nl50 - 19 tables - AVG player/flop: 26% - AVG pot size: $6.5

Any thoughts?

0 votes

Patrocle France. Feb 11 2009 23:10. Posts 623

lag it up.
playing against uber nits is really profitable

An apple a day keeps the doctor away

SirBlotto Germany. Feb 11 2009 23:11. Posts 1270

ftp is still rigged

milkman United States. Feb 11 2009 23:18. Posts 5719

ftp 6max plays very lose and decently aggro

cake plays uber tight cuz u cant track the players.

end o story.

cake is prolly softer all around, but both sites have great games for the stakes..

Its hard to make a easy buck legally, its impossible to make a easy buck morally.

whamm! Albania. Feb 11 2009 23:26. Posts 11625

id stick with cake there. fucking ftp is good for tourneys for me, but im never playing cash there again and fuck up my head

zealit Canada. Feb 11 2009 23:30. Posts 16

I went back to stars from FTP, god table selection is so fucking ez on stars. FTP looks like a nit pool next to stars imo

Last edit: 11/02/2009 23:30

Spitfiree Bulgaria. Feb 11 2009 23:33. Posts 9634

You should be the reg and make the other regs feel like donks.Thats what im trying to accomplish at least :D
Anyway with this stats id choose Cake anyday coz of higher avg pot$ and coz VPIP % stats on many sites is calculated badly ( many sites calculate it over last 10 hands or smtng dunno if its like that in Cake but that sux so hard coz table avg VPIP swings from 60% to 6% every 100hands)

RS_II United States. Feb 12 2009 00:10. Posts 748

consider stars? omg rofl...

SKoT: I got 99 problems and a bitch aint 1

terrybunny19240 United States. Feb 12 2009 03:41. Posts 13829

ah so many different opinions

I really am curious how a 15% player/flop game could possibly be as profitable as a 30% player/flop game..

Any thoughts?

Anyway I wanted to throw in a GRAPH !

nl50 this month

Last edit: 12/02/2009 03:42

Patrocle France. Feb 12 2009 13:13. Posts 623

On February 12 2009 02:41 Night2o1 wrote:
ah so many different opinions

I really am curious how a 15% player/flop game could possibly be as profitable as a 30% player/flop game..

not "as profitable", but *more* profitable
Especially because their fold frequency postflop is too high, and cause they let go the blinds to a steal.
It's not big pot poker as you're accustomed to vs a passive calling-station fish, but laggy small pot poker.

An apple a day keeps the doctor away