My most epic 2 days of 2011

My only weapon against such a beast of a foe was my will power.

yurasov1990 is that good?

I know the feelign ( altho smaller sample)
Nice , back in the good days of party , i was down 3200$ playing 600 nl,
but almost all of it were bad beats.
But i was playing beautifull and always got the money in ahead
So i kept playing and ended up +3600 from -3200 , Awesome~

whats ur vpp count sir?

hnr at the end?

You are a beast sir

about 830000 vpp now.

It was about 4 hours of 25/50 and 50/100 action.. Totalling a 16 hour poker session, in no way was it a hit and run.

well you did sucked out on me twice so you're welcome

wobbly u r such a hero featured blog for you would be great too

wp

do you call river if you're not stuck?

On November 12 2011 13:27 bigredhoss wrote: do you call river if you're not stuck?

I'm more curious as to what would have happened if villain turned over a flush.

On November 12 2011 14:59 edzwoo wrote: Show nested quote + On November 12 2011 13:27 bigredhoss wrote: do you call river if you're not stuck? I'm more curious as to what would have happened if villain turned over a flush.

obv troll is obv

On November 12 2011 14:59 edzwoo wrote: Show nested quote + On November 12 2011 13:27 bigredhoss wrote: do you call river if you're not stuck? I'm more curious as to what would have happened if villain turned over a flush.

+1

I guess something like 4 tables of 50/100 HU vs 0human0 or someone like that till even or busto.

Btw, was everyone stuck or why was this game even running? I mean 50/100 games without a fish dont really run too often...

Seat 1: wobbly_au ($24626.50 in chips)
Seat 2: takechip ($25968 in chips)
Seat 3: doncarignano ($11444 in chips)
Seat 4: 0Human0 ($10025 in chips)
Seat 5: Kanu7 ($14197.85 in chips)
Seat 6: yurasov1990 ($31703.90 in chips)

yurasov, hes not a fish but not a known reg afaik

yea game was def running coz of yura~

me and locoo have good times, you remember few days ago winning 4-5 flips in HU?

Also with how the game was running, I woulda called any K vs yura, i actually prefer any K over 88 and im sure if you guys thought hard enough you'd figure out why.

On November 12 2011 09:34 tomson wrote: Show nested quote + My only weapon against such a beast of a foe was my will power. yurasov1990 is that good?

Was obv talking about about the might Poker Godz

you figure his range is top set/flush so would rather block some kkk?

enlighten us bro

Yea +1 on featured blog. Brag graph blog is great for game

On November 12 2011 17:20 wobbly_au wrote: Also with how the game was running, I woulda called any K vs yura, i actually prefer any K over 88 and im sure if you guys thought hard enough you'd figure out why.

lol wobbly is trollin or brain dead from no sleep. 88 > Kx all day. You beat ton more combo of hands and you still have equity against a flush with 88. There's no way he's checking river with a flush when board pairs as well. Holding Kx instead of 88 turns ur decision into a snapcall to fuckyou1time.jpg call. Kx is dead against 33/88 plus one Kx doesn't reduce the combo of hands villain will bluff with. It actually adds 2pair combo for the villain. We can also neutralize % of yurasov flatting KK pre with yurasov flatting pre with something like K5suited or 53suited to shut the argument of villain holding KK

in before wobbly checks in and claims he has superuser read on yurasov and he never ever raises 33/88 on the turn

Basically with the current dynamic, there was no way he would flat a draw/monster on the flop. So the only time he flats is, Acehighs and 8X 3X or some mid pair.

On the turn when he raises its because he knows the made hand that he flatted is likely to be put into a tough spot on most rivers if he calls coz of my 2nd barrel so he decides to turn it into a bluff.

Thus having 88 reduces the chance of hes made hands turned bluffs so i'd rather have KX

[x] wobbly claims he has superuser read on yurasov

lol jk nice hand

On November 13 2011 04:49 AndrewSong wrote: [x] wobbly claims he has superuser read on yurasov lol jk nice hand

The hand was obv me hitting a set in a 3bet pot and just close eyes call down

I am quite positive that no matter how you want to spin it, you are delusional to how many combos he can turn into bluffs here if you had Kx instead of 88 and it would be ALOT more -ev having Kx and calling down vs his range compared to 88. Stop pretending Kx is better calling down vs his play because it is not.

On November 13 2011 09:05 Highcard wrote: I am quite positive that no matter how you want to spin it, you are delusional to how many combos he can turn into bluffs here if you had Kx instead of 88 and it would be ALOT more -ev having Kx and calling down vs his range compared to 88. Stop pretending Kx is better calling down vs his play because it is not.

very bold statement lol. I think ur delusional and completely clueless as you were not even in the game or have ever played this high vs these types of players. I aint trying to spin anything.

On November 13 2011 09:05 Highcard wrote: I am quite positive that no matter how you want to spin it, you are delusional to how many combos he can turn into bluffs here if you had Kx instead of 88 and it would be ALOT more -ev having Kx and calling down vs his range compared to 88. Stop pretending Kx is better calling down vs his play because it is not.

iamsomadatubro.jpg jesus.

lol highcard have u even played a game with a higher buy-in than a big blind of this game? -_-

On November 12 2011 17:20 wobbly_au wrote: yea game was def running coz of yura~ me and locoo have good times, you remember few days ago winning 4-5 flips in HU? Also with how the game was running, I woulda called any K vs yura, i actually prefer any K over 88 and im sure if you guys thought hard enough you'd figure out why.

damn right i remember, good times

On November 13 2011 21:43 Baalim wrote: lol highcard have u even played a game with a higher buy-in than a big blind of this game? -_-

Yes and I have no care to take either of your words on thinking Kx with a weaker kicker is more desirable than 88, unless you are going to write out a detailed analysis. Because really, I doubt it is there. The amount of Flush combos compared to 8x bluffs and the added equity of having a fullhouse redraw to the times he has a flush, more than outweighs the times he turns weak SD + FD draw into bluffs and barrels off. I don't think this concept is even close from a total range game theory line.

On November 15 2011 12:53 Highcard wrote: Show nested quote + On November 13 2011 21:43 Baalim wrote: lol highcard have u even played a game with a higher buy-in than a big blind of this game? -_- Yes and I have no care to take either of your words on thinking Kx with a weaker kicker is more desirable than 88, unless you are going to write out a detailed analysis. Because really, I doubt it is there. The amount of Flush combos compared to 8x bluffs and the added equity of having a fullhouse redraw to the times he has a flush, more than outweighs the times he turns weak SD + FD draw into bluffs and barrels off. I don't think this concept is even close from a total range game theory line.

total range theory line what??

o did i mention u were wrong?