MMA news thread - Page 60

And i bet you d get on your knees if you saw him irl
type more biased posts
they cant prove anything yet a test is positive considering his past 2 violations thats enough
GL sir you win the rationality award

lol Floofy its legal for me to carry a weapon, however id still get my weapon taken if i try to get in the court with it are you even thinking through what you write ? If he has a medical condition that forces him to use marijuana then he has two options :
A) quit marijuana
B) quit MMA

Tbh im done,
you can keep defending your idol


p.s. yes its the "bitch's " fault its not like there are 3 other people there, sexist pricks no wonder you defend a punk like Diaz

On September 17 2015 22:52 Spitfiree wrote: And i bet you d get on your knees if you saw him irl type more biased posts they cant prove anything yet a test is positive considering his past 2 violations thats enough GL sir you win the rationality award lol Floofy its legal for me to carry a weapon, however id still get my weapon taken if i try to get in the court with it are you even thinking through what you write ? If he has a medical condition that forces him to use marijuana then he has two options : A) quit marijuana B) quit MMA Tbh im done, you can keep defending your idol p.s. yes its the "bitch's " fault its not like there are 3 other people there, sexist pricks no wonder you defend a punk like Diaz

The rules are not that Diaz can't smoke weed. The rules are he can't smoke weed during his fight, mainly for his safety i believe. As ricain explained to you, the accredited labs have said it was negative.

Even assuming that he did smoke weed on fight night, 5 years is ridiculous for weed. Silva got 1 year for steroids which is obviously way worse. At worst Diaz can hurt himself smoking weed. Silva can seriously hurt other fighters taking steroids.

Btw my idols are McGregor and Rockhold... but i do enjoy watching Nick fight.

I dont like Nick Diaz, I think he is a huge idiot on so many levels, but this ruling was clearly absolute bullshit and shows once again how the athletic commissions are a joke and need to be rebuilt from scratch.

Splitfiree seriously you are making a fool of yourself talking so strongly about a subject you are clueless with people who know a lot more than you, gtfo.

On September 18 2015 04:26 Baalim wrote: I dont like Nick Diaz, I think he is a huge idiot on so many levels, but this ruling was clearly absolute bullshit and shows once again how the athletic commissions are a joke and need to be rebuilt from scratch. Splitfiree seriously you are making a fool of yourself talking so strongly about a subject you are clueless with people who know a lot more than you, gtfo.

This part "UFC probably banned him for life just cause they got fed up with his stupidity and were just waiting for a good opportunity to dump his ass " shows how clueless he is.

The first video of Nick pleading the 5th 27 times in a row or whatever is truly amazing. Total lack of both common sense and decency by the commission. It's also completely ludicrous to think you can infer a true/false answer somehow from someone pleading the fifth.

Whatever
In any other decent sport his behaviour would most likely result to a lifetime ban of competition in the sport ( might be just a few years under good circumstances ) . One way or another he got what he deserved. Might not be justified in current scenario, sure as hell is justified overall. Good luck overturning the vote of a state government body over an internet petition that can be signed through bots and its legitimacy is as good as reptile conspiracy theories

Also considering he s banned in Nevada can't he just fight in another state or another country?

Whatever my ass.

just recognize you were talking shit and stop trying to salvage your ego, jeez.

I was, except it wasn't ego evolved, its about justice except it wasn't fair in current case.

On September 18 2015 22:59 NMcNasty wrote: The first video of Nick pleading the 5th 27 times in a row or whatever is truly amazing. Total lack of both common sense and decency by the commission. It's also completely ludicrous to think you can infer a true/false answer somehow from someone pleading the fifth.

This

On September 17 2015 22:52 Spitfiree wrote: And i bet you d get on your knees if you saw him irl type more biased posts they cant prove anything yet a test is positive considering his past 2 violations thats enough GL sir you win the rationality award lol Floofy its legal for me to carry a weapon, however id still get my weapon taken if i try to get in the court with it are you even thinking through what you write ? If he has a medical condition that forces him to use marijuana then he has two options : A) quit marijuana B) quit MMA Tbh im done, you can keep defending your idol p.s. yes its the "bitch's " fault its not like there are 3 other people there, sexist pricks no wonder you defend a punk like Diaz

Everybody point and laugh at this man.

On September 25 2015 01:11 soberstone wrote: Show nested quote + On September 17 2015 22:52 Spitfiree wrote: And i bet you d get on your knees if you saw him irl type more biased posts they cant prove anything yet a test is positive considering his past 2 violations thats enough GL sir you win the rationality award lol Floofy its legal for me to carry a weapon, however id still get my weapon taken if i try to get in the court with it are you even thinking through what you write ? If he has a medical condition that forces him to use marijuana then he has two options : A) quit marijuana B) quit MMA Tbh im done, you can keep defending your idol p.s. yes its the "bitch's " fault its not like there are 3 other people there, sexist pricks no wonder you defend a punk like Diaz Everybody point and laugh at this man.

- Uriah Hall is filling in for an injured Michael Bisping, and will face Robert Whittaker at UFC 193 on November 14, 2015.

- Paige VanZant vs. Joanne Calderwood headlines UFC Fight Pass show on December 10, 2015.

- Travis Browne vs. Matt Mitrione at UFC Fight Night: Dillashaw vs. Cruz on January 17, 2016.

- Tim Boetsch vs. Ed Herman at UFC Fight Night: Dillashaw vs. Cruz on January 17, 2016.

- What investors are being told about UFC revenues.
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2015/10/20...-standard-poors-tell-us-about-the-ufc

- Myles Jury Drops To 145, draws Charles Oliveira on December 19, 2015.

- Sage Northcutt vs. Cody Pfister added to December 10th UFC Fight Pass show.

- Soa Palelei retires from MMA. He said he's gonna focus on helping others in MMA, similar to what he's already doing with Mark Hunt.

- Lorenz Larkin vs. Albert Tumenov at UFC 195.

- Stephen Thompson vs. Neil Magny at UFC 195.

- Paul Felder vs. Daron Cruickshank at UFC Fight Night 81 in Boston.

Larkin vs Tumenov should be a really good fight. Almost feels early to kind of knock one of them off with a loss though instead of having them wipe out a few more solid opponents to be built bigger since both can potentially be top 5 material

On October 23 2015 04:33 iakim322 wrote: Larkin vs Tumenov should be a really good fight. Almost feels early to kind of knock one of them off with a loss though instead of having them wipe out a few more solid opponents to be built bigger since both can potentially be top 5 material

Yeah, I agree.

My money will be on Tumenov. Larkin will end up trying to trade with Tumenov at some point and get cracked. The cool thing is, Tumenov will be able to focus more on striking, and less on TDD when fights a guy like Larkin.

Jon Jones was reinstated today and cleared to fight again....

I like Jeremy Stephens ML at 4.75 x Max Holloway and Cerrone ML 3.0 x Rafael Dos Santos. Thoughts?

I also like Frankie Saenz at 5.5 x Urijah Faber. Thoughts on that one?

On October 30 2015 11:05 Minsk wrote: I also like Frankie Saenz at 5.5 x Urijah Faber. Thoughts on that one?

Explain why you like this line, aside from it paying good money if Saenz were to win.