when to move up? - Page 2

On April 12 2009 18:19 PplusAD wrote: Well i agree with Neilly that this whole shot taking thing is bullshit. like moving up at 20BI and move down at 18BI again ---> u only will play scared cause u want to suceed at new limit so badly and dont want to lose the 2 bi to move down ... grind a comfortable BR that u feel good with -> play the new limit

On April 12 2009 16:04 CrownRoyal wrote: you guys are unreal nits wtf? you're spending way too much time at microstakes playing on 50 buyins anymore than 20 below nl100 is retarded

Fail

in my experience anything close to 2k is perfect for megatabling (e.g. 1750 - 1999). never fails for me

you could do the 20bi rule if you're like a winning 200nl player who's had to cash out and wants to get back asap, otherwise i just don't see the benefit of moving up quickly to limits you are totally unfamiliar with, esp in these games now

yeah i dont want to take any shots at ALL i just want to know about how much is proper i mean at least i would go with the 40-50 buy depends on what i feel comfortable with and when i have a cousion where i dont feel stressed to win just plain ol ABC FTW!!!

everyone who says the number of tables doesn't matter should consider that you're significantly reducing your edge by playing so many tables which means that variance will be higher

On April 12 2009 20:04 failsafe wrote: everyone who says the number of tables doesn't matter should consider that you're significantly reducing your edge by playing so many tables which means that variance will be higher

wouldnt there be less variance when playing more tables and more swings when u play less tables and get fancy play syndrome?

am i right on this or what?