From what I understand none of the rioters were actually students, it was some sorta paramilitarized outside group. Probably paid to be there. The idea is milo's ppl set this up themselves to make Berkeley (a left bastion and stronghold of free speech) and the 'left' (hate even using these words such Bullshit. As though the whole thing isn't much more nuanced) look dumb and hypocritical. Just listen to Milo's little monologue. Isn't even the first time he has done this on a college campus. I've seen the police try to shut down bigger gatherings than this little thing at berkeley. If he really wanted to speak he could have. Noone evacuated him but his own ppl and to say police were actively allowing violent rioting is an absurd lie
Absolutely ridiculous to think Milo paid people to smash his own fans with poles to make liberals look bad come on, this is worse thant he moonlanding conspiracies.
How in the fuck do you know if they were or werent students? they had masks on... and now they are a paramilitiralized group? dude do you even know what that means? that they are trained, have a military structure, use specific military tactics etc, this is idiotic, its just "Antifa" a bunch of violent idiots who hurt their own cause like the violent section of BLM
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online
1
traxamillion United States. Feb 11 2017 01:42. Posts 10468
This is exactly why I think the greatest danger in the election is the potential appointees to the Supreme court. With a Republican senate and Trump as president Scalia has already been replaced by Neil and the court is likely to switch further right due to likely deaths etc. Of older democratic members. This doesn't just last 4 years but potentially generations
Last edit: 11/02/2017 01:52
1
traxamillion United States. Feb 11 2017 01:59. Posts 10468
I do live about 15 mins from Berkeley, go there regularly, and know people personally who were on the streets that night.
I never said anything as fact just some valid suspicions regarding milo. Who do the riots there benefit BTW?
1
traxamillion United States. Feb 11 2017 02:02. Posts 10468
I was loosely using the word paramilitarized. What I meant was basically an organized neo - Nazi group trained in combat and antoginization tactics. So not that far off. There were pretty large groups basically in uniform
1
traxamillion United States. Feb 11 2017 02:04. Posts 10468
It is also proven fact that people were paid to cause violent demonstrations at Trump rallies during the lead up to the election. There is precedent.
1
traxamillion United States. Feb 11 2017 02:09. Posts 10468
Do you know anything about Breitbart news btw Baal?
ironic quote from their own ppl
“If there’s an explosion or a fire somewhere,” says Matthew Boyle, Breitbart’s Washington political editor, “Steve’s probably nearby with some matches.”
(Steve Bannon is being referenced - the former chairman and now Trump strategist)
On February 11 2017 01:09 traxamillion wrote:
Do you know anything about Breitbart news btw Baal?
ironic quote from their own ppl
“If there’s an explosion or a fire somewhere,” says Matthew Boyle, Breitbart’s Washington political editor, “Steve’s probably nearby with some matches.”
(Steve Bannon is being referenced - the former chairman and now Trump strategist)
i am familiar with Breitbart and is not that I doubt such tacts have been or are used, its just simply that Antifa is an actual group that organizes these protets with social media, so its not random people showing up being violent, it was an openly planned thing, it also happened in smaller scale in most of Milos event, and given the liberal media being absolutely thrilled about "punching a Nazi" and most people in campus calling Milo a Nazi I think its literally hundreds of times more likely that they were simply violent people with left ideologies than paid infiltrators.
On February 11 2017 20:40 Mortensen8 wrote:
Should I post it in rofl thread?
I've seen a lot of these but I think they are legit accidents/problems, its not like they are making it look any better by shutting them off mid-sentence, as you just proved this video was viewed by millions, far more damaging than anything he could have said about Hillary.
it does look worse than just letting people talk, but at the same time i can't help but suggest the major medias are incredibly out of touch with reality, which should be obvious.
On September 08 2008 10:07 Baal wrote: my head is a gyroscope, your argument is invalid
On February 12 2017 10:53 nolan wrote:
dunno baal. they've had more than one.
it does look worse than just letting people talk, but at the same time i can't help but suggest the major medias are incredibly out of touch with reality, which should be obvious.
Yeah I've seen more than one, I still think its an accident but I might be wrong obv.
I don't know if I'm falling for that propaganda hole, as John Oliver is surely in the pocket of democrats*, but after that episode, i slowly start believing that Trump isn't just playing a role of some sort to accomplish his goals, but that he is, in fact, a total baffoon that holds justification on any topic in the first place he finds someone mention his own beliefs. I hope I'm falling in the propaganda hole, otherwise the USA is in for quite the ride, its not even funny. The only thing worse than a corrupt politician is a self-confident idiot that has no clue whats going on. The first kind can at least keep control of certain situations
* While he did point out some things Hillary's staff did (email scandal), he never once attacked her in any way or questioned things like her health, he managed to do a report on the other president candidates and passive-aggressively attacked them too. He was basically protecting Hillary in a very subtle way.
