Hey White People! - Page 5

Dogmeat you scare me.... I thought only republicans talk like this....

the fck did i do?

update on the thief guy which i forgot to mention. he still looks like he's capable of doing shit but from what i've heard, that three day prison stint got engraved into his brain like a mofo. Once i heard it i felt i did the lord's work there lol

i couldve just dropped it and have me return what he stole which he still possessed, but i really felt since he was a young adult, he needed to see whats in store for him if he keeps at this thug bs life hes trying to emulate.

whamm confirmed hardest motherfucker on LP

On September 14 2014 16:04 Spitfiree wrote: Actually this is exactly why Japan's overall state of mentality is decades ahead of its time. Those are values they grow up with. Thats their "propaganda" as the values are forced in basically everything from newspappers to animes and shit. Its why they are 10000 times more efficient in anything than other nations. Its also why it took them about 30s to find volunteers( all of which were old) to go and suicide to save the new generation

so ahead of its time they basically lost interest in sex? fuckin betas

On September 14 2014 13:19 dogmeat wrote: he doesnt mean welfare system, he means unconditional basic income, stupid idea some leftist retards who doesnt even understand the very basic economic principles are promoting

Yeah. let's go ahead and keep McJobs instead of automating the cashiers and cooks away so people can work shit jobs. do you even realize how much those types of job account for the total workforce of america?

more like dogshit to me.

On September 14 2014 12:01 Gnarly wrote: im not saying for the federal government to personally do it, but the corporations.

so you want corporations to give money to random people... to generate demand?


lol go back to economics 101 ... nah nevermind go back to common sense 101

On September 14 2014 16:04 suited_mess wrote: but they all commited a crime, and could not keep up with the laws and rules arent they? so what you are winning about? hahaha omg, lots of lols, from a guy who is living next door to a lunatic, if you are so righteous in Korea why dont you help your own brothers in northern part tell me? 10% in jails are black? hahaha where you have your info from :D 50s and 60 s? hahaha, what i think is if you do not obey the fkin law, you are getting what You deserved. Guy on the ground wasnt kept there for nothing right? So the guy killed by DEA wasnt junkie and the dealer, and had nothing to do with it? DEA top narcotic police force invaded a family house, of a guy who had fkin dog, backyard and tree on it? you are lunatic. Same as Your neighbour mate

okay i will schadenfreude all the way to the bank when poland makes trolling illegal and you get your hands amputated

On September 15 2014 02:12 Baalim wrote: Show nested quote + On September 14 2014 12:01 Gnarly wrote: im not saying for the federal government to personally do it, but the corporations. so you want corporations to give money to random people... to generate demand? lol go back to economics 101 ... nah nevermind go back to common sense 101

Its how corporations gain control over people, they give out money in the form of loans, obv not what you meant, but still....

Surprised you bother to read Gnarly's posts though

On September 15 2014 04:33 Spitfiree wrote: Show nested quote + On September 15 2014 02:12 Baalim wrote:   On September 14 2014 12:01 Gnarly wrote: im not saying for the federal government to personally do it, but the corporations. so you want corporations to give money to random people... to generate demand? lol go back to economics 101 ... nah nevermind go back to common sense 101 Its how corporations gain control over people, they give out money in the form of loans, obv not what you meant, but still.... Surprised you bother to read Gnarly's posts though

loans =/= giving money away, not remotely close

On September 15 2014 05:14 Baalim wrote: Show nested quote + On September 15 2014 04:33 Spitfiree wrote:   On September 15 2014 02:12 Baalim wrote:   On September 14 2014 12:01 Gnarly wrote: im not saying for the federal government to personally do it, but the corporations. so you want corporations to give money to random people... to generate demand? lol go back to economics 101 ... nah nevermind go back to common sense 101 Its how corporations gain control over people, they give out money in the form of loans, obv not what you meant, but still.... Surprised you bother to read Gnarly's posts though loans != giving money away, not remotely close

fyp

On September 15 2014 02:12 Baalim wrote: Show nested quote + On September 14 2014 12:01 Gnarly wrote: im not saying for the federal government to personally do it, but the corporations. so you want corporations to give money to random people... to generate demand? lol go back to economics 101 ... nah nevermind go back to common sense 101

I want corps to give money to their customers in order to sustain demand. But I guess it's common sense not to ensure that once you automate your workers away, not to make sure they still work for you through other means. (consumerism) Do you know about a fourth of all jobs in the States are jobs like McD's? Where do you think all these people will work at once McD replaces all cashiers with kiosks, and all cooks with conveyer belts? Then you won't need as many managers, either, and probably just the store manager and an equipment manager. Who do you think is going to be buying up McD's without a job?

OH FUCKING WAIT, IT'S ALREADY HAPPENING. PEOPLE ARE ALREADY BUYING MC'DS WITHOUT A JOB!!!! IT'S CALLED WELFARE!!!!

Except currently welfare is established through taxing working people's income and taxing people's consumerism. Once the people are no longer able to provide the welfare, guess who's going to have to to in order to keep things the way they are? Those whom benefit the most by it.

>common sense
>expecting McJobs to stick around forever, even in the next five years

give money to their customers -> sustain demand -> more $$$$ to be given to customers
????
profit


llol

gnarlie is so goddamn stoopid

>don't give customers money
>wonder why there are no customers

When no one has a job, no one will be a customer. Oh, wait, McJobs are eternal...

i'm not an economist but i believe companies give money to employees, although i'd like to learn more about your planet also gnarly

IM TALKING ABOUT THE INCREASED AUTOMATION WE ARE SEEING IN THE WORKFORCE LOL LIKE OPEN YOUR EYES AND LOOK AT THE COMPUTER SCREEN DON'T TURN 360 DEGREES AND WALK AWAY

LITERALLY ON THIS PAGE LOL

On September 15 2014 14:07 Gnarly wrote: DON'T TURN 360 DEGREES AND WALK AWAY

such a troll :D

On September 15 2014 14:07 Gnarly wrote: IM TALKING ABOUT THE INCREASED AUTOMATION WE ARE SEEING IN THE WORKFORCE LOL LIKE OPEN YOUR EYES AND LOOK AT THE COMPUTER SCREEN DON'T TURN 360 DEGREES AND WALK AWAY LITERALLY ON THIS PAGE LOL

360 degrees? not sure if trolling or just increasingly stupid with each post.


Automatization fear has existed since the beggining of the industrialization of production, oh noes... cars wont be welded by hand, oh the humanity!

What happens is that it simply shifts jobs from mindless grunt work to more advanced work, so instead of welding car doors now robot manufacturer needs people working on their line and more engeneers etc.

So college graduates can stop bitching about having no jobs, because now there will be new positions to build the Mc Donalds auto-servers or whatever, its the natural evolution of society and how jobs are created, jobs should exist because a service is required by society, not as a charity after you do 8 hours of useless work.

You do realize that service jobs are becoming increasingly larger and larger, and is already the largest job type for Americans? Robot manufacturers use robots to build their robots... This is the entire point of automation. We are automating the people who watch over the plants, we are automating scientists, even. We are automating every single thing.

>positions to build the auto-servers

But robots already do that. And we are looking to automate the maintenance part of vending machines, entirely. No one is saying that jobs should stick around because of "charity." Jobs should exist if they are the most effective way to get something done. If automation is more effective, then that should take over jobs.