Baalim   Mexico. Jan 15 2012 01:31. Posts 34305
Internet is too shitty to watch vids but will watch later, what is ridiculous is trying to come to conclusions to things we dont understand, as i said unless you perfectly understand the math behind electron movment and space positioning its beyond retarded to try to come up with conclusions about those experiments.
I remember that movie i keep mentioning "what the "#"#%$ we know", at some point they mention that a particle can be at two places at the same time, ofcourse this is the results of some math and experimentation, but these idiots come to some ridiculous conclusion, oh since a fucking neutrino can be at 2 places at the same time... then astral projection is possible LOL this is what D_Smart is doing, and is absurd.
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online
0
D_smart_S   Bulgaria. Jan 15 2012 03:47. Posts 688
Seems like I overestimated your intelligence, Balls.
To Funktion: you seriously think that I am going to buy a usb cable, buy new batteries for my camera, take a pic of books download them on PC and upload them here to satisfy YOUR HIGHNESS? Are you high?
To Baal: I thought the conclusions are pretty straight forward. I can't recall that movie you talk about. But a pretty average person should be able to draw some conclusions based on the double slit experiment. You tell me if something of what I tell is wrong based on the experiment and argument yourself. So - the experiment shows that electrons exist at infinite places simultaneously ( a wave of possibilities). However, through observation you lock into only one position of those electrons. In other words - everything that there is is an infinite number of parallel realities and the mere observation of us, humans, locks us into observing only one of those infinite parallel realities. It is our brain that is the filter for our minds. Every sentient being in our reality has the same kind of brain because it has to lock us into the same frequency, the same reality. Go and search for Einstein's Parallel Universe Theory.
If we didn't have the same type of brain locking us into the same reality we would have difficulty communicating with each other. Schizophrenics, for example, (most if not all) can see into some of those realities and that's what makes them mad. Their brain filters this reality in a different way. Everything exists simultaneously at the same place. Ask Einstein lol .
Here is a story of a neuroscientist who had a stroke in her left hemisphere and the decoding of reality was fucked up. She could see pixels instead of letters and so on.
Zep: When I said I feel obligated to troll, it was a figure of speech
Last edit: 15/01/2012 04:29
1
Silver_nz   New Zealand. Jan 15 2012 04:19. Posts 5647
On January 14 2012 03:42 HaiVan wrote:
Haha. Perfectly sums up every post by d_smart, loco, and zulu. nothing can be done here. better to pass by.
4
Baalim   Mexico. Jan 15 2012 04:47. Posts 34305
On January 15 2012 02:47 D_smart_S wrote:
Seems like I overestimated your intelligence, Balls.
To Funktion: you seriously think that I am going to buy a usb cable, buy new batteries for my camera, take a pic of books download them on PC and upload them here to satisfy YOUR HIGHNESS? Are you high?
To Baal: I thought the conclusions are pretty straight forward. I can't recall that movie you talk about. But a pretty average person should be able to draw some conclusions based on the double slit experiment. You tell me if something of what I tell is wrong based on the experiment and argument yourself. So - the experiment shows that electrons exist at infinite places simultaneously ( a wave of possibilities). However, through observation you lock into only one position of those electrons. In other words - everything that there is is an infinite number of parallel realities and the mere observation of us, humans, locks us into observing only one of those infinite parallel realities. It is our brain that is the filter for our minds. Every sentient being in our reality has the same kind of brain because it has to lock us into the same frequency, the same reality. Go and search for Einstein's Parallel Universe Theory.
If we didn't have the same type of brain locking us into the same reality we would have difficulty communicating with each other. Schizophrenics, for example, (most if not all) can see into some of those realities and that's what makes them mad. Their brain filters this reality in a different way. Everything exists simultaneously at the same place. Ask Einstein lol .
Here is a story of a neuroscientist who had a stroke in her left hemisphere and the decoding of reality was fucked up. She could see pixels instead of letters and so on.
No thats not the logical assumption you can make about the double slit experiment, for the third time (and like 6th time counting other posters) you dont understand Quantum physics, you probably dont even understand basic physics, you dont know anything about the behavior of electrons, no fucking reputable scientists has EVER said that the double slit experiment leads to the conclusion of your absolutely skewed perception of a multiverse.
Schizophrenics now can see other dimensions? lololol that has to be the most retarded theory ive heard in a while, i happen to know a schizophrenic and i can assure you that he doesnt see any other dimension, he is just plain mentally ill, he thinks the army is after him and he gave me his magical guitar strings (just some random brand new guitar strings).
Actually ive seen that video before, i enjoy watching TED videos and that video in no way supports your absurd hypotesis, the part of the brain that holds the ego got damaged so she saw the world from a point of view where she could barely recognize herself, observing things when your brain is workin in a different way can be very enlightenin in many ways, thats why im such a strong advocate for autoexploration through strong alucinogens, funny instead of reaching the logical and interesting conclusion in that vid of how we usually wrongfuly see ourselves too much as individuals you come up with some absurd irrational ideas.
So to clarify this, you dont "lock on" electroncs on your observation thus creating reality, there is absolutely no basis to believe such thing, especially not the double slit experiment which basically just explains that the electrons behave like waves and particles dependin if a probably interfering measuring device is present.
Funktion   Australia. Jan 15 2012 06:18. Posts 1638
On January 15 2012 02:47 D_smart_S wrote:
To Funktion: you seriously think that I am going to buy a usb cable, buy new batteries for my camera, take a pic of books download them on PC and upload them here to satisfy YOUR HIGHNESS? Are you high?
A chance to silence the haters and you don't take it. Hmm I think a wise and learned scholar once posted something like "think about it carefully and try to deduct as much conclusions as possible. Try to put yourself in the shoes of the retard who hasn't posted and think - what does it mean? What scientific conclusion about the nature of this retard can I make through this experiment."
I'm only kidding I know that your books are in an alternate reality and that in that reality you posted a picture. I blame myself for not having the required schizophrenia to be able to see that picture and realise what a true intellectual giant you really are.
Funny how you can't take a simple picture (no webcam, camera phone or working digital camera in this day and age!?!) but you were fully prepared to list a bibliography of books with set reading. Makes total sense.
0
D_smart_S   Bulgaria. Jan 15 2012 06:26. Posts 688
On January 15 2012 03:47 Baalim wrote:
No thats not the logical assumption you can make about the double slit experiment, for the third time (and like 6th time counting other posters) you dont understand Quantum physics, you probably dont even understand basic physics, you dont know anything about the behavior of electrons, no fucking reputable scientists has EVER said that the double slit experiment leads to the conclusion of your absolutely skewed perception of a multiverse.
LoL yeah. Except for Einstein and almost all quantum physicists including Max Planck. It's just that you don't know. But when you think that you know everything and you know so little the result is that you start arguing documented facts. Learn about Einstein's work and his theories and beliefs on parallel universes. Here is a good start for you:
Haha. Perfectly sums up every post by d_smart, loco, and zulu. nothing can be done here. better to pass by.
What? Who the hell are you to contemptuously "pass by" and give me some sign of disapproval and telling people I am beyond engaging with? You didn't even address me once in this thread. Arrogant, smug prick. You're out of your mind if you think intelligent people here will applaud this type of behavior.
fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount
Last edit: 15/01/2012 09:13
1
lebowski   Greece. Jan 15 2012 09:48. Posts 9205
On January 14 2012 07:48 tutz wrote:
lol havent seen this thread until now, and when I open WOAHHH 6 pages of huge posts discussing religion and shit
how do you guys waste so much time discussing religion here? seriously, what a waste of time
this is an even funnier comment coming from you =)
I didnt mean to be funny, are you trying to offend me?
did I offend you in any way? are you implying that somehow I like to join pointless discussions?
am I trying to offend you? not too much, but yes
You are a person who joined a philosophical/religious debate, had nothing to contribute and called the whole discussion a waste of time.
So more or less what you were saying is that worrying about who we are, wtf we are going , what the purpose of our lives is and what should we do with them until the shit hits the fan is a waste of time.
Now that seems to me semi-funny as it is, but coming from you, a person who's been accused a bit (not from me, I semi-enjoyed the whole prank thing) for "pointless" threads/blogposts, this gets even better. =)
first of all I didnt join the discussion. second, stop putting words in my mouth. third, if trying to offend me makes you feel somehow better go ahead suit yourself. spend your time as you please and I will do the same.
meh I didn't really want to offend you tbh, it's more like I tried to explain why I think such debates are more serious than you think. Theses are discussion subjects that at one point will give you a nasty (midlife) crisis if you never take them seriously. Or when someone really close dies.
new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man...
Last edit: 15/01/2012 13:12
1
whamm!   Albania. Jan 15 2012 10:34. Posts 11625
night vs circa
loco vs silver
lebowski vs tutz
baal vs loco
zulu vs all
dsmart vs all
funktion vs baal
LP getting busy
1
terrybunny19240   United States. Jan 15 2012 10:43. Posts 13829
RUUUUUUUMBLEEEEEE
we need a flowchart of the current arguments just to keep up!
Last edit: 15/01/2012 10:45
1
Funktion   Australia. Jan 15 2012 12:11. Posts 1638
On January 15 2012 09:34 whamm! wrote:
night vs circa
loco vs silver
lebowski vs tutz
baal vs loco
zulu vs all
dsmart vs all
funktion vs baal
Looks more like whamm's wishlist than what has gone on in this thread.
The 'versus' mentality is funny. As if there was more to gain in watching a debate where two egos clash and it's about making the other look as stupid as possible rather than an honest intellectual discussion encouraging the flow of ideas. Not that I'm expecting the latter on here.
fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount
4
Baalim   Mexico. Jan 15 2012 14:39. Posts 34305
On January 15 2012 03:47 Baalim wrote:
No thats not the logical assumption you can make about the double slit experiment, for the third time (and like 6th time counting other posters) you dont understand Quantum physics, you probably dont even understand basic physics, you dont know anything about the behavior of electrons, no fucking reputable scientists has EVER said that the double slit experiment leads to the conclusion of your absolutely skewed perception of a multiverse.
LoL yeah. Except for Einstein and almost all quantum physicists including Max Planck. It's just that you don't know. But when you think that you know everything and you know so little the result is that you start arguing documented facts. Learn about Einstein's work and his theories and beliefs on parallel universes. Here is a good start for you:
Maybe you are going to answer that Einstein and Max Planck weren't reputable enough? Not as much as Dr Baalim, right?
sight, ill read when i get later home at night, but its just an obvios misinterpretation of what they mean again, you theorizing on shit you dont understand.
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online
1
SakiSaki   Sweden. Jan 15 2012 14:57. Posts 9687
edit: oops, think I misunderstood the post. Not sure what you mean saki, I'm guessing that you're saying that, being on LP, I shouldn't be taking any discussions as seriously as I do, or something like that?
I can't turn into 'durr-hurr' playful-mode on these topics, since I'm always studying them seriously. But like I said I'm not expecting people to do the same. It doesn't make me rage like zulu_nation lolz.
fuck I should just sell some of my Pokemon cards, if no one stakes that is what I will have to do - lostaccount
Last edit: 15/01/2012 15:56
1
Zorglub   Denmark. Jan 15 2012 15:53. Posts 2870
On January 15 2012 03:47 Baalim wrote:
No thats not the logical assumption you can make about the double slit experiment, for the third time (and like 6th time counting other posters) you dont understand Quantum physics, you probably dont even understand basic physics, you dont know anything about the behavior of electrons, no fucking reputable scientists has EVER said that the double slit experiment leads to the conclusion of your absolutely skewed perception of a multiverse.
LoL yeah. Except for Einstein and almost all quantum physicists including Max Planck. It's just that you don't know. But when you think that you know everything and you know so little the result is that you start arguing documented facts. Learn about Einstein's work and his theories and beliefs on parallel universes. Here is a good start for you:
Maybe you are going to answer that Einstein and Max Planck weren't reputable enough? Not as much as Dr Baalim, right?
sight, ill read when i get later home at night, but its just an obvios misinterpretation of what they mean again, you theorizing on shit you dont understand.
Even if he was theorizing on shit he didn't understand, it is still a whole lot better than claiming to understand shit you haven't theorized about. Alternate eyes, minds and perceptions are far more productive than anyone claiming other people are wrong, without any significant justification.
I started out with nothing and I still got most of it left