I almost have odds to call vs 77 and 44 =.,= But 10/2 man.... so insane nit.

He probably had AJQx and spades .

Wow. I will never understand

its Bvb, i wouldnt correlate preflop stats with absolute hand strength on this turn raise... idk

noooooooooooooo way, I don't play PLO but noooooooo way

Hm maybe I'm crazy, but this is the only hand out 100 where he's done anything more aggressive than calling or check folding :/

lol...crazy hand, what if u got nuts FD change the way u played it?

I'm not entirely sure it should, but in the heat of the moment maybe it would? I mean, I honestly wouldn't expect this guy to raise AQJX with spades >_< But maybe I'm making too many inferences from a 100 hand sample.

this is bad

i cant even fathom how this can be good. AT ALL.. like no way..

even if you run the numbers on the tighest rannge you will still have enuf outs..

top2 flushdraw calling 33bb for potentially 240bb pot

as is... its 32 to win a 97$ pot... you need 33% for direct odds... your ev here is prob like 25% even if you make the tiniest amount on the river you're good..

plus, folding is not good yo.. your stats cant be much better than this guys... how do you get paid off?

I wouldn't fold here myself. It's bvb and he may not even call with 44 and stop playing zoom I know it's addictive but too many nits.

On December 28 2012 23:54 wobbly_au wrote: as is... its 32 to win a 97$ pot... you need 33% for direct odds... your ev here is prob like 25% even if you make the tiniest amount on the river you're good.. plus, folding is not good yo.. your stats cant be much better than this guys... how do you get paid off?

I obviously dont make these type of folds vs anyone normal, when was the last time you even saw someone play 10/2......? I can be made to believe this is a bad fold, certainly, but the second part of your statement is ridiculous.

i dont think his stats should be factored in to your decision between calling or folding... it only matters between calling and shoving..

second part wasnt really meant to be taken too seirously, just kind of a general thing.

cant be a fold
even with those reads :/

170bb++ deep id agree with that hand bein a tough spot against such a player

how do u even know these stats during a zoom hand hehe

Wow... for me its a snap ship.
Even with his stats.

EDIT: WTF with my account its showing 0 posts from yesterday like new user and im here like 2 years and make a lot of comments ?

KT is more likely than 77 or 44, 10/2 nits don't have many 44's or 77s, and he would probably have raised flop with them.

On December 29 2012 05:06 GosuRage wrote: Wow... for me its a snap ship. Even with his stats.

Welcome to LP, next time let the more experienced players that have been around for at least a couple years to comment on green star hands!

Yea I'm snapping that, I don't give a shit how much of a nit he is. People do random crap sometimes, even nits.

100 hands isn't really a valid sample anyway. No-one plays 10/2. He'll probably round up to around 17/10 at the worst.

That said I'd never fold. Even if he has KK a decent amount of the time it still feels too dirty to fold.

On December 29 2012 06:21 LemOn[5thF] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2012 05:06 GosuRage wrote: Wow... for me its a snap ship. Even with his stats. Welcome to LP, next time let the more experienced players that have been around for at least a couple years to comment on green star hands!

Ehh, I wasn't aware of this rule o.o|

EDIT: Ah you're joking

I don't fold even if he shows me his card before I take a decision :D

probably KKxx :D

77JAss sounds right -_-

Am I the only person that even considers that he has a rundown = wrap? Even a 10/2 wouldn't fold a beautiful, potentially suited, rundown in position vs a SB raise...