PokerStars Game #73536846797: Holdem No Limit ($0.05/$0.10 USD) - 2012/01/08 23:08:30 ET
Table Rosina X 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: eVLAV225 ($9.85 in chips)
Seat 2: xicotaSLB ($10 in chips)
Seat 3: sedjkpro ($22.34 in chips)
Seat 4: katscha1991 ($25.89 in chips)
Seat 5: JimmyClips ($10.41 in chips)
Seat 6: RafaelGrego ($2.54 in chips)
xicotaSLB: posts small blind $0.05
sedjkpro: posts big blind $0.10
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to xicotaSLB 
katscha1991: folds
JimmyClips: folds
RafaelGrego: raises $0.10 to $0.20
eVLAV225: calls $0.20
xicotaSLB: calls $0.15
sedjkpro: raises $0.10 to $0.30
RafaelGrego: calls $0.10
eVLAV225: calls $0.10
xicotaSLB: calls $0.10
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $1.20)
xicotaSLB: checks
sedjkpro: checks
RafaelGrego: bets $0.20
eVLAV225: calls $0.20
xicotaSLB: raises $1.30 to $1.50
sedjkpro: folds
RafaelGrego: raises $0.74 to $2.24 and is all-in
eVLAV225: raises $3.31 to $5.55
xicotaSLB: folds
Uncalled bet ($3.31) returned to eVLAV225
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $5.14)
River (Pot : $5.14)
Showdown
RafaelGrego: shows 
(high card Ace)
eVLAV225: shows 
(three of a kind, Eights)
eVLAV225 collected $6.83 from pot
Summary
Total pot $7.18 | Rake $0.35
Board
Seat 1: eVLAV225 (button) showed and won ($6.83) with three of a kind, Eights
Seat 2: xicotaSLB (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 3: sedjkpro (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 4: katscha1991 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: JimmyClips folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: RafaelGrego showed and lost with high card Ace
1
 |
dUUd_ Estonia. Jan 11 2012 13:30. Posts 1840 | | |
folding sets in nl10. poker is dead |
|
| redsnuff: bets all in with bad preflop hand and tell me to learn poker redsnuff: senceless | |
|
|
1
| |
| | On January 11 2012 12:30 dUUd_ wrote:
folding sets in nl10. poker is dead |
its actually a good fold given the action and reasonable |
|
|
1
 |
Carthac United States. Jan 11 2012 13:52. Posts 1343 | | |
| | On January 11 2012 12:39 sunnysky7 wrote:
its actually a good fold given the action and reasonable
|
I see reasoning, but not near good enough for the price we have to call, and especially with NL10 opponents. Rarely will anyone show up with QQ here, so we are only afraid of 88. Lotta NL10 villains will overplay a strong queen this way, and given how much we have invested already, I think its snap call all day |
|
| | Last edit: 11/01/2012 13:54 |
|
|
1
|
xicotaSLB Portugal. Jan 11 2012 14:02. Posts 1128 | | |
from my personal experience the call/3bet line is allways the nuts, calling = shove here so its like he shoved, do you think he shoves AQ here -.-? |
|
|
1
 |
tuna333 Czech Republic. Jan 11 2012 14:12. Posts 128 | | | |
|
| | Last edit: 11/01/2012 14:22 |
|
|
1
 |
bigredhoss Cook Islands. Jan 11 2012 14:17. Posts 8648 | | |
| | On January 11 2012 12:52 Carthac wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2012 12:39 sunnysky7 wrote:
| | On January 11 2012 12:30 dUUd_ wrote:
folding sets in nl10. poker is dead |
its actually a good fold given the action and reasonable
|
I see reasoning, but not near good enough for the price we have to call, and especially with NL10 opponents. Rarely will anyone show up with QQ here, so we are only afraid of 88. Lotta NL10 villains will overplay a strong queen this way, and given how much we have invested already, I think its snap call all day |
+1, def foldable vs certain players but you need more reason than the line/situation itself. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
strydah United States. Jan 11 2012 14:41. Posts 230 | | | |
|
|
1
 |
YoMeR United States. Jan 11 2012 16:32. Posts 12435 | | |
I think you are losing mad monies by making this fold.
Sure you were right this time but does that villain always have set here? highly doubtful. |
| |
|
|
1
|
Tensai176 Canada. Jan 11 2012 17:13. Posts 1018 | | |
I would've lost my monies |
|
|
1
| |
| | On January 11 2012 15:32 YoMeR wrote:
I think you are losing mad monies by making this fold.
|
|
|
| how can u shove the river, he cant possibly call with worse -TalentedTom | |
|
|
1
|
GoTuNk Chile. Jan 11 2012 17:49. Posts 2860 | | | |
|
|
|
