1
 |
domyouji Zimbabwe. Mar 18 2009 05:06. Posts 435 | | |
so monday was pretty good day, up 4 bi in like 1k hands and then insta quit to watch prime time tv. Today was different though, got coolered a ton throughout and it seems I still can't control my swings as my graph is going up n down n shit, I really need some advice on how to just keep profiting and stop the retarded spewments
even when I'm coolered and suckedout a ton, I'm still a pretty marginal winner, guess thats good
|
|
| to live the dream you gotta play the game | |
|
|
1
 |
Exhilarate United States. Mar 18 2009 05:12. Posts 5453 | | |
keep grinding and stop spewing. make better reads, maybe fewer tables for a bit (10-15) instead of 24
gl |
|
|
0
 |
dogmeat Czech Republic. Mar 18 2009 05:29. Posts 6374 | | |
isn't this totally irelevant samplesize for 24 tabling? |
| |
|
|
1
|
Exhilarate United States. Mar 18 2009 05:37. Posts 5453 | | |
not really, he's 24 tabling FR and this was one session, so it's a good sample size |
|
|
0
|
dogmeat Czech Republic. Mar 18 2009 05:49. Posts 6374 | | |
| | On March 18 2009 04:37 Exhilarate wrote:
not really, he's 24 tabling FR and this was one session, so it's a good sample size |
i know its fr, but for 24tabling decent samplesize is like 100k imo |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Monsteroso Korea (South). Mar 18 2009 15:57. Posts 45 | | |
Why should the number of tables affect a sample size? |
|
|
1
 |
PokerDoc88 Australia. Mar 29 2009 23:37. Posts 3527 | | |
coz ur winrate will be lower so given a particular variance in bb/100 winnings, it's going to be harder to spot your true winning trend.
eg: multitable with a true winrate of 2bb/100, with a SD of 1.5bb/100. So over 100k hands you can expect to see 0.5-3.5bb/100 as the winrate.
drop the number of tables to 6, your winrate goes way up to 5bb/100, and you'll have a winrate of 3.5-6.5bb/100 which is far easier to notice in less hands. |
|
|
|
