FTP - Still struggling.

LoL,just realized my graph looks like a EKG of someone coming back to life.

Lets hope that does happen.

You can get up to 10 or 12 max tables if you e-mail FTP and request they increase your limit.

NoiqPoker = partypoker ? ^^

Hm , i am also in need of a good site with rakeback.
I made +238$ this month on PartyPoker but with 30% rakeback i d have additional 150$ or so which is alot compared to my total winnings. T_T

FT is no choice for me either ... i got disconnection problems there and they closed my rakeback account cause i allready had a playmoney account opend that i had never used .
That was so mean.

Dont know about UB ? good software,many players and good rakeback is it worth a try

Problem is Pokerstars and Partypoker are the best sites traffic and softwarewise but they have no rakeback.

And concerning your rollercoaster graph.
here is a short impression of some excerpt from this month ( As i wroite in my blog PT misses lots of hands due to Party Poker problems so i cut out the money cause its not accurate eitehr way) so this is just a good overall impression of how it went for me most of the time this month ^^



GL in the future
<3

Stars > Full Tilt. I made that switch and I don't see myself going back.

On September 23 2007 14:10 JerseyMuscle wrote: Stars > Full Tilt. I made that switch and I don't see myself going back.

switch to stars is not worth it until you are able to become supernova... rakeback >> anything for micro and low stakes players

On September 23 2007 14:34 BlizzY wrote: Show nested quote + On September 23 2007 14:10 JerseyMuscle wrote: Stars > Full Tilt. I made that switch and I don't see myself going back. switch to stars is not worth it until you are able to become supernova... rakeback >> anything for micro and low stakes players

i grind 10-12 hrs a day.

Sup? :D

but now that I know i can get 12 tables on FTP that rockz,emailed support.

FTP > all for microstakes players. rakeback kicks in, no way stars can compete there. Traffic is better than on party and software nice and smooth for me.

On September 23 2007 15:49 Royal_Rumble wrote: FTP > all for microstakes players. rakeback kicks in, no way stars can compete there. Traffic is better than on party and software nice and smooth for me.

I strongly disagree, the skill level, at least at 6 max, I don't know about 9 max, is alot higher on ftp than stars, and it is completely not worth the 8 buyins/30k hands and the bonus. I guess it's great for improving your game and having five 15/10/5 guys sit down on your tables every time you play a session, but it is just not nearly as profitable as the fishiness on stars.

On September 23 2007 16:41 Drowsy wrote: Show nested quote + On September 23 2007 15:49 Royal_Rumble wrote: FTP > all for microstakes players. rakeback kicks in, no way stars can compete there. Traffic is better than on party and software nice and smooth for me. I strongly disagree, the skill level, at least at 6 max, I don't know about 9 max, is alot higher on ftp than stars, and it is completely not worth the 8 buyins/30k hands and the bonus. I guess it's great for improving your game and having five 15/10/5 guys sit down on your tables every time you play a session, but it is just not nearly as profitable as the fishiness on stars.

Its true the skill level IS stronger then stars,but I don't have anything against that,but beside that FTP really is a bad beat central.

But you know...What doesnt kill you makes it stronger,so now after I've emailed support and requested they get me 12 tables max I might even stick here until I am confident and properly rolled to be crushing 3x bigger limits at stars.

ftp is a mindfuck site for your poker game when your in the microstakes levels and just trying to learn to improve. ive seen some pretty tight players grind 25nl for like 6months there and still cant move up. also ive noticed a lot of bot-like players at the microstakes who never move up, inspite of having a ridiculous winrate. maybe im just paranoid, but i dont see anyone here who's grinded from micro to med/highstakes here all from playing FTP. unlike in stars.

LoL @ ppl still saying FTP is rigged

you can lol if you play at ftp and started from microstakes level to medstakes. medstakes is kinda fair ive noticed, but never at the microstakes

that winrate is terrible you must have some serious serious leaks try to improve faster