Aspergers

So which drug are you on right now?

-

If you have a strip of paper with a number of blue stripes and a number plus or minus one of the blue stripes, as white strips, then have someone hold that paper in front of you, without you knowing the numbers, and moving it side to side, how you look at the paper can tell a lot about you. For me, I focus on one point more often than not, however, neurotypicals will move their heads and eyes as well.

Is femininity an evolutionary advantageous trait in modern civilization? Weird how it's purported that there are three MtF (transgendered) to every one FtM. I mean, to increase our survival rate, since we are no longer in the wild, but cooped up next to each other, would more estrogen provide less violence amongst ourselves?

-

Assburgers

You know a hoax or flawed thinking when perfectly defined and concrete words such as rationalization and empiricism are butchered into cult-lingo words that try to make their shitty theory more englobing as if it somehow were a deeper yet more basic and understandable truth, like "feminity" and "masculinity".

This seems like an oversimplification. Sometimes zip will work, sometimes it won't. The problem is making that differentiation. A lot of the time it depends on body language but if you're not catching that then you'll constantly be making bad decisions

On March 07 2013 12:18 pinbaLL wrote: Assburgers

this is the only thing that comes to my mind when someone says aspergers

-

-

On March 08 2013 06:33 2c0ntent wrote: Show nested quote + On March 07 2013 15:18 Baalim wrote: You know a hoax or flawed thinking when perfectly defined and concrete words such as rationalization and empiricism are butchered into cult-lingo words that try to make their shitty theory more englobing as if it somehow were a deeper yet more basic and understandable truth, like "feminity" and "masculinity". You know someone doesn't understand what you're talking about, is too lazy or scared to take a moment to cogitate and learn some vocabulary, and possesses unnecessary bitterness when they respond with unthinking vitriol such as the above. If you knew the whole definitions of the words you are reading you'd see that they are used perfectly in line with their meanings. You should try to recognize opportunities to effect fluid thinking and consider partaking in the excitement that comes with learning something new, especially since we are on the same side on most issues due to the similar moral precepts which we hold. Also note that you are not a native english speaker. BTW asking questions happens frequently in real life. the funny thing about internet forums is that they are much more like message boards than discussion boards. 93% of posters leave their message, read others' messages, and never ask questions of one another. Doesn't seem that'd work very well for learning or sharing things..

it doesnt seem as if your main aim here is to learn and share from people. i get the impression youre desperately trying to appear smart by using a lot of unnecessary fancy lingo when in many cases, just straight talking with normal words will convey the same meaning and will spare people the time wasted "cogitating and learning some vocabulary". when youre not spouting off shit like "ex post facto" youre berating people lol.. why so douchey?

in reply to the conversation, a good place to start for having more success in social situations is to have and show more respect for people youre talking with (perfect example itt and many other of your posts that you could improve in this area)

-

that thread was full of you being very wrong in your understanding of math and very disrespectful to people who had the patience to try and explain it to you so i dont see your point on that one. "I am right and if you disagree with me you must be an idiot and i'll treat you like one" is a rotten attitude to have in any situation but it's especially unsightly in cases like that thread when you arent even right

-

"For an example of the anti-me, read David Sedaris and similar pop-nerd authors"

Laughable comparison because you are not an author, you are a blogger.

-

to put what kets saying in a quote:

hey i genuinely will, thanks for the recommendation.


I clicked on your blog because of this comment in the Hugo Chavez thread:
"I appreciate the cleaner's input here, everything else has just been noise from 3rd party 'data'"

I completely agree with that and do respect you, just think you're arrogant.

I'll check that book out soon. Let's break my self-delusions