So my gf had to work all day saturday and I thought that it would be a great time to go up and play some poker. My local casino is about 45 minutes away sometimes less depending on the traffic. I usually play 3/5 nl here with a max buyin of $500 and a max bet of $500 due to washington state law, but when I arrived I saw 1 guy that I was pretty sure was a fish waiting to get into the 5/10 game. Since the game was about to start I said aww fuck it Ill try a buyin of 1k and give it a go. I was willing to lose this plus maybe another bullet.
The game started 7 handed. There was at least 1 "live pro" at the table and more like 1.5, the second guy being a person who supplements his income a lot from poker. The other guys all knew each other and talked like they played all the time so they were regs. I definitely didnt assume that they were all good just because they were regs so I took my time to figure it out.
After about 30 minutes of feeling out the table there was 2 soft spots. 1 guy who was in for 2500 was a recreational guy that loved to suck out on people with gut shots etc, and another short stacker that only bought it for 500. I had raised about 3 times within 4 hands before this first big hand happened. I decided to mix it up and limp ak suited under the gun. It got folded around to the blinds completed and checked to the flop. V1 was the short stacker in the small blind and v2 was the big blind and he was a guy that seemed pretty solid but didnt like to be pushed around. He had played back at a few guys by check raising continuation and calling down with middle pair. Flop was K58 two hearts. V1 checks, V2 bets 35. I raise to $80 V1 calls and V2 makes it $180. Right here I almost thought about folding but I had under repped my hand super hard it just didnt look like ak. He could have a k here easily. He also could have a set, or even a hand like 58. Hero calls $180 and V1 calls also leaving only $300 behind for me. I was pretty sure at this point the guy had a hand like 67 or a flush draw. Turn is A. V1 checks V2 bets $300. The only hand that i am loosing to now is 55 and 88. It seemed like a tough spot because usually live players dont play a naked king this hard nor 58 even, just usually sets. I was super confused. I thought about it for a while and decided that I have some fold equity if he had a combo draw, because I was not going to fold for my last $500. I ended up shipping over the top. V1 called and V2 called. River was a J. V1 insta-mucked saying he missed and v2 said he had a king. I turned over my hand and he mucked. Thoughts? Should I have played it safe and just mucked the flop or the turn here.
I won another pretty good hand later where two guys called my 3 bet to $100 pre when I had KK. flop was q94 two clubs. I bet 180 and they both called. The turn was a 9 which didnt seem like it hit either of them the way the action was pre. I didnt have the king of clubs either. I led for $400 and V1 called and v2 mucked. V1 called for a club. The river was a the K of clubs. I thought for a minute and bet $500 which is the max bet and he reluctantly called saying i must have kings. Pretty good read but then why did he call? lol.
Final big hand of the night I had aces under the gun. I raised to $35. This guy who I had marked as a spot above, the guy who liked to call a lot with gutters and bad draws, min raises to 65. He loves this for some reason, the click back 3 bet. Everyone folds and its back to me and I know he wont fold for anything reasonable so I make it $160 to go. He knows that I am capable of running a bluff because I had to show down a hand 2 hands earlier that was KJ high after a guy called the river with an underpair to the board and had commented on it "nice try young man". Anyways the flop comes 447R. I bet $200 and he thinks and calls. The turn is a J bringing a possible flush draw. I picked up that he wasnt going to raise. He had a stack of 25's in his hand like he was ready to call. Maybe it is just something about live but it seemed like he didnt have jacks here. Maybe im crazy. I bet $400 and he counts it out and calls. The river comes a K. He immediately looks down at his chips to see how much he has. Seems like a bad sign. Kings in this spot would make some sense, but he is pretty aggressive so why didnt he raise the flop or the turn? Im still searching to find a hand that he would play this way and only 10's really came to mind. The other hand was kk that he was trying to get tricky with. I checked the river, know that I could have to bet fold if he raised. He announces same bet and bets $400. Only hands i lose to here are kk and jj. i dont think he has 7s ever but i guess its possible the way he played it. It just seemed a lot like 10's or 9's. But that means he put me on ak the whole way to call and then i hit a king it didnt seem to make sense. I ended up making the crying call because the pot was pretty big and he turned over ak and i raked the pot. Anyone have some advice on this hand? Seems like anywhere else the hand might be different but because of the max $500 bet in washington Its almost an auto call on the river. Its 400 to win almost $2000.
I ended the session up 3.3k which was an awesome score. The game changed a lot and looked like it was going to break when lots of the players moved over to the 5/10/25 PLO game. Its nice to reaffirm my trip to vegas wasnt a fluke and Im not just running good I seem to be playing decently well also.
Got back from Korea after some family issues, started playing live poker again. I was taking a shot at 5/10 and it was late like 4 am. As I went to go cash out, I overheard a few phrases from 2 regs like "splitting profits", "signaling". I don't have any concrete proof that they are cheating/colluding, but I was wondering what were some common ways for people to cheat at nlhe.
I've been thinking about it alot lately, and I dont think it's all that great to leverage 2 stacks to split 1 so even in a spot where you and your partner have say flush and straight draws, the opponent is getting 2:1 on his money with lets say TPTK and you are risking 2 for every 1 dollar, and then splitting it with your partner. Iono if it's still that profitable but I don't think it's all that great of a way to cheat.
But basically I was wondering if there were any common hustles I should be wary of.
damn smashed up my latop screen on tilt here you see my new grindstation. I know people said nice view and stuff last time but really here you see the real situation most of the time with the fog. This cute dog is getting damn annoying too I can't even est sn spple without it staring at me begging.
Anyway would like to sweat some micro plo guys would be flattered if interest even though im not qualified I hope i can spot something free of couse.
check out my attempt at anti tilt playlist> http://grooveshark.com/playlist/Forhelviti+s+Playlist+1/69374788
Hey guys!
The Songkran festival is celebrated in Thailand as the traditional New Year's Day from 13 to 15 April. It coincides with the New Year of many calendars of South and Southeast Asia. The most obvious celebration of Songkran is the throwing of water. Thais roam the streets with containers of water or water guns (sometimes mixed with mentholated talc), or post themselves at the side of roads with a garden hose and drench each other and passersby.
Not sure how many of you look for music outside of what you hear on the radio/already know of, but I wanted to share some bands here that I've been enjoying a lot recently. They're mostly independent musicians (meaning currently unsigned) so their popularity is largely gained through word of mouth and I'd like to spread the word.
Being - DNA
Progressive metal band from Florida. Their lyric material focuses mainly on the exploration of space and the human mind, as well as technological advances that can help us with both. Their debut EP "Arrival" is available free on their Soundcloud page ( http://soundcloud.com/beingmusic ) and their debut album is set to drop later this year. They've enlisted Misha Mansoor (Periphery, Haunted Shores) and Casey Sabol (Periphery) to produce that album, and the preview is also available on their Soundcloud. http://www.facebook.com/beingmusic
The Omega Experiment - Karma
Progressive metal band from Michigan. Those familiar with Devin Townsend and his work will almost surely enjoy this. Their self-titled debut album, which is being touted by many independent music fansites as the potential best progressive metal album of 2012, is available on their Bandcamp page ( http://theomegaexperiment.bandcamp.com/album/the-omega-experiment ) for $7. http://www.facebook.com/theomegaexperiment
Corelia - Glass Faces
Progressive metal from California. I've just recently discovered these guys, but their 2011 debut EP Nostalgia is available on their Bandcamp page ( http://corelia.bandcamp.com/ ) for $5. They incorporate a lot of technical guitar and drum work under incredibly melodic vocal lines that make their songs flow very well. http://www.facebook.com/CoreliaBand
I have to run out now for the day but I hope you guys enjoy this! I'll post more if there's any interest.
Sup guys, time for a mid-April poker update. This month has been pretty lame as far as results go. I'm stuck about 1500 on the month. I haven't been playing particularly good or bad. I did make one really dumb river fold in a spot where it was a clear call and cost myself a 3k pot. So tack 3k onto my totals and I'd be up a little bit overall.
My average session length for this month looks very high at 8.4 hours per session, compared to my YTD average of 6.95 hours per session. That's because last week was my wife's spring break so I didn't have as strict of a schedule to adhere to from the 1st-7th. This month has been pretty laid back so far because of it as well, as I took Easter off and then played Mon and Tues, followed by Wed/Thur off. I'll be back at it tonight and tomorrow night though.
I didn't count Easter as an extra day off since it's a holiday, but technically it'll be 3 days off this week, and will shorten my overall days of play for the month. Even so I think I will manage to get in 150 hours, and hopefully 160. I'm at 58.75 hours now with 18 days left including today, so if I play 12 out of the 18 days I'll need to average 7.6 hours per session to get to 150. If I stay at my 8.4 hour rate I will just barely hit 160. So hopefully everything falls nicely into place and I can wrap this month up with a little upswing to get back on pace with my Challenge.
I'm 37.4% of the way there, but I only have about 32% of the time left to get there. I'll be grinding hard these next two weeks and do a last month breakdown of how likely I think I am to get there in my last month. Wish me luck!
Short stack strategy at the micros - thoughts?by tirceol, April 12
So I read through the majority of Getting Started in Hold 'em (Ed Miller) as plugged by Jelle in this article... so how do you guys feel about the short stack strategy described?
1. Buy in with table minimum.
2. Play only premium hands (early high pairs and AK, mid another pair or two and AQs/AQ, late more pairs and AJ/AT)
3. Bet as much as you think you can while still drawing callers with (most likely) inferior hands.
4. Shove after the flop.
On a related note, I'm playing at Carbon right now (US player lolz) but their micro stakes $0.02/$0.04 tables' min buy in is $1.20 which is 30x BB... basically qualifies for medium stack per the book... do you think short stack strategy works when your minimum starting stack is 30x BB?
Hello, saturday is going to be the "celebrity takedown" in a casino in quebec.
I obv won a satty for it. 310$ buyin (was 550 but it includes a meal + night at hotelroom)with 150 players. Bounty of 500$ on the 10 or so celebs that are going to be there. I'm kinda super excited, as this is my biggest buyin mtt lifetime (if you exclude the 428 hyper-turbo sngs lawl), and I have a very low quantity of live play experiences.
I wanted to get some tips maybe... theres stuff I won't think about that might make a difference.
The mtt is going to start at 10AM, which is super early for me. I still have a week to get used to waking up early, but I am considering a small dose of caffeine intake. (my caffeine resistance is super low since i never use that stuff really, but im scared to hit a "low" after a while)
I would think I should dress up like a normal person, aka no poker gears, to hide my superior-than-these-noobs-experience, altho I love my lp/stars shirts. ^^
I prob won't use sunglasses, but I have never played in a casino so I don't know how needed they are or not.
Want to win more money at poker? Millions? Yes, you say? Give me your first born and your attention.
Most people here have very poor attention / reading skills, which translates to their poker playing/quality/success; Poor attention control also spills over into most peoples' unproductive life.
Your first step to being more successful is: Controlling your Attention
I’ve just been reading Luke’s “Crash Course in the Neuroscience of Human Motivation.” It is a useful text, although there are a few technical errors and a few bits of outdated information (see [1], updated information about one particular quibble in [2] and [3]).
There is one significant missing piece, however, which is of critical importance for our subject matter here on LW: the effect of attention on plasticity, including the plasticity of motivation. Since I don’t see any other texts addressing it directly (certainly not from a neuroscientific perspective), let’s cover the main idea here.
Summary for impatient readers: focus of attention physically determines which synapses in your brain get stronger, and which areas of your cortex physically grow in size. The implications of this provide direct guidance for alteration of behaviors and motivational patterns. This is used for this purpose extensively: for instance, many benefits of the Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy approach rely on this mechanism.
I – Attention and plasticity
To illustrate this properly, we need to define two terms. I’m guessing these are very familiar to most readers here, but let’s cover them briefly just in case.
First thing to keep in mind is the plasticity of cortical maps. In essence, particular functional areas of our brain can expand or shrink based on how often (and how intensely) they are used. A small amount of this growth is physical, as new axons grow, expanding the white matter; most of it happens by repurposing any less-used circuitry in the vicinity of the active area. For example, our sense of sight is processed by our visual cortex, which turns signals from our eyes into lines, shapes, colors and movement. In blind people, however, this part of the brain becomes invaded by other senses, and begins to process sensations like touch and hearing, such that they become significantly more sensitive than in sighted people. Similarly, in deaf people, auditory cortex (part of the brain that processes sounds) becomes adapted to process visual information and gather language clues by sight.
Second concept we’ll need is somatosensory cortex (SSC for short). This is an area of the (vertebrate) brain where most of the incoming touch and positional (proprioceptive) sensations from the body converge. There is a map-like quality to this part of our brain, as every body part links to a particular bit of the SSC surface (which can be illustrated with silly-looking things, such as the sensory homunculus). More touch-sensitive areas of the body have larger corresponding areas within the SSC.
With these two in mind, let’s consider one actual experiment [4]. Scientists measured and mapped the area of an owl monkey’s SSC which became activated when one of his fingertips was touched. The monkey was then trained to hold that finger on a tactile stimulator – a moving wheel that stimulates touch receptors. The monkey had to pay attention to the stimulus, and was rewarded for letting go upon detecting certain changes in spinning frequency. After a few weeks of training, the area was measured again.
As you probably expected, the area had grown larger. The touch-processing neurons grew out, co-opting surrounding circuitry in order to achieve better and faster processing of the stimulus that produced the reward. Which is, so far, just another way of showing plasticity of cortical maps.
But then, there is something else. The SSC area expanded only when the monkey had to pay attention to the sensation of touch in order to receive the reward. If a monkey was trained to keep a hand on the wheel that moved just the same, but he did not have to pay attention to it… the cortical map remained the same size. This finding has since been replicated in humans, many times (for instance [5, 6]).
Take a moment to consider what this means.
A man is sitting in his living room, in front of a chessboard. Classical music plays in the background. The man is focused, thinking about the next move, about his chess strategy, and about the future possibilities of the game. His neural networks are optimizing, making him a better chess player.
A man is sitting in his living room, in front of a chessboard. Classical music plays in the background. The man is focused, thinking about the music he hears, listening to the chords and anticipating the sounds still to come. His neural networks are optimizing, making him better at understanding music and hearing subtleties within a melody.
A man is sitting in his living room, in front of a chessboard. Classical music plays in the background. The man is focused, gritting his teeth as another flash of pain comes from his bad back. His neural networks are optimizing, making the pain more intense, easier to feel, harder to ignore.
II – Practical implications: making and breaking habits, efficacy of CBT
Habitual learned behaviors are often illustrated with the example of driving. When we are learning to drive, we have to pay attention to everything: when to push the pedals, when to signal, where to hold our hands… A few years later, these behaviors become so automatic, we hardly pay attention at all. Indeed, most of us can drive for hours while carrying on conversations or listening to audiobooks. We are completely unaware, as our own body keeps pushing pedals, signaling turns, and changing gears.
We can therefore say that driving behaviors, through practice and attention, eventually become automatic – which is, most of the time, a good thing. But so do many other things, including some destructive ones we might want to get rid of. Let’s take a simple one: nail biting. You are reading, or watching a movie, or thinking, or driving… when you suddenly notice some minor pain, and realize that you have chewed your nail into a ragged stump. Ouch!
You catch yourself biting, you stop. Five minutes later, you catch yourself biting again. You stop again. Repeat ad infinitum, or ad nauseam, whichever comes first.
Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy has a highly successful approach for breaking habits, which requires only a very subtle alteration to this process. You notice that you are biting your nails. You immediately focus your attention on what you are doing, and you stop doing it. No rage, no blaming yourself, no negative emotions. You just stop, and you focus all the attention you can on the act of stopping. You move your arm down, focusing your attention on the act of movement, on the feeling of your arm going down, away from your mouth. That’s it. You can go back to whatever you were doing.
Five minutes later, you notice yourself biting your nails again. You calmly repeat the procedure again.
By doing this, you are training yourself to perform a new behavior – the “stop and put the hand down” behavior – which is itself triggered by the nail-biting behavior. As you go along, you will get better and better at noticing that you have started to bite your nails. You will also get better and better at stopping and putting your hand down. After a while, this will become semi-automatic; you’ll notice that your hand went to your mouth, a nail touched your tooth, and the hand went back down before you could do anything. Don’t stop training: focus your attention on the “stop and drop” part of the action.
After a while, the nail-biting simply goes away. Of course, the more complex and more ingrained a habit is, the more effort and time will be needed to break it. But for most people, even strong habits can be relatively quickly weakened, or redirected into less destructive behaviors.
It’s probably obvious that habits can be created in this way as well. We don’t become better at things we do – we become better at things we pay attention to while we’re doing them. If you want to make exercise a habit, your efforts will be much more effective if you focus your attention on your exercise technique, rather than repeatedly thinking how painful and tiring the whole process is.
There is also a direct implication for training in any complex skill. Start with the well-known learning curve effect: we gain a lot of skill relatively quickly, and then improvements slow down incrementally as we approach our maximum potential skill level. It is relatively easy to go from a poor to a mediocre tennis player; it is much, much harder to go from mediocre to good, and even harder to go from good to excellent.
Complex skills have many different aspects, which we usually attempt to train simultaneously. We can become very good at some, while staying poor at others. The optimal approach would be to focus most of our attention on those aspects where our abilities are weakest, since smaller investments of time and effort will lead to larger improvements in skill.
To keep with the tennis metaphor, one could become very good at controlling the ball direction and spin, while still having a poor awareness of the opponent’s position. Simply playing more will improve both aspects further, but our hypothetical player should optimally try to focus her attention on opponent awareness [7].
Finally, there is another implication which I’ll leave as an exercise for the readers. Mindfulness meditation, which essentially boils down to training control of attention, has been shown to exert a positive effect on many, many different things (lowering depression, anxiety and stress, as well as improving productivity [8, 9, 10]). In the light of the previous text, one obvious reason why better control over attention can produce all these beneficial effects should immediately come to mind.
---------------------------
No cliffs, however, putting some of this into context for poker:
-playing mass tables constantly will kill your future intelligent growth in poker
-playing when distracted can result in the same thing as mass tabling
-playing when tired/unfocus can lead to some stroke of genius/creative moments
-playing when fully focused and gathering all the information you can at the tables will increase your "poker IQ" and actual brain growth
-mixing in sessions of deep focus and sessions with less focus under conditions such as 'tiredness' could bring you new strategy concepts
Personal
-I always have found my best months come from alternating my sessions between afternoon focused sessions and late night sessions where I am more tired. Playing 1-2 sessions each day in this fashion has increased my winrate.
**
I do not want your first born
Weak attempt at grabbing your attention
++++++++++++++++++=
Additionally, here is light reading for why mixing in focus with less focus throughout your day can achieve greater knowledge and understanding
Here’s a brain teaser: Your task is to move a single line so that the false arithmetic statement below becomes true.
IV = III + III
Did you get it? In this case, the solution is rather obvious – you should move the first “I” to the right side of the “V,” so that the statement now reads: VI = III + III. Not surprisingly, the vast majority of people (92 percent) quickly solve this problem, as it requires a standard problem-solving approach in which only the answer is altered. What’s perhaps a bit more surprising is that nearly 90 percent of patients with brain damage to the prefrontal lobes — this leaves them with severe attentional deficits, unable to control their mental spotlight — are also able to find the answer.
Here’s a much more challenging equation to fix:
III = III + III
In this case, only 43 percent of normal subjects were able to solve the problem. Most stared at the Roman numerals for a few minutes and then surrendered. The patients who couldn’t pay attention, however, had an 82 percent success rate. What accounts for this bizarre result? Why does brain damage dramatically improve performance on a hard creative task? The explanation is rooted in the unexpected nature of the solution, which involves moving the vertical matchstick in the plus sign, transforming it into an equal sign. (The equation is now a simple tautology: III = III = III.) The reason this puzzle is so difficult, at least for people without brain damage, has to do with the standard constraints of math problems. Because we’re not used to thinking about the operator, most people quickly fix their attention on the roman numerals. But that’s a dead end. The patients with a severe cognitive deficit, in contrast, can’t restrict their search. They are forced by their brain injury to consider a much wider range of possible answers. And this is why they’re nearly twice as likely to have a breakthrough.
Of course, this doesn’t mean you should take a hammer to your frontal lobes. Being able to direct the spotlight of attention is a crucial talent. However, the creative upside of brain damage — the unexpected benefits of not being able to focus — does reveal something important about the imagination. Sometimes, it helps to consider irrelevant information, to eavesdrop on all the stray associations unfolding in the far reaches of the brain. We are more likely to find the answer because we have less control over where we look.
This helps explain a new study led by Mareike Wieth at Albion College. The scientists surveyed 428 undergrads about their circadian habits, asking them whether they were more productive and alert in the morning or evening. As expected, the overwhelming majority were night owls, which is why they studiously avoided 9 a.m. classes. Then, the scientists gave the students a series of problem-solving tasks. Half of these tasks were creative insight puzzles, in which the answer arrives suddenly and seemingly out of nowhere. Here’s a sample insight puzzle:
A man has married 20 women in a small town. All of the women are still alive and none of them are divorced. The man has broken no laws. Who is the man?
And here’s another classic puzzle:
Marsha and Marjorie were born on the same day of the same month of the same year to the same mother and the same father, yet they are not twins. How is that possible?
Did you solve these brain teasers? (The answers are, respectively, priest and triplets.)
The other half of the problems given to the students were standard analytic problems, such as long-division and pre-algebra equations. These questions don’t require insights. Instead, they benefit from ordinary focus, as people grind out the answer and check to make sure it’s right. The subjects were given four minutes to solve each problem. Half of them were tested early in the morning (8:30 a.m.) and half were tested in the late afternoon (around 5 p.m.).
The results are a testament to the creative virtues of grogginess. When people were tested during their “least optimal time of day” — think of that night owl stumbling into the lab in the early morning — they were significantly more effective at solving insight puzzles. (On one problem, their performance increased by nearly 50 percent.) Performance on the analytic problems, meanwhile, was unaffected by the clock.
The larger lesson is that those sleepy students, like a brain-damaged patient, benefit from the inability to focus. Their minds are drowsy and disorganized, humming with associations that they’d normally ignore. When we need an insight, of course, those stray associations are the source of the answer.
One last piece of evidence: A brand-new study by scientists at the University of Illinois at Chicago compared performance on insight puzzles between sober and drunk students. (They were aiming for real intoxication, giving students enough booze to achieve a blood alcohol level of 0.075.) Once the students achieved “peak intoxication” the scientists gave them a battery of word problems – they’re known as remote associate tests – that are often solved in a moment of insight. Here’s a sample problem. Your task is to find the one additional word that goes with the following triad of words:
Cracker Union Rabbit
In this case, the answer is “jack.” According to the data, drunk students solved more of these word problems in less time. They also were much more likely to perceive their solutions as the result of a sudden insight. And the differences were dramatic: The alcohol made subjects nearly 30 percent more likely to find the unexpected solution.
Once again, the explanation for this effect returns us to the benefits of not being able to pay attention. The stupor of alcohol, like the haze of the early morning, makes it harder for us to ignore those unlikely thoughts and remote associations that are such important elements of the imagination. So the next time you are in need of insight, avoid caffeine and concentration. Don’t chain yourself to your desk. Instead, set the alarm a few minutes early and wallow in your groggy thoughts. And if that doesn’t work, chug a beer.
It recently came to our attention that there was a small glitch in our system benefiting some members with the ability to never be charged but always have full access to the site. You are receiving this email because you are one of those members. Whether you realized it or not, you have had complete and unlimited access to BlueFirePoker (some people for over a year), yet have never paid a cent We obviously will not ask you now to pay for that time period.
Your account has now been disabled, however, if you wish to regain access to the site we are willing to waive the signup fee for you. Simply shoot us an email and I will be happy to help you out with a coupon code!
Sorry once again for the inconvenience. Please let me know if you have any further questions and I would be happy to help you out!
Contact Users: 1055 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 09:18
We obviously will not ask you now to pay for that time period.
,
,
,
,