Holly fucked up, she was 3:1 on rounds, if she took it slow and didnt give her back she could have cruised to a decision win, hard to take that decisions on the spot though.
But yeah I kinda agree fuck point fighting and Holly is simply waaaay too cautious its boring
felt like conor was toying around way too much and then got hit with some hard shots and went downhill from there. still expect him to be the new king on featherweight if he moves down again though.
im a regular at nl5
1
goose58 United States. Mar 06 2016 07:12. Posts 871
Can't believe Conor got smashed so easy.. reach really does matter a lot. Volume of strikes seemed in favor of Nate simply because he had more favorable openings with little risk of getting countered
Nate is durable as fuck, Connor was already slowing down before getting hit with that straight right, after that he simply couldn't recover and it was already over
Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online
1
NMcNasty United States. Mar 06 2016 07:14. Posts 2039
Conor looked sloppy and overconfident but he was still winning most of the fight. Just gassed himself with too many whiffed uppercuts. Great fight and should be a good rematch.
On March 01 2016 23:36 alejandicto wrote:
I just made a crazy parlay: 20 bucks on Miesha Tate + Nate Diaz (+1495)
I just won 300 dollars, I dont even know why I made that parlay LOL
crazy fucking night
Well done, should've taken both by sub obviously :D
3
PuertoRican United States. Mar 06 2016 07:19. Posts 13051
On March 06 2016 06:12 goose58 wrote:
Can't believe Conor got smashed so easy.. reach really does matter a lot. Volume of strikes seemed in favor of Nate simply because he had more favorable openings with little risk of getting countered
Conor wasn't used to ever facing a guy who threw so many punches and wouldn't go down after tasting his left hand.
I worry that Conor might have an issue cutting so much weight again to fight at 145. Hopefully the same thing doesn't happen to Conor as what happened to Roy Jones Jr. in boxing.
Saddens me a bit we wont see Conor vs Lawler, but i guess its a good thing, Lawler would probably have humiliated Conor.
And now what does Conor do? It makes no sense to do him vs Lawler now. He obviously won't face other 170s.
He cannot really be facing RDA now.
Cutting to face Frankie would be hard.
james9994: make note dont play against floofy, ;(
Last edit: 06/03/2016 07:21
1
soberstone United States. Mar 06 2016 07:20. Posts 2662
That was seriously one of the best fights I've ever seen.
McGregor with a flawless round a half, and then all of a sudden when Diaz was still not the least bit tired and McGregor threw the kitchen sink at him, it switched on a dime and Diaz went sav Diaz. McGregor broke and panicked/quit to shoot for that sloppy takedown.
Diaz with the submission.
So epic.
Last edit: 06/03/2016 07:21
1
soberstone United States. Mar 06 2016 07:25. Posts 2662
On March 06 2016 06:19 Floofy wrote:
Saddens me a bit we wont see Conor vs Lawler, but i guess its a good thing, Lawler would probably have humiliated Conor.
And now what does Conor do? It makes no sense to do him vs Lawler now. He obviously won't face other 170s.
He cannot really be facing RDA now.
Cutting to face Frankie would be hard.
Maybe but the fight wouldn't have looked anything like that. Lawler's defense is damn good but his chin probably couldn't have handled what McGregor just dished out. Lawler also isn't a sav on the ground. I think it would have been an epic fight.
Diaz has one the most perfect overalsl style to beat McGregor and it showed. It wasn't like Conor didn't show amazing speed, power, and accuracy, and he actually swept Diaz in the first.
United States. Mar 06 2016 07:14. Posts 2039
