I was bluffing but then Im like how can he have the str8 if I have 77... J9 was a str8 too

i never thought bluffing in omaha was possible. you have to shove every hand, cuz you always have odds, right?

of course bluffing is possible.

esp with blockers. but this seems like a bad bluff, even if u had JJ-blockers. I mean- he is not really folding to 15 more dollars anyway.

^notsureifserious

Pre seems way too loose, and I think on the turn your in a lotttt of trouble when he ships

On March 26 2012 08:17 SpasticInk wrote: of course bluffing is possible. esp with blockers. but this seems like a bad bluff, even if u had JJ-blockers. I mean- he is not really folding to 15 more dollars anyway.

bahahah. There is such a thin line between sick level and stupidity. Tho it is obvious which side of the line this one is on.

yeah the whole point is I didnt realize the J9 made a str8 so I thought he was just getting it in with some strong combodraw that I was doing well enough against, which may or may not be retarded but obviously had I realized there was another str8 other than 79 on board I would have mucked.

to clarify I posted this as a goofy fail hand not some serious close spot or anything ^^

Really dont see why you open that hand UTG

if he folded his last $15, this would be HOTW

On March 26 2012 09:59 gebbstet wrote: Really dont see why you open that hand UTG

+1

On March 26 2012 08:26 EvilSky wrote: ^notsureifserious

what? he did only have 15, wtf kind of bluff is that even w/ 99 or JJ?

come at me bro trolls !

On March 26 2012 10:54 player999 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 26 2012 08:26 EvilSky wrote: ^notsureifserious what? he did only have 15, wtf kind of bluff is that even w/ 99 or JJ?

loool

On March 26 2012 10:54 player999 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 26 2012 08:26 EvilSky wrote: ^notsureifserious what? he did only have 15, wtf kind of bluff is that even w/ 99 or JJ?

Not sure if serious but he evilsky most likely meant he was bluffing with his 2nd barell bet, not the ship...

sadly, having 2 blockers doesnt preclude your opponent from having a straight. if 79 was the only straight, he can still have XX97 which is a shitton of combos. it's amazing how often they do have "it"

On March 26 2012 13:27 Daut wrote: sadly, having 2 blockers doesnt preclude your opponent from having a straight. if 79 was the only straight, he can still have XX97 which is a shitton of combos. it's amazing how often they do have "it"

Hm then maybe there is actually some merit in playing hands like 7777 etc. - then they cant have it for sure

On March 26 2012 12:47 Joe wrote: Show nested quote + On March 26 2012 10:54 player999 wrote:   On March 26 2012 08:26 EvilSky wrote: ^notsureifserious what? he did only have 15, wtf kind of bluff is that even w/ 99 or JJ? Not sure if serious but he evilsky most likely meant he was bluffing with his 2nd barell bet, not the ship...

so why not fold to the ship?

On March 26 2012 19:05 player999 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 26 2012 12:47 Joe wrote:   On March 26 2012 10:54 player999 wrote:   On March 26 2012 08:26 EvilSky wrote: ^notsureifserious what? he did only have 15, wtf kind of bluff is that even w/ 99 or JJ? Not sure if serious but he evilsky most likely meant he was bluffing with his 2nd barell bet, not the ship... so why not fold to the ship?

because he had the nuts and only $15 left!

-_-

some serious trolling goin on itt