i dont play these stakes (obv) but doesnt this seem a little thin?

not when you know villain thinks you're way more polarized than you actually are and you are def aware of this fact as hero in this hand is.

On February 06 2012 14:02 TampaBayMat wrote: i dont play these stakes (obv) but doesnt this seem a little thin?

hes only beat here by K7/A7

by "this" i mean not checking back the river (just to clarify)

ok wow. more power to ya man.

i guess the 2 pairing on the river is a pretty good card... and since he checked.. ok yeah. guess i just had to think about it a little

Plus even if you don't have strictly 51%(or whatever it is you need exactly when you account for rake) against his river calling range this is just so awesome hand to show up with in terms ev of the whole match. Bad maniacs are polarized and easy to play against, but a maniac that merges his ranges like this is just a nightmare to face even for the best players I'd imagine

On February 06 2012 14:25 n0rthf4ce wrote: Show nested quote + On February 06 2012 14:02 TampaBayMat wrote: i dont play these stakes (obv) but doesnt this seem a little thin? hes only beat here by K7/A7

who would check back the flop with tptk?

he would glady go for 3 streets of value vs me with K7 here

im valuebetting against A highs and 6x mostly