0
 |
NeillyJQ United States. May 25 2011 12:32. Posts 8947 | | | |
|
| Just remember you need to be god damn sure about their tendencies. -Artanis11 http://www.pocketfives.com/profiles/neillyaa/ | |
|
|
1
| | |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
|
1
 |
Arirang Canada. May 25 2011 13:23. Posts 1673 | | |
I don't like variance so I'd just check/call here. Unless I have a strong read on a player that he likes to turn his hand into a bluff with high frequency on river with missed draws and pairs that are lower than J and higher than 8. |
|
|
1
 |
TheHuHu3 United States. May 25 2011 13:45. Posts 5544 | | |
More like what Tom said and 280 B/F. |
| |
|
|
1
|
DooMeR United States. May 25 2011 13:49. Posts 8546 | | |
c/c is much worse than bet/fold. if we cant bet fold in this spot then ck/f is the best line. as he will have more hands to call with light than bluff himself or VB light |
|
| I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance, by running away from the scene of an accident. | |
|
|
1
 |
Stroggoz New Zealand. May 25 2011 14:01. Posts 5297 | | |
check call is only to be used in this situation if you think you can get more value than b/f. So i guess if a queen is betting whenever you check and missed draws. and possibly underpairs that are now nothing, then yeah c/c is better.
obviously though that's not the case since all the high stakes players are advising bet/fold. |
|
| One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings | |
|
|
1
|
Arirang Canada. May 25 2011 14:08. Posts 1673 | | |
hmm... yeah, okay, I see. Thanks guys. |
|
|
1
 |
GiYoM Korea (South). May 25 2011 14:17. Posts 455 | | |
there are enough draws that missed to justify a check. Also there arent many hands that he can call me with that he doesnt vbet if i check to him. Thats why I like to c/c or check raise with some history.
|
|
|
1
|
Arirang Canada. May 25 2011 14:34. Posts 1673 | | |
Yeah well, I think it depends a lot on the villain. What did you end up doing Giyom, if you don't mind me asking. |
|
|
1
|
lebowski Greece. May 25 2011 15:31. Posts 9205 | | |
| | On May 25 2011 13:17 GiYoM wrote:
there are enough draws that missed to justify a check. Also there arent many hands that he can call me with that he doesnt vbet if i check to him. Thats why I like to c/c or check raise with some history.
|
I wonder what sort of history makes a c/r a good option |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
|
DooMeR United States. May 25 2011 15:51. Posts 8546 | | |
if this guy is a reg i definitely disagree with him having enough draws. if he has made hands and VBs them poorly such as like QT here which imo is terrible VB i guess thats fine. but i wouldnt count on it without some decent history. |
|
| I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance, by running away from the scene of an accident. | |
|
|
1
|
GiYoM Korea (South). May 25 2011 16:15. Posts 455 | | |
I did exactly what talentedtom said i should do.
he folded quickly. |
|
|
|
]
Canada. May 25 2011 12:40. Posts 20070
