PokerStars Game #53348297288: Holdem No Limit ($5/$10 USD) - 2010/11/27 22:16:14 CCT [2010/11/27 9:16:14 ET]
Table Kerstin 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 3: jj_raise ($1015 in chips)
Seat 4: Bruut99 ($1389.50 in chips)
Seat 5: gottama ($400 in chips)
Seat 6: wobbly_au ($1000 in chips)
jj_raise: posts small blind $5
Bruut99: posts big blind $10
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to wobbly_au 
gottama: folds
wobbly_au: raises $20 to $30
jj_raise: calls $25
Bruut99: folds
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $70.00)
jj_raise: checks
wobbly_au: bets $50
jj_raise: raises $90 to $140
wobbly_au: calls $90
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $350.00)
jj_raise: bets $245
wobbly_au: calls $245
River (Pot : $840.00)
jj_raise: bets $600 and is all-in
wobbly_au said, "lawl?"
wobbly_au: calls $585 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($15) returned to jj_raise
Showdown
jj_raise: shows 
(two pair, Fives and Deuces)
wobbly_au: shows (two pair, Jacks and Fives)
wobbly_au collected $2008 from pot
Summary
Total pot $2010 | Rake $2
Board
Seat 3: jj_raise (small blind) showed and lost with two pair, Fives and Deuces
Seat 4: Bruut99 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: gottama folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: wobbly_au (button) showed and won ($2008) with two pair, Jacks and Fives
1
 |
wobbly_au Australia. Nov 27 2010 09:20. Posts 6540 | | |
thought process on river was.
is he dumb enough to bluff this river? |
| |
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Nov 27 2010 09:24. Posts 15163 | | |
Are you more likely to call on Kx Qx here? |
| |
|
|
4
 |
Baalim Mexico. Nov 27 2010 09:46. Posts 34246 | | |
| | On November 27 2010 08:24 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
Are you more likely to call on Kx Qx here? |
wat? |
|
| Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
 |
bigredhoss Cook Islands. Nov 27 2010 09:51. Posts 8648 | | |
| | On November 27 2010 08:24 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
Are you more likely to call on Kx Qx here? |
that's some sick fps you got goin on |
| |
|
|
1
|
wobbly_au Australia. Nov 27 2010 09:55. Posts 6540 | | |
i thought about responding with a what to ur quesiton lemon.. then i thought it was rude so i didnt do it.. but baal said it so i'll say it again.
wat?? |
| |
|
|
1
| |
what i think he meant (guessing here) is if river was a K or Q, which would you be more likely to call. or smth.. (assuming villain shoves) |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Nov 27 2010 10:11. Posts 15163 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
|
qwerty67890 New Zealand. Nov 27 2010 10:12. Posts 14026 | | |
i lol'd at this
wobbly_au said, "lawl?"
wobbly_au: calls $585 and is all-in
once again, i fail to see where all the wobbly hate comes from |
|
|
4
|
Baalim Mexico. Nov 27 2010 10:12. Posts 34246 | | |
no, a K or Q would be a much worse river than 5 since worse jack now beat us and overcards+fd drew on us too.
2-5 are very good turn and rivers since it makes sets less likely |
|
| Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | Last edit: 27/11/2010 10:13 |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Nov 27 2010 10:16. Posts 15163 | | |
Wobbly's thought process was 'is he dumb enough to bluff this river?' If the answer would no then that would imply he is more likely to bluff on scarecards amirite? |
| |
|
|
1
|
edzwoo United States. Nov 27 2010 10:16. Posts 5911 | | |
And the 5 kills the combos of one of the few hands he reps. |
|
|
1
|
edzwoo United States. Nov 27 2010 10:18. Posts 5911 | | |
| | On November 27 2010 09:16 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
Wobbly's thought process was 'is he dumb enough to bluff this river?' If the answer would no then that would imply he is more likely to bluff on scarecards amirite? |
He said that because the guy reps nothing. |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Nov 27 2010 10:39. Posts 15163 | | |
You benders, how am I supposed to know he was being funny.
This is serious business |
| |
|
|
|
