Full Tilt Poker Game #18538540366: Table Afterburner (6 max) - $0.50/$1 - No Limit Hold'em - 10:42:50 ET - 2010/02/17
Seat 1: Night2o11 ($378.75)
Seat 2: saymond ($131.20)
Seat 3: BlueCobalt ($177)
Seat 4: ALFeRICH ($121.30)
Seat 5: Megaheiner ($146.95)
Seat 6: mestreech31 ($103.25)
saymond posts the small blind of $0.50
BlueCobalt posts the big blind of $1
The button is in seat #1
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Night2o11
ALFeRICH folds
Megaheiner folds
mestreech31 raises to $3
Night2o11 has 15 seconds left to act
Night2o11 calls $3
saymond folds
BlueCobalt folds
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $7.50)
mestreech31 bets $5
Night2o11 has 15 seconds left to act
Night2o11 has requested TIME
Night2o11 raises to $17
mestreech31 calls $12
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $41.50)
mestreech31 checks
Night2o11 bets $26
mestreech31 calls $26
River (Pot : $93.50)
mestreech31 checks
Night2o11 has 15 seconds left to act
Night2o11 has requested TIME
Night2o11 bets $332.75, and is all in
mestreech31 calls $57.25, and is all in
Uncalled bet of $275.50 returned to Night2o11
Showdown
Night2o11 shows two pair, Queens and Jacks
mestreech31 shows
a straight, Queen high
mestreech31 wins the pot ($205) with a straight, Queen high
Summary
Total pot $208 | Rake $3
Board:
Seat 1: Night2o11 (button) showed and lost with two pair, Queens and Jacks
Seat 2: saymond (small blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 3: BlueCobalt (big blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 4: ALFeRICH didn't bet (folded)
Seat 5: Megaheiner didn't bet (folded)
Seat 6: mestreech31 showed and won ($205) with a straight, Queen high
1
| |
UNREAL!!! there is no justice! |
|
|
1
 |
Sicks Macks United States. Feb 17 2010 10:47. Posts 3929 | | |
I would check this behind, not because I don't think you're ahead enough, but he's probably folding J9s etc there. |
| |
|
|
1
| |
Check??? DO YOU HAVE NO HONOR???
I should put in a calling range in poker stove |
|
|
1
| |
BUTCHERED
im not in love with your bet sizing.. Boh |
|
|
1
 |
Spitfiree Bulgaria. Feb 17 2010 10:58. Posts 9634 | | |
| | On February 17 2010 09:47 Sicks Macks wrote:
I would check this behind, not because I don't think you're ahead enough, but he's probably folding J9s etc there. |
i wonder how you can say this without any info for the guy |
|
|
1
| |
i wonder tough how night2o11 always gets so many responses...
|
|
|
1
|
SakiSaki  Sweden. Feb 17 2010 11:01. Posts 9685 | | |
played fine, obv river shove |
|
| what wackass site is this nigga? | |
|
|
1
| |
| | On February 17 2010 10:01 SakiSaki wrote:
played fine, obv river shove |
thanks sakisaki |
|
|
1
|
EvilSky Czech Republic. Feb 17 2010 11:06. Posts 8915 | | |
I think with more left behind this might be a check but with so little hes gonna have a hard time getting away from worse hands, id bet the turn a bit bigger tho. |
|
|
1
| |
| | On February 17 2010 10:06 EvilSky wrote:
I think with more left behind this might be a check but with so little hes gonna have a hard time getting away from worse hands, id bet the turn a bit bigger tho. |
this!
|
|
|
1
| |
u don't think betting turn smallish is great because it keeps his calling range the large on turn and therefore onto the river as well when I shove for just 2/3rd pot or w/e |
|
|
1
|
lebowski Greece. Feb 17 2010 11:22. Posts 9205 | | |
dude he's clearly not folding J10o on the turn so bet hard |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
|
Sicks Macks United States. Feb 17 2010 11:23. Posts 3929 | | |
What's night's range on the flop?
T's, 2p+, straights, maybe an odd bluff
What's night's range on the turn?
T's, 2p+, straights?
What's night's range on the river?
ALL VALUE
Unless he's a fish he's folding QJ- here. I would like the shove more if a fd bricked or something. |
|
| Mr. Will Throwit | Last edit: 17/02/2010 11:25 |
|
|
1
|
EvilSky Czech Republic. Feb 17 2010 11:27. Posts 8915 | | |
I dont think its a big deal, but you can squeeze a bit more like 28-30 I dont think it changes his calling range at all and on the river we actually give him exactly 3:1, like I said tho this is fine too. |
|
|
1
| |
oic
villain doesn't know that sicks macks, and can easily be hero'ing with QK+
or well QT+ as u can see |
|
| | Last edit: 17/02/2010 11:31 |
|
|
1
 |
CrownRoyal United States. Feb 17 2010 11:39. Posts 11385 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
|
Sicks Macks United States. Feb 17 2010 11:39. Posts 3929 | | |
| | On February 17 2010 10:31 Night2o1 wrote:
oic
villain doesn't know that sicks macks, and can easily be hero'ing with QK+
or well QT+ as u can see |
nah, I think when he's calling down with QT it's because of the oesd, not the pair. |
| |
|
|
1
| |
mmm could be
wtf nit nothin'! |
|
|
1
| |
| | On February 17 2010 10:39 Sicks Macks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 17 2010 10:31 Night2o1 wrote:
oic
villain doesn't know that sicks macks, and can easily be hero'ing with QK+
or well QT+ as u can see |
nah, I think when he's calling down with QT it's because of the oesd, not the pair.
|
its both? |
|
|
1
|
SPEWTARD Peru. Feb 17 2010 11:57. Posts 4306 | | |
lol wtf r u talkin people, its obv a c/behind, u wont get paid for anything except a T lol, QT JT 9T TT slowplayed KT i hate shovin the river with him havin half stack behind |
|
| Rise and Shine | Last edit: 17/02/2010 11:58 |
|
|
1
|
SakiSaki Sweden. Feb 17 2010 12:00. Posts 9685 | | |
Its a huge misstake to assume that your opponent will play perfectly against you |
|
| what wackass site is this nigga? | |
|
|
1
|
EvilSky Czech Republic. Feb 17 2010 12:27. Posts 8915 | | |
| | On February 17 2010 11:00 SakiSaki wrote:
Its a huge misstake to assume that your opponent will play perfectly against you |
This, if you assume your opponents arent gonna make mistakes there is no money to be won in poker |
|
|
|
