1
 |
nolan Ireland. Jun 03 2007 05:21. Posts 6205 | | | |
|
| On September 08 2008 10:07 Baal wrote: my head is a gyroscope, your argument is invalid | |
|
|
4
 |
PoorUser  United States. Jun 03 2007 05:25. Posts 7471 | | |
hes taking lessons from donald |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Sean.G Norway. Jun 03 2007 05:30. Posts 238 | | | |
|
| Poker is quiet war; it is tidy bloodlust; it is ripping the guts out of the guy next to you and tossing them back in his face with a pair of aces. | |
|
|
1
|
Sean.G Norway. Jun 03 2007 05:39. Posts 238 | | |
If he would've limp-called my preflop raise, should I have played it any differently? possible straight out there, so I could minimize an eventual loss by checking/calling turn instead of facing a raise or something.. also my check could've induced a bet from him, and then I could check/check raise the river if I hit a full house
Or am I just being plain stupid?  |
|
| Poker is quiet war; it is tidy bloodlust; it is ripping the guts out of the guy next to you and tossing them back in his face with a pair of aces. | |
|
|
1
 |
nicksson Sweden. Jun 03 2007 05:51. Posts 4662 | | |
yes, and you cant even check raise river |
|
|
1
| |
you need to try to get this to the felt all day. And why check behind turn for pot control if you are going to raise river!?! |
|
|
1
|
Sean.G Norway. Jun 03 2007 07:53. Posts 238 | | |
hm ok, but how come I can't check raise river? I'm saying IF I would've hit the full house. otherwise I'd just check. but ok, I think I get the picture, that I'd maximize my winnings by betting turn as well.
|
|
| Poker is quiet war; it is tidy bloodlust; it is ripping the guts out of the guy next to you and tossing them back in his face with a pair of aces. | |
|
|
|
