PokerStars Game #8914025935: Hold'em No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2007/03/15 - 13:32:58 (ET)
Table 'Leda III' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: Stu_yo ($19.45 in chips)
Seat 2: asdf2000 ($50 in chips)
Seat 3: moink ($86.70 in chips)
Seat 5: zydes ($51.80 in chips)
Seat 6: Sescho ($9 in chips)
Seat 7: Minopli ($15.95 in chips)
Seat 8: charli155 ($22.65 in chips)
Seat 9: Brasil2007 ($50.90 in chips)
Stu_yo: posts small blind $0.25
asdf2000: posts big blind $0.50
Holecards
Dealt to asdf2000 
moink: folds
zydes: folds
Sescho: folds
Minopli: calls $0.50
charli155: calls $0.50
Brasil2007: folds
Stu_yo: calls $0.25
asdf2000: checks
Flop (Pot : $2)
Stu_yo: checks
asdf2000: bets $2
Minopli: folds
charli155: folds
Stu_yo: raises $4 to $6
asdf2000: raises $43.50 to $49.50 and is all-in
Stu_yo: calls $12.95 and is all-in
Turn (Pot : $101)
River (Pot : $101)
zydes is disconnected
Showdown
Stu_yo: shows 
(a flush, Nine high)
asdf2000: mucks hand
Stu_yo collected $37.95 from pot
zydes is connected
Summary
Total pot $39.90 | Rake $1.95
Board
Seat 1: Stu_yo (small blind) showed and won ($37.95) with a flush, Nine high
Seat 2: asdf2000 (big blind) mucked
Seat 3: moink folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: zydes folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: Sescho folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: Minopli folded on the Flop
Seat 8: charli155 folded on the Flop
Seat 9: Brasil2007 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
1
 |
asdf2000 United States. Mar 15 2007 11:36. Posts 7690 | | |
he wore his entire clock down and then apparently decided that calling would be +EV |
|
| Grindin so hard, Im smashin pussies left and right. | |
|
|
1
 |
Floofy Canada. Mar 15 2007 11:42. Posts 8708 | | |
calling is actually +EV against your hand |
|
| james9994: make note dont play against floofy, ;( | |
|
|
1
|
lucifer Sweden. Mar 15 2007 11:45. Posts 5955 | | |
ur saying its +ev against everything but set floof?
and correct if im wrong but isn't it call $13 to win $28?
and thats not 3:1? and therefore not +ev? |
|
| On February 19 2009 22:21 Confedrate wrote: i dont get it | Last edit: 15/03/2007 11:48 |
|
|
1
|
FrinkX United States. Mar 15 2007 11:48. Posts 7561 | | |
im sure he knew what travis had |
|
| bitch on a pension suck my dong | |
|
|
1
|
lucifer Sweden. Mar 15 2007 11:50. Posts 5955 | | |
he said hand, not range....
and it's unraised and travis ain't retard. so yeah. bottom 2. top2. other 2. and sets.
don't see how it's +ev.
maybe I got some serious calculation errors. |
|
| On February 19 2009 22:21 Confedrate wrote: i dont get it | |
|
|
1
|
Floofy Canada. Mar 15 2007 11:53. Posts 8708 | | |
he has 35% against 49. so its +EV
He have no idea travis is a good player and its probably -ev against him, but i would say against a random 25nl player his call aint so bad |
|
| james9994: make note dont play against floofy, ;( | |
|
|
1
|
Floofy Canada. Mar 15 2007 11:54. Posts 8708 | | |
2 times he loose 13 bux, 1 time he win 26$
ez own |
|
| james9994: make note dont play against floofy, ;( | |
|
|
1
 |
T8Suited Canada. Mar 15 2007 11:56. Posts 1276 | | |
| | On March 15 2007 10:45 lucifer wrote:
ur saying its +ev against everything but set floof?
and correct if im wrong but isn't it call $13 to win $28?
and thats not 3:1? and therefore not +ev? |
I think it's call $13 to win $40 (disregarding rake), which means he has to be better than 32.5% dog for it to be profitable (which he is). |
|
|
1
|
lucifer Sweden. Mar 15 2007 12:01. Posts 5955 | | |
| | On March 15 2007 10:54 Floofy wrote:
2 times he loose 13 bux, 1 time he win 26$
ez own |
ok. so against random fish it's +ev. but against people with brain it's -ev. |
|
| On February 19 2009 22:21 Confedrate wrote: i dont get it | |
|
|
1
|
asdf2000 United States. Mar 15 2007 12:20. Posts 7690 | | |
| | On March 15 2007 10:56 T8Suited wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 15 2007 10:45 lucifer wrote:
ur saying its +ev against everything but set floof?
and correct if im wrong but isn't it call $13 to win $28?
and thats not 3:1? and therefore not +ev? |
I think it's call $13 to win $40 (disregarding rake), which means he has to be better than 32.5% dog for it to be profitable (which he is).
|
he was calling 13 to win 25. |
|
| Grindin so hard, Im smashin pussies left and right. | |
|
|
|
