Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1009776
Submitted by : Stroggoz
PokerStars Hand #98271694628: Holdem No Limit ($2/$4 USD) - 2013/05/08 6:21:39 ET
Table Demophon II 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: Stroggos_nz ($435.50 in chips)
Seat 3: Vitcin ($376.21 in chips)
Seat 4: pindrokk ($402 in chips)
Seat 5: tariko13 ($156 in chips)
Seat 6: gordon0410 ($160 in chips)
tariko13: posts small blind $2
gordon0410: posts big blind $4
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Stroggos_nz  
Stroggos_nz: raises $8 to $12
Vitcin: raises $8 to $20
pindrokk: folds
tariko13: folds
gordon0410: folds
mycentury leaves the table
Stroggos_nz: raises $32 to $52
Vitcin: raises $32 to $84
Stroggos_nz: calls $32
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $174.00)
  
Stroggos_nz: checks
RiverraiseAI joins the table at seat #2
Vitcin: bets $212
Stroggos_nz: raises $139.50 to $351.50 and is all-in
Vitcin: calls $80.21 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($59.29) returned to Stroggos_nz
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $758.42)
River (Pot : $758.42)
Showdown
Stroggos_nz: shows (a pair of Aces)
Vitcin: shows   (three of a kind, Kings)
Vitcin collected $755.62 from pot
Summary
Total pot $758.42 | Rake $2.80
Board
Seat 1: Stroggos_nz showed and lost with a pair of Aces
Seat 3: Vitcin showed and won ($755.62) with three of a kind, Kings
Seat 4: pindrokk (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: tariko13 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: gordon0410 (big blind) folded before Flop
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
longple  Sweden. May 08 2013 07:43. Posts 4472 | | | |
|
| 1 | | |
|
| Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light not our darkness that most frightens us and as we let our own lights shine we unconsciously give other people permision to do the same | |
|
| 1 | |
interesting line, i dont expect KK to overbet here 
 |
| |
|
| 1
 |
Trav94 Canada. May 08 2013 19:09. Posts 1785 | | |
Just wondering, why wouldn't you want to get it in pre? |
|
| 1
 |
Stroggoz New Zealand. May 08 2013 19:14. Posts 5296 | | |
| | On May 08 2013 18:09 Trav94 wrote:
Just wondering, why wouldn't you want to get it in pre? |
if they are bluffing i want to call and let them hit a pair or a draw and get it in. If they have Qq/kk im stacking them postflop anyway. |
|
| One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings | |
|
| 1
|
Trav94 Canada. May 08 2013 19:17. Posts 1785 | | |
| | On May 08 2013 18:14 Stroggoz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 08 2013 18:09 Trav94 wrote:
Just wondering, why wouldn't you want to get it in pre? |
if they are bluffing i want to call and let them hit a pair or a draw and get it in. If they have Qq/kk im stacking them postflop anyway.
|
ahh ok, makes sense, it's just at micros if it get's past 4betting and you have AA, the villain has QQ+ or AK almost every time, and sometimes but not usually TT/JJ/AQ |
|
| 1
 |
Pb Greece. May 09 2013 07:43. Posts 98 | | |
Unless they have ak and miss or qq/kk and flop comes A x x in which case they may fold at some point. Your argument goes both ways. |
|
| |
|
