1
|
Mariuslol   Norway. Jan 26 2010 09:54. Posts 4742 | | |
I'm always up for new things when it comes to poker. So thought I'd give this a try =] (At least a couple of sessions and see how it feels.)
The idea is that after every session, I have to look at these rules, and evaluate how well I did on each point. I think I'll rate with 1,0 - 10,0 where:
1,0 - 3,0 = Really bad, tilting, spewing, not stopping, everything horrible you can think of.
3,1 - 5,0 = Low end is pretty bad, spewy, a little tilty, unfocused, and to top range is autopilot, doing other stuff, not paying attention just klicking.
5,1 - 7,0 = Average bad reg is at low end, just doing ok'ish things, not getting stellar reads doing anything special, top end is making good notes, trying to catch myself each time i lose focus and refocus, not doing other stuff while playing, trying to be aware all the time so forth.
7,1 - 10,0 = From playing really well to playing your absolute A+ Game, edge of your seat, noticing tendencies, valuebetting like a god, being in "The Zone" playing the best I can with the skills I have.
The rules
* How well you played overall
* Quality of your thinking
* Quality of decisions
* Number and size of Mistakes
* Quality of focus ("The Zone", autopilot, distractions, boredom.)
* Length of the time spent focused and playing well
* Length of the session
* Ability to manage emotions, focus and thinking
* Ability to work through a tough mental or emotional spot.
I know that some of these you can't really rate, but I'll rate the one I can. =]
Oh well, fun food for though nonetheless.
|
|
| 1
|
beastmode   United States. Jan 26 2010 20:38. Posts 37 | | |
lemme know if it works haha, i always jsut get pissed or happy after a session and move on |
|
| 1
|
beastmode   United States. Jan 26 2010 20:38. Posts 37 | | |
lemme know if it works haha, i always jsut get pissed or happy after a session and move on |
|
| 1
|
Mariuslol   Norway. Jan 27 2010 07:06. Posts 4742 | | |
It's interessting, I have it written on a sheet of paper with big letters. And after each session, I look at them, then whisper a number I feel is aduqate. So I can get a general feel for how I think I was playing.
Don't want to make too big of a deal with it, spend time writing, thinking analyzing, spend enough time studying and revewing hands here and there. Playing at the table is most important. |
|
| |
|