i feel stars giving out shitty vpp rates for micro/lowstakes fr players are having a negative effect on the games lately. i have played a lot of tables wehre people are just so super super tight thus giving vpps shit value. i used to get .20 per hand 50nl and around .10 at 25nl, now its like .12 for 50 and .08 for 25nl which is ridiculous. benefits will only be felt after a fucking year of playing this shit lol. i hope i can find another site to play at but all this shadiness in online sites is kinda risky.
that or switch to 6max or god forbid....PLOL haha
check out this jap 60's horror classic, great horror flic even now
0 votes
Last edit: 18/01/2010 07:06
1
Elite00 United States. Jan 18 2010 00:38. Posts 683
6max has it better, and rightfully so since you get a lot less free hands and obv pay more rake. it makes more sense to play 25nlfr than 50nl for vpps tho. risk half to get slightly 25% less vpps.
nah man for anything below 200nl FR it sucks. its waaay below what fr low/micro used to have, 50nl and 100nl suffered the most, unlike what stars claims that the difference is very small.
just because of all this im thinking of just banking at 25nl and skipping 50nl, the .04 difference bet them is just too small, and the games are waaaay easier to beat at 25nl. and just go play 100nl when i raise enough money for it.
Contact Users: 563 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 18:19
Sweden. Jan 18 2010 02:23. Posts 4472
,
,
,
,