if you're gonna scam people at least be smarter than this (note pokerstars HH + date):
Submitted by :
if you add tons of macro options and units and keep the old obligations like sending scvs to mine, pros will just focus less on micro which sucks imo -Floofy
1
CT_rider United States. Mar 10 2009 14:30. Posts 134
On March 10 2009 11:43 Subaru wrote:
where do u live in CT?
New haven area
1
CT_rider United States. Mar 10 2009 14:36. Posts 134
On March 10 2009 12:58 FoolsPlay wrote:
if you're gonna scam people at least be smarter than this (note pokerstars HH + date):
Submitted by :
??.......I just copied and pasted from Poker tracker the game#??? dont know what ur talking about and Im not trying to scam ne1
you posted 8 fake pokerstars hand histories (they're either made up or extremely old - note the HH #'s; either way they are unable to be requested from pokerstars) yet the date on the hand histories makes it seem like you played them this week (except this one which you played in the future ROFL: http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/650429).
edit: why would you post these fake hand histories at any rate
if you add tons of macro options and units and keep the old obligations like sending scvs to mine, pros will just focus less on micro which sucks imo -Floofy
ya i misread that, but he still sounds pretty fucking sketchy
if you add tons of macro options and units and keep the old obligations like sending scvs to mine, pros will just focus less on micro which sucks imo -Floofy
1
Zalfor United States. Mar 10 2009 16:27. Posts 2236
its kind of interesting that he wants to stake other people.
why would anyone take his stake unless they're going to spew it out.
1
the cleaner Germany. Mar 10 2009 17:53. Posts 3014
lol, so weird that some of your opponents in the hand histories you posted haven't appeared on pokertableratings.com for the past 30 days.
Contact Users: 426 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 23:03
Sweden. Mar 10 2009 12:02. Posts 9687
,
,
,
,
,
,
,