shit doesn't end

Been beat everytime I do this, this is still correct vs 99% of opponents right?
+ Show Spoiler +

Honestly I see mostly horrendous beats looking at my other losing hands today. These are the least cooler/beat like ones I see. Just making sure I'm valuing TP correctly I guess.

0 votes

Same shit is happening to me dude, fuck the the year.

both hands played fine

On January 05 2009 23:14 palak wrote: both hands played fine

thank ya

looks fine

both hands u were lucky they didnt reraise.

yea these are ok.

wtf@dude flatting the 777

these games are like 99% fish u need to remember that so a lot of situations are going to play out differently than hands u see posted at higher stakes in games with more/better regs actually using huds/reads

how are you graphing your cake stuff? just converting the stars hh and then running them through HEM?
also I made the switch from stars to cake after i ran bad for a while cause of all the supposed fish at cake, turns out i ran much worse there due to less stats and very ugly interface that tilted me.
i just short stacked the rest of my bonus there instead so maybe something for you to think about, although nl10 regs at stars are fucking nits.
i switched to cake nl20 btw and broke even for a long ass time before i stopped playing.

gotta just not be noob without a hud.

there is like no light 3betting compared to other sites which makes the games so much more profitable imo cause

1. playing more pots postflop with less variance.

2. you can do it yourself and people adjust TERRIBLY

Just ride it out mr, plus improve, I'm always more motivated to improve during downswings/breakeven stretches

thanks barbie


Ya I just convert -> import from folder in HEM

I think cake is definitely beatable, even though there are a lot of reggish multitablers they seem to be a notch below their stars and FTP counterparts.

My bud Sennpu helped me out a ton with a rail this evening and I am just going to try to integrate his stuff into my game. I basically just sat back and seemed to be really weak-tight. I didn't bluff or anything at all. The problem is I felt like I ran pretty good, especially compared to the past day or two, and I am not sure if it is really sustainable.. Obviously Sennpu plays higher stakes and I trust his advice but .. iunno! I'll try to replicate this style tomorrow by myself. Also shout out to muhweli who I talked to on msn, and the occasional thought Sennpu gets from Fayth on my behalf.

I'm basically trying to redo my game totally. I ran at 18/16 during the rail session.

This is basically the session he railed me for.
I lost in non-showdown at a much lower rate than usual which is pretty important imo, showing that I am definitely not usually choosing my spots as well. Another strike against bluffing here.

very standard, wp in both hands you just got unlucky.

The QQ hand is player very nice sir !
I like.

The AQ is fine till river.
However i am not sure if i like that big of a river bet

Which hands do u think would u beat ?
KQ is basically the only realistic hand that will call
All missed draws will fold anyways
However if u bet 50% pot instead of 62% he might even snapcall with TT or 99 QT etc...

basically Hand 1 is played very good and Hand 2 is also played okay , allthough i would only bet 50% pot on river there

well maybe u just run liek shit
I did this , too for ~ 40 K hands

Its so annoying .. like everybody tells u that u do all wrong without looking at your hands since u have bad results at low stakes ... while u actually play decent and just run bad
Then one day u dont run bad anymore and u suddenly beat Nl100 for 10BB/100 the next 10K hands ?

Variance in Poker is so mighty and its hard for erverybody who is on the bad side oft it ...

However it will turn around some day !

might take 1 week , might take 2 months ... but in the end u will win big

<3