1
 |
djforever   Canada. Dec 09 2008 17:22. Posts 1510 | | |
|
| Last edit: 11/10/2018 04:28 |
|
|
1
 |
Tycho   Netherlands. Dec 09 2008 17:25. Posts 1553 | | |
are there that many fish playing razz or are you just really good at it?
why did you ever start to study razz? |
|
|
|
1
 |
CrownRoyal   United States. Dec 09 2008 17:37. Posts 11386 | | |
i didnt realize you could actually have an edge like that in razz
are there srsly that many fish? |
|
|
|
1
 |
djforever   Canada. Dec 09 2008 17:40. Posts 1510 | | |
| On December 09 2008 16:37 CrownRoyal wrote:
i didnt realize you could actually have an edge like that in razz
are there srsly that many fish? |
yes |
|
| Last edit: 09/12/2008 17:42 |
|
|
1
 |
djforever   Canada. Dec 09 2008 17:41. Posts 1510 | | |
| On December 09 2008 16:25 Tycho wrote:
why did you ever start to study razz? |
i like money =) |
|
|
1
 |
Sicks Macks   United States. Dec 09 2008 17:45. Posts 3929 | | |
I envy you, I really like stud games, but I can't play more than 3 tables without forgetting dead cards. |
|
Mr. Will Throwit | Last edit: 09/12/2008 17:49 |
|
|
1
 |
moneypoker   Poland. Dec 09 2008 18:09. Posts 693 | | |
is 1PTBB/100 a good result in limit games? |
|
you win some, you lose some... | |
|
|
1
 |
djforever   Canada. Dec 09 2008 18:17. Posts 1510 | | |
| On December 09 2008 17:09 moneypoker wrote:
is 1PTBB/100 a good result in limit games? |
to be honest i have no clue whats considered a good result. im just happy that im winning. |
|
|
1
 |
moneypoker   Poland. Dec 09 2008 18:27. Posts 693 | | |
whats a good bankroll for razz? 500BB? |
|
you win some, you lose some... | |
|
|
1
 |
djforever   Canada. Dec 09 2008 18:28. Posts 1510 | | |
| On December 09 2008 17:27 moneypoker wrote:
whats a good bankroll for razz? 500BB? |
id say 300bb+ |
|
|
1
 |
shaneomac   United States. Dec 09 2008 18:34. Posts 4245 | | |
| On December 09 2008 17:28 djforever wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2008 17:27 moneypoker wrote:
whats a good bankroll for razz? 500BB? |
id say 300bb+
|
depends on ur game. ironically enough, the 3/6-10/20 games on stars/ftp are much tougher than the 30/60 games. honestly as wierd as this sounds 300+BB for higher stakes and like 500 or so for lower to midstakes |
|
|
1
 |
djforever   Canada. Dec 09 2008 18:37. Posts 1510 | | |
| On December 09 2008 17:34 shaneomac wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 09 2008 17:28 djforever wrote:
| On December 09 2008 17:27 moneypoker wrote:
whats a good bankroll for razz? 500BB? |
id say 300bb+
|
depends on ur game. ironically enough, the 3/6-10/20 games on stars/ftp are much tougher than the 30/60 games. honestly as wierd as this sounds 300+BB for higher stakes and like 500 or so for lower to midstakes |
yeah but you realize they are tougher because their structure dictates that a tighter game is more optimal, as opposed to the structure of the higher limits that encourages steals and loose play. if the lower limits had a structure similar to the higher limits, it would change the game flow a lot.
edit: then youd see that the players are not better at lower limits, but just play tighter. |
|
| Last edit: 09/12/2008 18:39 |
|
|
1
 |
shaneomac   United States. Dec 09 2008 18:53. Posts 4245 | | |
yeah there is definitely a different flow. i am going by what other razz players have told me when i played it, and by what wired has told me. i used his method from what he taught me and i never won a single dollar @ razz. i do not believe it was cuz i sucked, maybe i was just playing too loose for those games, or ran bad, idk, but ive heard from a bunch of different ppl that the higher stakes are easier than the midstakes.
this is a stupid debate obv, all i was advocating from experience is to use more than 300BBs if hes going to try to break into the 3/6-5/10 games to begin with |
|
|
1
 |
djforever   Canada. Dec 09 2008 19:04. Posts 1510 | | |
| On December 09 2008 17:53 shaneomac wrote:
yeah there is definitely a different flow. i am going by what other razz players have told me when i played it, and by what wired has told me. i used his method from what he taught me and i never won a single dollar @ razz. i do not believe it was cuz i sucked, maybe i was just playing too loose for those games, or ran bad, idk, but ive heard from a bunch of different ppl that the higher stakes are easier than the midstakes.
this is a stupid debate obv, all i was advocating from experience is to use more than 300BBs if hes going to try to break into the 3/6-5/10 games to begin with |
its not really a debate. they are all legitamite points. and we both know wired is the nuts when it comes to razz. and yeah thats prob true, i dont know ive never actually grinded the low limits for razz so i guess i have no say =(. |
|
| Last edit: 09/12/2008 19:08 |
|
|
1
 |
shaneomac   United States. Dec 09 2008 19:08. Posts 4245 | | |
and likewise ive never played the high stakes . i think i couldve beat the higher stakes had i gotten a chance. still tilted i couldnt beat those faggots that play razz |
|
|
1
 |
djforever   Canada. Dec 09 2008 19:18. Posts 1510 | | |
| On December 09 2008 18:08 shaneomac wrote:
and likewise ive never played the high stakes . i think i couldve beat the higher stakes had i gotten a chance. still tilted i couldnt beat those faggots that play razz |
you can always start =)
edit: again... |
|
| Last edit: 09/12/2008 19:18 |
|
|
1
 |
shaneomac   United States. Dec 09 2008 19:23. Posts 4245 | | |
haha i need to just focus on one thing, and if ima play razz, i would wanna come in playing the 10/20 games and higher. right now, i am trying to beat NL100 FR and once i get to NL200 ima integrate 6m in and try to become a better coach and hopefully find a coach to mentor me. i wish i could play razz the game is so ez imo. lol @ again...
do u ever play nlhe nemore? |
|
|
1
 |
nlloser60   . Dec 15 2008 13:08. Posts 304 | | |
| [B]
do u ever play nlhe nemore? |
yeah, good question  |
|
|
|