How bad can you run - Page 2

green line riding is fun

more interesting is Large Downswing Probability

I don't even wanna know x.x

On June 09 2010 16:17 tomson wrote: After googling a standard deviation of 80bb/100 for 6max seems reasonable, but can some of you guys check your databases to make sure we have a good estimate here?

mine is at 114 over 550k hands

On June 09 2010 17:49 edzwoo wrote:

yeah u can run pretty bad, i'd rather not think about it and just keep playing tho

980k hands 100nl (6max)
std deviation bb 97.25

you can filter to only show min/max

how do we figure out our standard deviation?

^hem

variance, it happens.

On June 09 2010 18:36 Baal wrote: how do we figure out our standard deviation?

If you mean in PT3 it is under the session tab -> session details.

On June 09 2010 16:17 tomson wrote: After googling a standard deviation of 80bb/100 for 6max seems reasonable, but can some of you guys check your databases to make sure we have a good estimate here?

Mine is 84bb/100 (42.27 BB/100). This is for 6 max but only for 270k hands as that's all I have in PT3 atm. I guess it's kind of irrelevant as your own SD is the only one that matters.

Edit: Doesn't help when you divide BB by 2 instead of multiply.

Any sdev from 60-80 is about right, I think.

my stdev in big blinds/100 this year is 145, that about normal compared to u guys?

http://www.liquidpoker.net/poker-forum/470691/Your_variance_(pokertracker_stats).html

+ Show Spoiler +

Surprisingly accurate for mine. The expected shows about 12.5k bb, my graph shows 12.7k bb

i can run VERY bad
i dont need a program to tell me what!

is one big bet = one big blind or = two big blinds?

On June 10 2010 05:11 Royal_Rumble wrote: is one big bet = one big blind or = two big blinds?

Two, coming from fixed limit terminology.