Online Poker Study - All players are welcome - Page 3

What pissed me off is that we are some donk who sits in with 60bbs and open limps the button ahrgghhhh

I filled it in entirely.
Would very much like it if you post the results of your research in this forum when you are done.

On February 05 2010 05:51 gororokgororok wrote: I filled it in entirely. Would very much like it if you post the results of your research in this forum when you are done.

Done

On February 05 2010 04:13 EvilSky wrote: What pissed me off is that we are some donk who sits in with 60bbs and open limps the button ahrgghhhh

rofl

On February 05 2010 05:51 gororokgororok wrote: I filled it in entirely. Would very much like it if you post the results of your research in this forum when you are done.

On February 05 2010 04:13 EvilSky wrote: What pissed me off is that we are some donk who sits in with 60bbs and open limps the button ahrgghhhh

exactly

I shipped the tens in because we were 70bb's deep . Is that bad?

Anyway, I finished it. I also just calculated the most EV in some points but when the money got bigger I leaned more towards taking the sure money. Like with the $3000 and the 80% $4000. I'm pretty sure I would still gambool but the money starts getting significant so I'd be glad with a sure $3000 as well. Even if it's the -EV option.

Those questions about if you would take the sure money is definitely what the 'sure' money means to you though. Like with the dice toss ($5 if you hit 1-5, $30 if you hit 6) every decent pokerplaying long-term winner would take the 6 no doubt. While some single mom on well-fare who can use $5 to buy food for 2 days would probably take the $5. If I had to choose between 600K$ for sure or 75% to win 1000K$ I'd probably pick the 600K$.

On February 05 2010 05:51 gororokgororok wrote: I filled it in entirely. Would very much like it if you post the results of your research and your tits in this forum when you are done.

Twisted sick nit !

On February 04 2010 22:08 bigbb33 wrote: Wouldn't any biased sample group make any conclusions worthless? Even with respect to just decision making, the data you are getting is from a non-random sample.

sample is sample is sample

On February 04 2010 21:00 UOPokerStudy wrote: Hi everyone, my name is Mindy Morgan. ... ... ... Melinda

ummmmmmmmm

done

On February 05 2010 11:58 Night[Mare] wrote: Show nested quote + On February 04 2010 21:00 UOPokerStudy wrote: Hi everyone, my name is Mindy Morgan. ... ... ... Melinda ummmmmmmmm

maybe they call her mindy

It's funny how my poker side came through on some questions, and my life nit investor side came through on others. When it came to the guaranteed money, I almost always took that.

On February 06 2010 18:01 superfashion wrote: It's funny how my poker side came through on some questions, and my life nit investor side came through on others. When it came to the guaranteed money, I almost always took that.

i go for the most EV always
dont understand why you guys would not

On February 04 2010 23:00 exalted wrote: "3. In a game of chance, which option would you choose? OPTION A: A 25% chance of losing $6,000 OPTION B: A 25% of losing $4,000 and a 25% chance of losing $2,000" Wtf, isn't option B superior? Or is the EV same and the point is, 50% of the time you're going to be losing some sum of money? Didn't fully understand the wording of the question.

Ev is the same
option A, you loose 6000$ 25% of the time
Option B
You loose 6000$ 6.3% of the time
18.7% of the time you loose 4000$
18.7% of the time you loose 2000$

so if you do 18.7*4000, 18.7*2000, 6000*6.3, it gives 150K, and 6000*25 also gives 150K.
Option B, you loose much more often, but you loose less

On February 06 2010 18:08 player999 wrote: Show nested quote + On February 06 2010 18:01 superfashion wrote: It's funny how my poker side came through on some questions, and my life nit investor side came through on others. When it came to the guaranteed money, I almost always took that. i go for the most EV always dont understand why you guys would not

Its based on the same principle as bankroll management
would you rather have 100% chance to win 5 million or 1% chance to win 501 million? i think its obvious....

People saying "i dont care" are dumb.

All decisions are supposed to be aimed at EV+ with a personally determined threshold of risk.

Expectation of 1-5 is $4 and the expectation of 6 is $5. Of course the significance of money matters as stated in my earlier post.

Those questions about if you would take the sure money is definitely what the 'sure' money means to you though. Like with the dice toss ($5 if you hit 1-5, $30 if you hit 6) every decent pokerplaying long-term winner would take the 6 no doubt. While some single mom on well-fare who can use $5 to buy food for 2 days would probably take the $5. If I had to choose between 600K$ for sure or 75% to win 1000K$ I'd probably pick the 600K$.

i tried but too many questions, gave up after 3 pages of questions