May Stats at 100NL - Page 2

200nl is harder than 100nl... 200nl is more agressive and higer variance than 100nl that that will happen as u move up stakes always.


How on earth a player that reaches 200nl doent realize such a logical thing, thats why i dont take it easy, because what you are saying is not only wrong but incredibly stupid.

On June 29 2007 12:10 mrpav.com wrote: Like a lot of the times in 100NL people use to call preflop with hands i couldn't put them on like K4 and J5 and shit like that. At 200NL they dont seem to be doing that, so a little less stress =)

That's a true story
http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/220958

On June 29 2007 19:50 MilZo wrote: Show nested quote + On June 29 2007 12:10 mrpav.com wrote: Like a lot of the times in 100NL people use to call preflop with hands i couldn't put them on like K4 and J5 and shit like that. At 200NL they dont seem to be doing that, so a little less stress =) That's a true story http://www.liquidpoker.net/h/220958

rofl that hand is terrible

People say you are the best player at 100NL and you make 7$/100...oook...

Dude, its just 1 hand, no ones perfect, why are you so nit picky and negative all the time? who cares

i spent about 5 days at 50nl... literally...

On June 29 2007 21:09 mrpav.com wrote: Dude, its just 1 hand, no ones perfect, why are you so nit picky and negative all the time? who cares

there is no negativity in just pointing out how stupid your statement is.

Do you or dont you realize many many 5 or 10nl donkeys say (phew finally 25nl where people dont call with garbage and i can "read" them) they are basically saying phew... finally im playing with better more competent players.... im going to profit more than i would against absolute retards.


i mean i can understand a microstakers says that but you?, just admitt your stupid comment in silence, shake off that idiotic idea and move on pav.

My brother told me you were a character Baal, so i'll leave it at that.