February so far

sick luck

broke even for 80k hands before that baal lol, not exactly sick luck -.-

its def not only luck though he's playing well too
and he ran bad for a long period of time too so he deserve a little luck =p

SIMULTANEOUS POSTS

Are you sure you're not running sick hot??????? I mean, c'mon, you've played 3,381 hands at NL100......

sure im running good, i mean i'm not gonna substain this winrate..... but maybe i'll run like this till i'm rolled for NL200, nevertheless i really crush the stakes, the players seems worse than on NL50, they try to play back at me so much, and they do it in the wrong spots all day

I look forward to hearing how the next 10k hands go

man im like really sad and stuff breaking even for 20k hands now

dont even have motivation to play =(

anyways gl hope ur good run continues

and stop making plays at me ^^

Hey Faythy, how much you got in rakeback so far this month in these 30k hands or so.

He's got like 500$ made without counting the ub points. Damn I feel like his secretary, but he's asleep lol

u guys live together?

NEVER a higher stake is easier than a lower one... NEVER... so many people are lead to believe this because of the cards, trust me u will learn that in your own time.

you gotta lead yourself through logic and not results, you could win like 100 pots unconteted with contbets still it doesnt mean anything they might just miss eveything, use your logic, 100nl isnt easier than 50nl... 50nl isnt easier than 25nl and so on.

On February 18 2007 19:53 Loco wrote: its def not only luck though he's playing well too and he ran bad for a long period of time too so he deserve a little luck =p

unfortunately poker doesnt give a shit about who deserves what... so its a sick luck run and he joy enjoy it while it last thats all.

On February 18 2007 22:33 Baal wrote: NEVER a higher stake is easier than a lower one... NEVER... so many people are lead to believe this because of the cards, trust me u will learn that in your own time. you gotta lead yourself through logic and not results, you could win like 100 pots unconteted with contbets still it doesnt mean anything they might just miss eveything, use your logic, 100nl isnt easier than 50nl... 50nl isnt easier than 25nl and so on.

100% agreed. your getting way too far ahead of yourself and are gonna pay for it if you move up to 200NL too soon. take your time, moving up before atleast 100k hands is suicide imo.

On February 18 2007 22:33 Baal wrote: NEVER a higher stake is easier than a lower one... NEVER... so many people are lead to believe this because of the cards, trust me u will learn that in your own time.

thats only necessarily true IF everyone starts at the same limit and moves up in the same time, hypothetically if 50NL was all grinders who are trying to move up but 100NL was full of a bunch of rich retards just having fun then 100NL could be easier than 50NL

not saying it IS, just that it could be

the reason why 40,000NL is harder than 5nl is the same why 100nl is harder than 50nl.

vn =]

C-bet works better on 100NL than 50NL ?! Man EVERY FUCKING TIME I c-bet yesterday I got repopped (which would be good if I acctually had hit a hand once in a while but no) : P

On February 18 2007 22:34 Baal wrote: Show nested quote + On February 18 2007 19:53 Loco wrote: its def not only luck though he's playing well too and he ran bad for a long period of time too so he deserve a little luck =p unfortunately poker doesnt give a shit about who deserves what... so its a sick luck run and he joy enjoy it while it last thats all.

qft

shitload of people actually ran better on NL100 than they did on NL50, probably just a coincidence though

Nice run man, you play good. Don't get ahead of yourself though. This all at UB?